190 likes | 359 Vues
This overview provides a detailed examination of evaluation methods utilized within archival and historical research contexts. It explores key questions about current users, methods, and impact of collections like the University of Michigan football teams and NC State Archives. The focus lies on distinguishing evaluation from basic research, outlining various data collection techniques including observation, questionnaires, and interviews. Additionally, it discusses qualitative and quantitative data analysis approaches and emphasizes the importance of drawing meaningful conclusions, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness and utility of archival resources.
E N D
Overview of Evaluation Methods Barbara M. Wildemuth Professor, SILS, UNC-CH
Questions that might be asked • Questions about the current users of the collection • Purposes, methods, impact • Questions about potential future audiences • Purposes, methods, impact NC sea rescue crew, NC State Archives
Focus of the study • Evaluation versus basic research • Object of study Univ. of Michigan football teams, 1884, 1994, Bentley Historical Library, Univ. of Michigan
Evaluation criteria Appalachian Trail, Shenandoah National Park, National Park Service Archives • Effectiveness • Utility/ usefulness/ impact • Satisfaction Pack train, Keystone-Mast Collection, 1870-1963, Online Archive of California
Using the criterion for evaluation • Criterion-referenced evaluation • Norm-referenced evaluation Ladies Hockey Team, ca. 1910, Collecting Toronto: Through the Eyes of Larry Becker, City Archives of Toronto
Data collection • Watching the users • Asking the users questions Nazaret ‘Chick’ Cherkezian and NET camera, National Public Broadcasting Archives, Univ. of Maryland
Methods for watching the users • Direct observation during use • Think-aloud protocols • Transaction logs Library of Congress Manuscript Division Archdiocese of Milwaukee Archives
Methods for asking questions • Questionnaires • Surveys • Measures • Interviews • Focus groups Campaign poster for UNC Daily Tar Heel editor, 1954 Univ. of North Carolina Southern Historical Collection
Sample satisfaction measure McKinney, Yoon, & Zahedi, 2002
Study sample • Define the population of interest • Consider sample size • Develop a sampling plan • Probabilistic sampling • Nonprobabilistic sampling Caroline Virginia Still Anderson (1848-1919), Presbyterian Historical Society
Research design • Controlling extraneous variables • Achieving internal validity • Achieving external validity Alexander’s Ragtime Band, Historic American sheet music, Rare Book, Manuscript & Special Collections Library, Duke University
Data analysis: quantitative • Descriptive statistics • Inferential statistics Quarantine Station, D. A. McLaughlin, National Archives of Canada, Canadian Genealogy Centre
From results to conclusions • Check for statistical significance • Check for meaningfulness of results • Draw conclusions University College, University of Toronto Archives & Records Mgmt. Services
Data analysis: qualitative • Qualitative content analysis • Specifying a unit of analysis • Recognizing themes • Looking for negative evidence Boy’s hat, Documenting the Southeast Asian Refugee Experience, Univ. of California, Irvine, Special Collections and Archives
From results to conclusions • Identify themes for further analysis • Weigh positive against negative • Draw conclusions Eleanor Roosevelt, 1937 Farm & Home Week, Cornell University Archives Richard Nixon & Elvis Presley, 1970, National Archives & Records Admin.
Review • The research/ evaluation question • Evaluation criteria • Data collection • Study sample • Research design • Data analysis • Drawing conclusions Bank, bottle, bumper sticker, Coca-Cola Company Archives
Photo/ image credits (1) • Archdiocese of Milwaukee Archives, www.archmil.org/aboutus/dept.asp?ID=469 • Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan, www.umich.edu/~bhl/ • Canadian Genealogy Centre, www.genealogy.gc.ca • City Archives of Toronto, www.city.toronto.on.ca/archives/ • Coca-Cola Company Archives, www2.coca-cola.com/heritage/ourheritage.html • Cornell University Archives, rmc.library.cornell.edu/collections/subjects/archives.html • Duke University, Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/ Cunard Passenger’s log book, Mystic Seaport Library
Photo/ image credits (2) • Mystic Seaport Library, www.mysticseaport.org/library/home.cfm • Library of Congress Manuscript Division, www.loc.gov/rr/mss/ • National Archives and Records Administration, www.archives.gov • National Park Service Archives, www.cr.nps.gov/history/hisnps/NPSarchives.htm • National Public Broadcasting Archives, University of Maryland, www.lib.umd.edu/NPBA/ • North Carolina State Archives, www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us/sections/archives/arch/ • Online Archive of California, www.oac.cdlib.org Back cover of “the state of Connecticut vs. new haven 9” Yale University Manuscripts & Archives
Photo/ image credits (3) • Presbyterian Historical Society, www.history.pcusa.org • University of California, Irvine, Special Collections and Archives, www.lib.uci.edu/libraries/collections/special/special.html • University of North Carolina Southern Historical Collection, www.lib.unc.edu/mss/shcabout.html • University of Toronto Archives & Records Management Services, www.library.utoronto.ca/utarms/archives/ • Yale University Manuscripts & Archives, www.library.yale.edu/mssa/ Winston Churchill to Lady Randolph Churchill, May 1882 Churchill Archives Centre, Cambridge, UK, Churchill and the Great Republic (exhibit), Library of Congress Manuscript Division