1 / 6

FMCW radar performance and cost

FMCW radar performance and cost. FMCW radar design. FMCW radar - key design questions: The needs of the users: Required sensitivity Range resolution Doppler capability Polarimetric capability Specification of instrument preliminary to detailed design: Dual or single antenna

kaiser
Télécharger la présentation

FMCW radar performance and cost

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FMCW radar performance and cost

  2. FMCW radar design • FMCW radar - key design questions: • The needs of the users: • Required sensitivity • Range resolution • Doppler capability • Polarimetric capability • Specification of instrument preliminary to detailed design: • Dual or single antenna • Tx power (solid state amplifier type) • Key instrument design features to permit later upgrades: • Quality if signal • Constraints of Functionality vs Cost: • How many do we foresee being sold/deployed? • What features are likely to raise the costs above an acceptable threshold? • Target cost of instrument to customer: • <100K Euros?

  3. FMCW radar - Objectives • Radar development - activity objectives: • Maximising sensitivity to be a key objective. • Aiming to see most cloud types and fog - ~-45dBz at a range of 2km. • Range resolution should be manually selectable – depending on the target type. • (15-30 metres typically for fog) • Maximum range ~ 12 – 13 km. • Minimum near-field range ~50 metres • Doppler capability would not require additional hardware but would reduce sensitivity – • seen as a second order requirement. • Signal purity was going to be very important. • Polarimetry seen as a third order need and would require additional hardware - increasing the cost. • The radar unit needs to be rugged and robust for non-specialist users. • The radars will eventually be deployed in a range of climates – • the units will need to be weather proof, and be air-conditioned to maintain temperature control.

  4. One specification for an FMCW cloud radar The specification below is intended as an indication of the performance that can be expected from a FMCW cloud radar that makes use of components available commercially. Frequency of choice: 94 GHz Antenna configuration: Dual antenna system [30 cm diameter horn antennas] Beamwidth 0.55 degrees Transmit Power 400 mW (+26dBm) Receiver Noise Figure 6.5 dB Range resolution: 60 metres Pulse length: 1 msec Pulse Repetition Frequency: 1 kHz

  5. FMCW radar performance figures Radar sensitivity can be improved by integrating pulses so it is anticipated that: At a range of 2 km, the sensitivity would be ~ –39 dBz when integrating for 1 second. At a range of 2 km, the sensitivity would be ~ –44 dBz when integrating for 10 seconds. At a range of 10 km, the sensitivity would be ~ -37 dBz when integrating for 60 seconds.

  6. FMCW development time and cost estimates • The following estimates of development time and costs of a prototype • are for guidance only at this stage: • Development time: ~ 1 year • Development costs (components and manpower) ~ 200K Euros The objective would be to produce systems for sale at below 100K Euros

More Related