1 / 16

JRATS Source Selection

JRATS Source Selection. Recommendation to SSA (Nominal Structure). Proposal Ranking Rationale Factors in descending order of importance. Factor 1: Performance - Most important factor Factor 2: Producibility -Supportability- Deployability Factor 3: T&E schedule Factor 4: Proposal Risk

kaitlyn-sweemey
Télécharger la présentation

JRATS Source Selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JRATS Source Selection Recommendation to SSA (Nominal Structure)

  2. Proposal Ranking Rationale Factors in descending order of importance • Factor 1: Performance - Most important factor • Factor 2: Producibility-Supportability-Deployability • Factor 3: T&E schedule • Factor 4: Proposal Risk • Factor 5: Cost - Least important factor Note: Factors 3 and 4 are of equal importance

  3. Performance Ratings

  4. Performance Ratings Narrative and Risk Assessment (Provide Performance Ratings Assessment Elaboration Here)

  5. P/L/D Factor Ratings and MFG Risk Rating

  6. P/L/D and MFG Narrative and Risk Assessment (Provide P/L/D AND Manufacturing Rating Assessment Elaboration Here)

  7. Test and Evaluation Schedule

  8. T & E Schedule Narrative and Risk Assessment (Provide T&E Rating Assessment Elaboration Here)

  9. Proposal Risk Ratings

  10. Risk Ratings Narrative (Provide Proposal Risk Rating(s) Assessment Elaboration Here)

  11. COST

  12. COST Narrative and Risk (Provide Cost Rating Assessment Elaboration Here)

  13. Factor Ratings Summary

  14. Proposal Ranking OfferorRank 1 2 3 4 5

  15. Recommendation • Offeror who best meets the Sec. M Evaluation Criteria and will provide Best Value to the government is ….

  16. Rationale for Selection • Provide rationale (factor-by-factor) that the contractor recommended will provide Best Value to the government

More Related