1 / 10

Exploring Dishonesty: Judging Scenarios and Generating Criteria for Integrity

Dive into the critical examination of dishonesty through engaging group discussions and scenario evaluations. You'll collaboratively generate your own criteria for dishonesty while analyzing various examples and non-examples. After creating a Frayer model for Stephen Carter's "The Insufficiency of Honesty", you'll write a comparative paper to further enhance your understanding. Prepare to share insights and judgments in a vibrant class environment as we unpack the complexities of truthful behavior.

kaiya
Télécharger la présentation

Exploring Dishonesty: Judging Scenarios and Generating Criteria for Integrity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Critical ThinkingTopic: Dishonesty 3-4-13

  2. I want your book reviews Pass ‘em on up It is also time to pick a new book…Must be read by the end of April (I know that’s a ton of time to read one book…I know)

  3. Generating Criteria Now that we have used someone else’s criteria to make judgments, lets generate some criteria of our own. This is obviously quite important when writing an extended definition paper.

  4. Lets discuss a scenario Look at #1 on your handout I will read it aloud Is Alfonzo dishonest or not?

  5. What Time is it?GROUP TIME!!! Get into groups of 3 or 4

  6. Examples • The following scenarios may or may not be examples of dishonesty • Your job is to: • 1) Read the rest of the scenarios as a group • 2) Discuss if the person is acting dishonestly or not • 3) Generate criteria about dishonesty • Make a group list on a sheet of paper

  7. Lets make a class list I want to hear some criteria from ya’ll I will make record our criteria

  8. Now that we have criteria • On your own • Your Task: • 1) Pick a scenario from the handout • 2) Create a contrasting example (non-example) • 3) Share with us PLEASE!!!! I BEG YOU

  9. I will judge you for judging • Now that we have generated criteria and come up with non-examples, it is time to judge. • Look on the back of your scenarios sheet. You will find some sample evaluations of the scenarios we judged. • Your task: • 1) Read each paragraph • 2) Answer the questions contained therein (on a separte sheet of paper) • 3) Create a brand new Frayer Model on dishonesty

  10. READ my people! Read “The Insufficiency of Honesty” by Stephen Carter Create Frayer model for HIS DEFINITION Write a short paper compare and contrasting your frayer model with his

More Related