1 / 21

New Tools for Organic Synthesis and Natural Product Characterization

New Tools for Organic Synthesis and Natural Product Characterization. Christina LeGay Derksen Research Group St. Francis Xavier University . Polyketides : What are they? . Secondary Metabolites Often Biologically & Pharmacologically active Erthromycin A – antibiotic .

kaiyo
Télécharger la présentation

New Tools for Organic Synthesis and Natural Product Characterization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Tools for Organic Synthesis and Natural Product Characterization Christina LeGay Derksen Research Group St. Francis Xavier University

  2. Polyketides: What are they? • Secondary Metabolites • Often Biologically & Pharmacologically active • Erthromycin A – antibiotic

  3. Polyketides: What are they? • Amphotericin B – antifungal drug • Peloruside A – antimitotic agent

  4. Polyketide Preparation • Specific stereochemistry can be achieved by the use of chiral auxiliaries: Evans’ Auxiliary • Advantages: popular, well-established, versatile, pre-made auxiliaries available • Disadvantages: adds steps, chromatography required, need stoichiometric amounts of auxiliary

  5. Organocatalysis • ProlineAldol: • Advantages: cheap, catalytic, good enantiomeric excess, avoids use of toxic transition metals • Disadvantages: limited substrate scope, often poor diastereomeric ratio

  6. Ideal Catalysis • Subject the polyketide subunits to Asymmetric retro-aldol catalysis • Catalyst requirements: stereoselective, wide substrate scope, fast reaction, good yield

  7. Applications • Characterization of Natural Products by NMR • could be + or – absolute confirmation • compare to standard • Mosher ester analysis can give absolute configuration • Advantage: established, precedental • Disadvantage: need enough material!, needs to have reactive alcohol for selective reaction • Our procedure could use Mass Spec to determine absolute configuration • Brasilinolide A degradation

  8. Our Approach • Synthesis of model polyketide subunits: β-hydroxyketones and esters • Base-catalyzed aldol addition • Advantages: very cheap, fairly quick, good yield • Disadvantages: chromatography required • Reformatsky • Advantages: solvent free, very simple reaction, wide substrate scope • Disadvantages: chromatography required

  9. Nature’s Precedent • Aldolases: catalytic aldol reaction • Fructose Bisphosphate – catalyzes reversible retro-aldol

  10. Chemical Literature Precedent • Rapamycin: immunosuppressant drug • retro-aldol in presence of ZnCl2 catalyst “Studies on the Chemistry of Rapamycin: Novel Transformations under Lewis-Acid Catalysis," Luengo et al, Tetrahedron Letters (34,6,pp.991-994, 1993).

  11. Chemical Literature Precedent • R106-1: potent & abundant antifungal agent • retro-aldol optimized in presence of TNO•2H2O "Trimethylamine N-oxide: A Novel Reagent for the Promotion of the Retro-Aldol Reaction of R106-1 (LY295337)," Rodriguez and Zweifel, Tetrahedron Letters (37,25,pp.4301-4304, 1996).

  12. Proof of Concept • Significant product formed using NaOH and HCl as catalysts in ethanol • effective retro-aldol catalysts, very fast reaction, large yield

  13. Our Progress • Methyleneβ-hydroxy esters

  14. Our Progress (cont’d) • Dimethylβ-hydroxy esters

  15. Our Progress (cont’d) • Dimethylβ-hydroxy esters

  16. Our Progress (cont’d) • β-hydroxyketone: aldol adduct

  17. Mechanistic Insights • Groups encouraging Retro-Aldolproducts (desired): • Groups encouraging Elimination products (undesired):

  18. Summary • Results, which substrates/solvents/acid/base works best

  19. Future Work • Hammett Plots of aryl substituents • Catalyst screens with best substrate • Asymmetric ligands on catalysts (H3PO4 catalysts)

  20. Acknowledgments • St. Francis Xavier University • CFI • Merck-Frost

  21. References

More Related