Create Presentation
Download Presentation

Download Presentation

Financial Analysis, Planning and Forecasting Theory and Application

Download Presentation
## Financial Analysis, Planning and Forecasting Theory and Application

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

**Financial Analysis, Planning and ForecastingTheory and**Application Chapter 4 Application of Discriminant Analysis and Factor Analysis in Financial Management By Alice C. Lee San Francisco State University John C. Lee J.P. Morgan Chase Cheng F. Lee Rutgers University**Outline**• 4.1 Introduction • 4.2 Credit analysis • 4.3 Bankruptcy and financial distress analysis • 4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful financial ratios • 4.5 Bond ratings forecasting • 4.6 Bond quality ratings and the change of quality ratings for the electric utility industry • 4.7 Ohlson’s and Shumway’s methods for Estimating Default Probability • 4.8 Summary • Appendix 4A. Jackknife method and its application in MDA analysis • Appendix 4B. Multi-period Logistic Regression**4.2 Credit analysis**(4.1) where Yi = Index value for the ith account; = ith firm’s quick ratio; = ith firm’s total sales/inventory ratio; and A and B are the parameters or weights to be determined.**4.2 Credit analysis**(4.2) (4.3) (4.4a)**4.2 Credit analysis**(4.4b) Where = Variance of X1; = Variance of X2; = Covariance between X1 and X2; = Difference between the average of X1’s for good accounts and the average of X1’s for bad accounts; and = Difference between the average of X2 for good accounts the average of X2 for bad accounts.**4.2 Credit analysis**TABLE 4.1 Status and index values of the accounts**4.3 Bankruptcy and financial distress analysis**• Discriminant Model (Y is the value of z-score) (4.5) TABLE 4.2 Mean ratios of bankrupt / nonbankrupt firms From Altman, E. I., “Financial ratios, discriminantAnalysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy,” Journal of Finance23 (1968), p. 596, TableI. Reprinted by Permission of Edward I. Altman and Journal of Finance. Z-score >2.99 : non-bankrupt sector; Z-score < 1.81 : bankruptcy; Z-score between 1.81 and 2.99 : gray area.**Empirical**• When we apply Equation (4.5) to calculate financial Z-score, the model should be defined as • Here we use JNJ in 2005 as an example, • Then, the z-score for JNJ is 1.2(0.3233)+1.4(0.7147)+3.3(0.2353)+0.6(8.8683)+1.0(0.8706) =8.3567**4.3 Bankruptcy and financial distress analysis**TABLE 4.3 Profile analysis for problem banks From Sinkey, J.F., “A multivariate statistical analysis of the characteristics of problem banks,” Journal of Finance 30 (1975), Table 3. Reprinted by permission. This paper was written while the author was a Financial Economics at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D.C. He is currently Professor of Banking and Finance at College of Business Administration, University of Georgia.**4.3 Bankruptcy and financial distress analysis**(4.6) where = 0: Unsecured loan, 1: Secured loan; = 0: Past interest payment due, 1: Current loan; = 0: Not audited firm, 1: Audited firm; = 0: Net loss firm 1: Net profit firm = Working Capital/Current Assets; = 0: Loan criticized by bank examiner, 1: Loan not criticized by bank examiner.**4.3 Bankruptcy and financial distress analysis**(4.7) where = Agents’ balances/Total assets; a measure of the firms’ accounts receivable management; = Stocks at cost (preferred and common)/Stocks at market (preferred and common); measures investment management; = Bonds at cost/Bonds at market; measures the firm’s age; = (Loss adjustment expenses paid + underwriting expenses paid) / Net premiums written; a measure of a firm’s funds flow from insurance operations; = Combined ratio; traditional measure of underwriting profitability; and = Premiums written direct/Surplus; a measure of the firm’s sales aggressiveness.**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categoriesfor industrial firms**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.)**4.4 Applications of factor analysis to select useful**financial ratios TABLE 4.4a Cross-sectional comparison of financial ratios and factor loadings defining eight financial ratio categories for industrial firms (Cont.) From Johnson, W.B., “The cross-sectional stability of financial ratio patterns,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 14 (1979), Table 2. Reprinted by permission of W. Bruce Johnson and JFQA. a Indicates variables having a within-sample cross-loading of between 0.50 and 0.70 on one other factor. *t-test of untransformed data significant at p 0.05.**4.5 Bond ratings forecasting**TABLE 4.4b Cross-sectional congruency coefficients for eight financial-ratio dimensions for 1974**4.5 Bond ratings forecasting**Ratio found useful in study; (X) Ratio mentioned in study; (1) Net Income plus Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization; (2) No Credit Interval = Quick Assets minus CL/Operating Expense minus Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization; (3) Quick Flow = C + MS + AR + (Annual Sales divided by 12)/[CGS = Depreciation + Selling and Administration + Interest] divided by 12]; (4) Cash Interval = C + MS/Operating Expense minus Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization;**4.5 Bond ratings forecasting**(5) Defensive Interval = QA/Operating Expense Minus Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization; (6) Capital Expenditure/Sales; (7) Nonoperating Income before Taxes/Sales. From Chen, K. H., and T. A. Shimerda, “An empirical analysis of useful financial ratios,” Financial Management (Spring 1981), Exhibit 1. Reprinted by permission.**4.5 Bond ratings forecasting**From Chen, K. H., and T. A. Shimerda, “An empirical analysis of useful financial ratios,” Financial Management (Spring 1981), Exhibit 5. Reprinted by permission. * Ratio not included in the final factors of the PEMC studies. ** Ratio not in the 48 ratios included in the PEMC study.**4.5 Bond ratings forecasting**TABLE 4.7 Variable means, test of significance, and important ranks**4.6 Bond quality ratings and the change of quality ratings**for the electric utility industry The multivariate-analysis technique developed by Pinches and Mingo for analyzing industrial bond ratings has also been used to determine bond quality ratings and their associated changes for electric utilities. Pinches, Singleton, and Jahakhani (1978) (PSJ) used this technique to determine whether fixed coverages were a major determinant of electric utility bond ratings. Bhandari, Soldofsky, and Boe (1979) (BSB) investigate whether or not a multivariate discriminant model that incorporates the recent levels, past levels, and the instability of financial ratios can explain and predict the quality rating changes of electric utility bonds. PSJ (1978) found that fixed coverage is the only (and not the dominant) financial variable that apparently influences the bond ratings assigned to electric utility firms. Other important variables are the climate of regulation, total assets, return on total assets, growth rate or net earnings, and construction expenses/total assets.2 The major finding of BSB’s study is that the MDA method can be more successful in predicting bond rating changes than it had been predicting the bond ratings themselves. These results have shed some light for the utility regulation agency on the determinants of bond ratings and the change of bond ratings for electric utility industries.**4.7 Ohlson’s and Shumway’s methods for Estimating**Default Probability X1 = Natural log of (Total Assets/ GNP Implicit Price Deflator Index). The index assumes a base value of 100 for 1968; X2 = (Total Liabilities/Total Assets); X3 = (Current Assets – Current Liabilities)/Total Assets; X4 = Current Assets/ Current Liabilities; X5 = One if total liabilities exceeds total assets, zero otherwise; X6 = Net income/total assets; X7 = Funds provided by operations/total liabilities; X8 = One if net income was negative for the last two years, zero otherwise; and X9 = (Net income in year t – Net income in t–1) / (Absolute net income in year t + Absolute net income in year t–1).**4.7 Ohlson’s and Shumway’s methods for Estimating**Default Probability (4.8) Where , P = the probability of bankruptcy.**4.7 Ohlson’s and Shumway’s methods for Estimating**Default Probability (4.9) Where , P = the probability of bankruptcy; X1 = Net Income/Total Assets; X2 = (Total Liabilities/Total Assets); X3 = The logarithm of (each firm’s market capitalization at the end of year prior to the observation year / total market capitalization of NYSE and AMEX market); X4 = Past excess return as the return of the firm in year t-1 minus the value-weighted CRSP NYSE/AMEX index return in year t - 1; and X5 = idiosyncratic standard deviation of each firm’s stock returns. It is defined as the standard deviation of the residual of a regression which regresses each stock’s monthly returns in year t – 1 on the value-weighted NYSE/AMEX index return for the same year.**4.8 Summary**In this chapter, we have discussed applications of two multivariate statistical methods in discriminant analysis and factor analysis. Examples of using two-group discriminant functions to perform credit analysis, predict corporate bankruptcy, and determine problem banks and distressed P-L insurers were discussed in detail. Basic concepts of factor analysis were presented, showing their application in determining useful financial ratios. In addition, the combination of factor analysis and discriminant analysis to analyze industrial bond ratings was discussed. Finally, Ohlson’s and Shumway’s methods for estimating default probability were discussed. In sum, this chapter shows that multivariate statistical methods can be used to do practical financial analysis for both managers and researchers.**Appendix 4A. Jackknife method and its application in MDA**analysis (4.A.1) (4.A.2) (4.A.3)**Appendix 4A. Jackknife method and its application in MDA**analysis