1 / 1

Guidelines for Academic Misconduct Procedures and Module Team Responsibilities

This document outlines the procedures for addressing academic misconduct identified through student submissions. Students are advised to submit their work according to specified methods, while module teams are responsible for the physical marking of submissions. Should there be indicators of academic misconduct, refer to your school's policies for necessary actions. Staff are instructed not to discuss misconduct concerns directly with students. Decision points involve the review and confirmation of recommendations, meetings for discussion, and potential penalties. Maintain equity and consistency throughout the process.

kamala
Télécharger la présentation

Guidelines for Academic Misconduct Procedures and Module Team Responsibilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Students submit work through specified method Student Submissions are physically marked by module team Module Team Cause for concern is raised due to ‘indicators’ found in paper Refer to your own school policy for academic misconduct procedures. Staff are not to discuss academic misconduct with students and should advise that they will be contacted by their school to attend a meeting with CAU First Decision Point - School Module Leader Change grade on e-vision to marked grade plus ‘AM’ CAU review the evidence and make decision based on the context of a university wide consistent approach ensuring equity Second Decision Point - CAU CAU confirm schools recommendation CAU return to school for further consideration CAU • AM meeting involving students and staff • Hearing held • Decision made • Penalties if appropriate • Module leader advised CAU/ School/ Student If case proven, CAU updates the grade on SITS with the relevant penalty CAU

More Related