M O D U L O IV

1. MODULE IV MODULO IV

2. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION

3. MUTUAL RECOGNITION • ARREST WARRANT • ORDER • FREEZING PROPERTY OR • EVIDENCE • CONFISCATION • EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT • EXECUTION OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES • EXECUTION OF NON-CUSTODIAL SUPERVISION MEASURES • EXECUTION OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCES • EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS AND DECISIONS ON PROBATION MEASURES WITH A VIEW TO THE SUPERVISION OF PROBATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS

4. UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (1) MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND INTERPRETATION CONCEPT, NATURE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EAW

5. UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (2) SCOPE 4.1 Spatial scope 4.2 Temporal scope 4.3 Material scope

6. 5. ISSUING AN EAW • 5.1 Competent authority • 5.2 The application • 5.2.1 Procedural stage • 5.2.2 Form and content • 5.3 Transmission • 5.4 Action pending the decision • 5.4.1 Additional information • 5.4.2 Authorisations • 5.4.3 Declaration and temporary transfer UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (3)

7. 5. ISSUING AN EAW (cont.) • 5.5.Action after the decision • 5.5.1 Refusal • 5.5.2Surrender • 5.5.3Transit • 5.6 Effects of surrender • 5.6.1 Calculation of deprivation of liberty • 5.6.2 Speciality rule • 5.6.3 Subsequent surrender • 5.7 Expenses UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (4)

8. 6. EXECUTION OF AN EAW 6.1 Competent authority 6.2 Initial action 6.2.1 Arrest and appearance before the judicial authority 6.2.2 Hearing of the requested person 6.3 Procedure 6.4 Action pending the decision 6.4.1 Supplementary information 6.4.2. Declaration and temporary transfer UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (5)

9. UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (6) • 6. EXECUTION OF AN EAW (cont.) • 6.5.Decision • 6.5.1 Grounds for mandatory non-execution • 6.5.2 Grounds for optional non-execution • 6.5.3 Multiple requests • 6.5.4 Grounds for setting conditions • 6.6 Surrender • 6.6.1 Conditioned or postponed surrender

10. UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (7) • 7. ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION • Eurojust Report 2009: • http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/press_releases/annual_reports/2009/Annual_Report_2009_EN.pdf

11. UNIT XI 1.-ORDERS FREEZING PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE IN EUROPE, CONFISCATION AND THE EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT in the context of the principle of mutual recognition and immediate execution.

12. UNIT XI 2.-CURRENT LEGISLATION 2.1- Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA 2.2.- Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA. 2.3.- Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA

13. UNIT XI 3.- MEANING AND SCOPE. 3.1.- Freezing orders. 3.2.- Confiscation. 3.3.- The European evidence warrant.

14. UNIT XI 4.- SCOPE OF EACH OF THE THREE INSTITUTIONS: 4.1.- Material scope. 4.2.- Procedural scope. 4.3.- Temporal scope.

15. UNIT XI 5.- COMPETENT AND INVOLVED AUTHORITIES IN EACH CASE. 5.1. Issuing authorities 5.2 Executing authorities.

16. UNIT XI 6- THE ACTIVE PROCESS. 6.1.- Adoption in proceedings. 6.2.- Generation and documentation. The certificate. 6.3.- Transmission and incidents.

17. UNIT XI 7- THE PASSIVE PROCESS. 7.1.- Recognition. 7.2.- Non-recognition or non-execution 7.3.- Postponement of execution. 7.4.- Immediate execution 7.4.1. Competence 7.4.2. Procedure and term 7.4.3. Legal remedies 7.4.4. Material content of execution 7.4.5. Process of execution 7.4.6. Cessation of execution 7.4.7 Expenses, reimbursement and losses and damages.

18. MODULE IVUNIT 12 FINANCIAL PENALTIES

19. FINANCIAL PENALTIES • 1.- INTRODUCTION (in relation to mutual recognition) • 2 BACKGROUND TO THE CROSS-BORDER ENFORCEMENT OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES

20. FINANCIAL PENALTIES • 1.3.- BACKGROUND TO THE FRAMEWORK DECISION • -COMMISSION COMMUNICATION (2000) • - COUNCIL’S PROGRAMME OF MEASURES (2001) • - GERMAN INITIATIVE (2001) • - INITIATIVE FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE AND SWEDEN (2001) • - PARLIAMENT REPORT (2002)

21. FINANCIAL PENALTIES 2.- FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA

22. FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA • 2.1.- SCOPE • 2.1.1.- BASIC DEFINITIONS • 2.1.1.1.- CONCEPT OF “DECISION” • 2.1.1.2.- CONCEPT OF “PENALTY” • 2.1.2.- CONCEPT OF OFFENCE • 2.1.3.- TERRITORIAL SCOPE

23. FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA • 2.2.- GROUNDS FOR NON-RECOGNITION • 2.2.1.- GROUNDS. Paying special attention to: • Trials in absentia • Multiple enforcement. • Legal persons • The human rights clause • 2.2.2.- CONSEQUENCES

24. FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA • 2.3.- PROCEDURE • 2.3.1.- JURISDICTION • 2.3.2.- PROCESSING • 2.3.3.- ENFORCEMENT • Sum of the penalty • Alternative penalty • Other incidents • Consequences of enforcement.

25. FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA • 3.- CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPOSITION DECLARATIONS BY THE STATES

26. UNIT XIII • OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION

27. UNIT XIIITHE RECOGNITION OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES NOT INVOLVING A DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY • 2.1. The action of the Commission: the GREEN PAPER and the proposal on the European supervision order. • 2.2 FRAMEWORK DECISION

28. UNIT XIII . THE ENFORCEMENT OF SENTENCES INVOLVING THE DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY • 3.1. The Strasbourg Convention and the Commission Green Paper • 3.2 FRAMEWORK DECISION • 3.3 Scope and purpose. Relationship with the EAW • 3.4 Coordination with the rules on procedural rights

29. UNIT XIII MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS AND PROBATION DECISIONS WITH A VIEW TO THE SUPERVISION OF PROBATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS • 4.1. The European space of justice and judgments that establish measures involving the conditional suspension of a sentence or alternative penalties • 4.2. The structure and aims of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008. • 4.3 The relationship with other European conventions.

30. UNIT XIIITHE PROSPECTS FOR MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN LIGHT OF THE TREATY OF LISBON