1 / 4

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION. Session 5, 10/6/11: Update prospectus Reschedule midterm exam for 10/20 R eview the test plan Review & discuss Chapter 27 in the Eval . Theory, Models, & Applications book

kaori
Télécharger la présentation

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION Session 5, 10/6/11: Update prospectus Reschedule midterm exam for 10/20 Review the test plan Review & discuss Chapter 27 in the Eval. Theory, Models, & Applications book Progress reports on finding an evaluation to metaevaluate & a completed metaevaluation report

  2. Assignment for Session 6, 10/13/11 • Read the AADHAR program evaluation metaevaluation report • Prepare a written critique of the report (for your own use) • Contrast the AADHAR metaevaluation report with the one you selected to study

  3. MIDTERM EXAM SECTIONS CONTENT AREAS • GAO standards (12%) • The Program Evaluation Standards (15%) • Metaevaluation concepts (25%) • Metaevaluation tasks (14%) • Metaevaluation tools (14%) • Metaevaluation applications (12%) • Metaevaluatorqualifications (8%) ITEM TYPES • Modified true-false (30%) • Multiple choice (33%) • Matching (21%) • Work sample followed by multiple choice (16%)

  4. An early illustrative metaevaluation • House, E. R., Rivers, W., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1974). An assessment of the Michigan accountability system. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(10). • Stufflebeam, D. L. (August, 1974). “A response to the Michigan Education Department’s Defense of Their Accountability System.” Paper # 1 in Occasional Paper Series. Kalamazoo, MI: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.

More Related