1 / 35

December 2011

Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report David Jones. December 2011. It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed; To measure and identify the effectiveness of newspaper creative

karen-mcneil
Télécharger la présentation

December 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report David Jones December 2011

  2. It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed; • To measure and identify the effectiveness of newspaper creative • To help improve understanding of how to use newspapers effectively • To improve the understanding of the roles newspaper advertising can play • To improve the standard of newspaper creative • To provide a consistent metric that is accepted as the industry standard

  3. Pre/post effectiveness studies, measuring in-market effects and how newspaper work with Television Comprehensive analysis of how newspapers can best be used to influence purchase behaviour Comparison of creative against category averages The Newspaper Works’ effectiveness partner:

  4. Recognised industry measures + Newspaper measures Proprietary newspaper measures The Newspaper Works’ effectiveness partner:

  5. Ad Appearance: • Sydney Morning Herald, Wednesday November 2nd2011 • This ad was one of three shown to respondents • Sample: Australians 16+ • Sample size: 102 • Test market: Sydney • Fieldwork:2ND – 12TH December 2010 • Conducted online by IpsosMediaCT • Benchmarks used: Newspaper Norms (see appendix for details)

  6. Ad Appearance: • Sun Herald, Sunday October 23rd 2011 • This ad was one of three shown to respondents • Sample: Australians 16+ • Sample size: 102 • Test market: Sydney • Fieldwork: TBC December 2010 • Conducted online by IpsosMediaCT • Benchmarks used: Newspaper Norms (see appendix for details) Branded Newspaper Benchmarks Ad shown as it appeared in the Sun Herald on October 23rd, 2011

  7. Retail Averages Overall, the ad has achieved highs scores for many positive creative diagnostics including ‘has a great photo/image’ and ‘Catches my eye’. Some respondents found the ad cluttered but this does not necessarily indicate that the ad does not perform well against other benchmarking metrics. The ad scored below averages for ‘Makes it easy to see what is on offer’ which perhaps suggests there is an expectation that ads from retailers almost invariably carry specific offers or sales information.

  8. Branding removed Retail Averages Given the visual and strategic departure from David Jones’ usual ad style, the brand linkage scores are encouraging. Ad Recognition and Brand Linkage can be affected by weight of campaign and timing of research. Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. Note: Ad Recognition and Brand Linkage can be affected by weight of campaign and timing of research

  9. +19 +13 Retail Averages The ad performs significantly well at improving familiarity/understanding of the brand and also positions the brand as significantly different to other department stores Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l.

  10. 42% of respondents returned very specific elements of main messaging, with a further 19% mentioning shopping in other contexts. 39% not knowing what the main message is could have been a result of too much clutter.

  11. What did the respondents say about the ad? ‘Best of the best’ Service orientated Too much info? / Or just enough I thought that the main message got obscured with too much writing It seems more refined and elegant than other newspaper ads. It has a feel of being the best of the best. The David Jones ad was very real and probably for the first time triggered me to consider shopping at David Jones. Paying too much for the same article as can be purchased in Kmart for $10 There is just too much information for me to have any interest in reading. I love DJ's and I think their ads are well done. I don't mind Miranda Kerr, it's good to see her on there. Playing to its strengths - quality and reputation but also stressing competitiveness.

  12. The word cloud shows a strong connection to quality service

  13. Retail Averages Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. The main Role being played by this ad is one of driving brand Affinity, as well as brand Reappraisal. It also delivers well on Information and Extension. Achieving these attributes may help differentiate David Jones, and firm up loyalty, in a competitive retail environment.

  14. Retail Averages Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. % scores The most likely action off the back of this ad is store visitation, which meets the key objectives of the advertising.

  15. This ad has achieved very strong and positive results for Creative Diagnostics, doing very well against statements such as • Has a great photo/image • Looks good • Significant results were achieved for Affinity on RoleMap and the most likely Action off the back of the ad was ‘Visit store/look out for’ • There were mostly positive, and some negative reactions to the ad’s refinement and links back to heritage • Some verbatims expressed that this ad reinforced to them that David Jones is a store for the ‘upper class’ and they could buy cheaper elsewhere • In a comparison with Ebay, who attempted to ‘copycat’ this ad in a tactical way, it was clear that David Jones drew stronger levels of Affinity and consumer intentions • Overall, the ad demonstrated a different approach that generated good feelings towards David Jones which can only be a positive result in what is probably the most challenging retail environment on record.

  16. Comparison with other ads

  17. Snapshot of Creative Benchmarking History November 2008 August 2008 May 2009 September 2010 September 2009 December 2011

  18. Different roles Three very different RoleMaps are generated by three very different strategies, as demonstrated by these executions from 2008, including once for the David Jones Amex.

  19. Good feelings The ‘It Costs No More’ ad from 2009 achieved strong RoleMap results for Extension and Affinity. It is the #1 ad we’ve tested in this category, at driving Reappraisal.

  20. A significant ‘Promise’ The Summer ‘09 ad achieved scores equal to most Retail averages while the Summer ‘10 ad achieved somewhat disappointing results, falling below averages on Call to Action.

  21. Comparison with Myer All these ads were tested in December 2010

  22. Competing brand ambassadors Putting brand ambassadors head to head, the Myer ad has achieved strong Affinity results while also achieving the average result for Call to Action, and campaign Extension. The David Jones ad by comparison, delivers more Information.

  23. Brand versus sales offers These Myer ads from late 2010 focused on sales offers to drive a strong Call to Action.

  24. Likely to generate store traffic Visit store / Look out for ‘Our Promise’ has achieved significantly high scores at this metric, comparing favourably with the most recent executions we’ve tested for Myer. The specific sales offers of Super Saturday generated a strong intention to visit the store, while the almost identical strategy of Summer Savings, while still very high, achieved a slightly lower score.

  25. Affinity and Reappraisal Affinity Reappraisal The ‘Our Promise’ execution is now the #1 ad we’ve tested for generating brand Affinity in the ‘Retail-Department Store’ category, beating out Myer’s 2010 Christmas ad with Jennifer Hawkins ‘Our Promise’ is now equal #2 in it’s category for ads we’ve tested at driving brand Reappraisal. #1 is ‘It Costs No More’ from 2009 which also spoke to pricing perceptions.

  26. Ebay’s Copycat Response December 2011 (In papers November 2nd) December 2011 (In papers November 6tH) Nb: each ad was reviewed by a separate respondent group so the respondents are not comparing the ads side by side but offering an unbiased view.

  27. David Jones vs. Ebay The David Jones ad did a great job at driving brand Affinity off the back of heritage and service promises, while Ebay’s ad generated significant levels of Reappraisal. Ultimately, respondents were more likely to visit a David Jones store (exceeding Action Map averages) than ‘visit’ Ebay, or use Web Search as a result of their copy cat ad (which met, but did not exceed averages) which may indicate respondent attachment to a well known, trusted brand.

  28. Top Performers on Rolemap

  29. 6.2x Higher than norm 5x Higher than norm 2.1x Higher than norm 2.9x Higher than norm 7.8x Higher than norm 3.8x Higher than norm All newspaper norm. Dec 2011 (Updated monthly)

  30. Established in 2006 by the major Australian newspaper publishers: • News Limited • Fairfax Media (including Rural Press) • APN News and Media • West Australian Newspapers • Represents paid national, metropolitan, regional and community titles. • Primary aims: • To promote newspapers as a powerful medium for advertisers • To ensure that newspapers are perceived as being contemporary and relevant in a transforming media landscape

  31. Testing of randomly selected and hand picked newspaper display ads • Over 7,000 ad observations in total • 36 test ads (27 randomly selected, 9 hand picked) • 100+ observations per ad • Population representative sample of the five mainland state capitals • Conducted online by Ipsos Media CT, July-August and October – November 2008 • Sample size 2,475

  32. Newspapers are a powerful medium to utilise across a broad range of strategic roles. Six strategic advertising roles have been validated both qualitatively and quantitatively, resulting in the creation of Role Map, one of two proprietary newspaper metrics. Role Map demonstrates how consumers connect with newspaper advertising across the six roles, comparing the performance of creative against a footprint of all ads tested. Retail average Statements are tailored to be appropriate to the advertising category.

  33. Newspapers are recognised as an effective medium for delivering a Call to Action. Action Map, the third proprietary newspaper metric, expands on this strategic role to provide an understanding of the types of action a newspaper ad inspires. Measured via forced exposure, people are asked about the actions they would consider taking (or have taken) as a result of seeing the ad. New measure introduced in March 2010, norm not yet available.

  34. Another proprietary newspaper metric provides a set of creative diagnostics unique to the attributes of newspaper advertising. They’ve been developed to help identify areas for improvement where results across other brand and advertising measures may require further analysis and interrogation. Statements are tailored to be appropriate to the advertising category. Retail average

More Related