1 / 6

Hoosiers, Daddy

This passage explores various syntactical constructions and stylistic elements found in the texts of "Hoosiers" and "Daddy." It includes questions that identify specific devices like anaphora, allusion, and metonymy. Additionally, the evaluation of sentence types—simple, compound, or complex—offers insights into the dominant syntactical patterns in the passage. The overall purpose and style are analyzed to enhance understanding of the authors’ intentions, highlighting persuasive and introspective elements.

karena
Télécharger la présentation

Hoosiers, Daddy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hoosiers, Daddy

  2. 1. • Paragraph 2 contains which of the following? • A. anaphora • B. asyndeton • C. allusion • D. metonymy • E. polysyndeton

  3. 2. • The second sentence in paragraph three is an example of which of the following: • A. simple • B. compound • C. interrogative • D. compound-complex • E. informative

  4. 3. • The dominant syntactical construction in paragraph 2 is: • A. simple sentences • B. complex sentences • C. compound sentences • D. interrogative sentences • E. compound-complex sentences

  5. 4. • The style of the passage as a whole can be best described as: • A. allegorical • B. direct • C. terse • D. disjointed • E. introspective

  6. 5. • The purpose of the passage as a whole is to: • A. persuade the team to try harder • B. itemize the shortcomings of the team • C. subtly confront the speaker’s detractors • D. convince the players to focus on the task at hand • E. reiterate and recast the team’s philosophy

More Related