1 / 38

Welcome to Novi Sad !

Promoting Quality by Internal Accreditation Veljko Malba ša University of Novi Sad Novi Sad, J un e 4, 2004. Welcome to Novi Sad !. Veljko Malbaša , Ph.D. Professor and Director Department of Electrical Engineering Phone: 021 450-032 malbasa @ uns.ns.ac.yu. Project.

karena
Télécharger la présentation

Welcome to Novi Sad !

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Promoting Qualityby Internal AccreditationVeljko MalbašaUniversity of Novi SadNovi Sad, June 4, 2004

  2. Welcome to Novi Sad !

  3. Veljko Malbaša, Ph.D. • Professor and Director Department of Electrical Engineering • Phone: 021 450-032 • malbasa@uns.ns.ac.yu

  4. Project • “Internal accreditation of programs at the UNS” • Funded by the Ministry of Education, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina

  5. Participants • Marija Stefanović, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Faculty of Philosophy • Dragoslav Herceg, Ph.D., Professor, Faculty of Science • Veljko Malbaša, Ph. D., Professor, Faculty of Engineering • Students

  6. Topics • International dimension • Where we are

  7. Overview • Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions

  8. Quality Assurance • Accreditation • UNS • Serbia • Conclusions

  9. Quality • Suitability of ways and means for the achievement of specific defined aims • Fitness for purpose

  10. Quality at University • Teaching • Research • Technology Transfer • Administration

  11. Why? • Globalisation of the higher education • International dimension of quality • Global practice

  12. Aspects of Quality • Development • Improvement • Assurance • Supervision

  13. QualityAssurance • Assessment • Audit • Accreditation

  14. Assessment • Quantitative measurement • How many faculty, students • How many rooms, chairs

  15. Audit • External review of the processes inside the University

  16. Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions

  17. Accreditation • Attest to the quality • Determined upon an external review • Institution or program has to meet certain criteria • Valid for a limited period

  18. Practice of Accreditation • Development of standards • Self - evaluation • External review • Accreditation decision

  19. Two purposes • Present: Assessment • Future: Improvement

  20. Two Types of Accreditation • Institutional • Programmatic

  21. Questions • What are you trying to do? • Why? • How? • Why are you doing it this way?

  22. Questions • Is this the best way? • How do you know it works? • How to improve?

  23. Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions

  24. Serbia • National Committee for Accreditation of Higher Education • Procedure and documents produced • Overwhelmed with requests to open new private institutions

  25. State of the affairs • No common, systematic policy • No standards • No measures • No procedures • No legislature

  26. Misunderstandings • ISO • “We do a good job!” • “Our graduates are excellent!” • “As good as it gets!”

  27. Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions

  28. UNS: Vision • Develop and maintain high quality • Leader in the region • European standards

  29. University of Novi Sad • Internal Accreditation Committee • Deals with UNS member institutions • Compatible with national and European standards and policies

  30. Objectives • Internal accreditation of programs • Help institutions • Promote accreditation

  31. Documents • General rules and procedures • Guide for self evaluation • Brochure

  32. Some recommendations • Legal framework • Awareness • Training • Develop criteria

  33. Some recommendations • All programs go through the accreditation • Start with self evaluation reports • One member of the working group from outside S&M

  34. Open questions Inputs Outcomes Evaluation

  35. Open questions • Criteria • What to do with institutions that are not accredited • What about the duplication of programs

  36. Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions

  37. Conclusions • Groundwork completed • Goal: prepare for action • Round table tomorrow

More Related