1 / 14

PH 401

PH 401. Dr. Cecilia Vogel. Review. Sx, Sy, Sz eigenstates spinors, matrix representation states and operators as matrices multiplying them. Time dependent perturbations approximations perturbation symmetry . Outline. Time Dependence. We have looked at stationary states

karma
Télécharger la présentation

PH 401

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PH 401 Dr. Cecilia Vogel

  2. Review • Sx, Sy, Sz eigenstates • spinors, matrix representation • states and operators as matrices • multiplying them • Time dependent perturbations • approximations • perturbation symmetry Outline

  3. Time Dependence • We have looked at stationary states • where measurable quantities don’t change at all with time • We have looked at non-stationary states • which develop and change with time • due to the superposition of energy levels • What about a system in a stationary state • that changes due to some external interaction • called a perturbation?

  4. Unperturbed System • Let’s assume that we have solved the TISE • for the UNperturbed syste • with UNperturbed Hamitonian Ho. • Ho|yn> = En|yn> • If our system begins in state • |y>=Scn|yn> • where cn=amplitude for state |yn> • then at time t, it will evolve to • |y>=Scne-iEnt/|yn> • Note that the probability of any state |yn> is still |cn|2. The unperturbed system will not change energy levels.

  5. Perturbing the System • Now let’s add a perturbing potential that depends on time • for example, it may be something we turn on at time t that wasn’t there before, it may be something that oscillates with time, like a light wave, etc • The full Hamiltonian is then • H=Ho+Vpert(t). • (Note: what I call Vpert(t), your text calls H1)

  6. Perturbed System • If our system begins in state • |y>=Scn(0)|yn> • where cn(0)= initial amplitude for state |yn> • then at time t, it will evolve to • |y>=Scn(t)e-iEnt/|yn> • Because the perturbation depends on time, the amplitudes also depend on time. • The probability of any state |yn> changes with time. The perturbed system can indeed change energy levels. • Let’s see how….

  7. TDSE • The state of our system • |y>=Scn(t)e-iEnt/|yn> • must obey the TDSE • not the TISE, because it is not a stationary state of the full Hamiltonian • Plug into TDSE: • H|y>=i∂|y>/∂t • (Ho+Vpert(t)) Scn(t)e-iEnt/|yn>= i∂/∂t Scn(t)e-iEnt/|yn> • S(En+Vpert(t)) cn(t)e-iEnt/|yn>= i[ S(-iEn/)cn(t)e-iEnt/|yn>+ Sc’n(t)e-iEnt/|yn>] • Sooo… • S cn(t)e-iEnt/Vpert(t)|yn>= i Sc’n(t)e-iEnt/|yn>

  8. Diff Eqn for Amplitudes • Sooo… • S cn(t)e-iEnt/Vpert(t)|yn>= i Sc’n(t)e-iEnt/|yn> • One more step to give us numbers rather than states: • Take an overlap of this with some final state |yf> • we can do this for any and all possible |yf>, so we don’t lose generality. • < yf|S cn(t)e-iEnt/Vpert(t)|yn>= < yf|i Sc’n(t)e-iEnt/|yn> • i c’f(t)e-iEft/=S cn(t)e-iEnt/< yf|Vpert(t)|yn> • c’f(t)=(-i/) S cn(t)ei(Ef-En)t/< yf|Vpert(t)|yn>

  9. Time Dependence of c(t) • Thus the amplitudes evolve according to • c’f(t)=(-i/) S cn(t)ei(Ef-En)t/< yf|Vpert(t)|yn> • This is a differential equation relating the derivative of any of the cn’s to the values of all the (infinitely many) other cn’s. OMG  • We will not solve this, except in an approximate way. • If we assume that the perturbation is weak and we don’t wait too long, • then the state does not change much from what it was initially.

  10. 1st Order Approximation • If we assume that the state does not change much from what it was initially. • ci=1, all other cn=0 • Thus the amplitudes evolve according to • c’f(t)=(-i/) ei(Ef-Ei)t/< yf|Vpert(t)|yi> • In this case, the derivative = computable ftn of t, that can in principle be integrate to get c(t).

  11. Matrix Element • The amplitudes evolve according to • c’f(t)=(-i/) ei(Ef-Ei)t/< yf|Vpert(t)|yi> • The evolution depends on the quantity • < yf|Vpert(t)|yi> • which is called a matrix element of the perturbing potential. • The matrix element is important, because it tells us what states can and cannot be excited by the potential. • If the matrix element is zero, then • c’f(t)=0, and cf(t) remains zero for all time • that state does not get excited by the potential

  12. Symmetry and Matrix Element • Under what circumstances is • < yf|Vpert(t)|yi>=0? • and thus incapable of exciting that state? • If Vpert commuteswith Q, then • |yf> and |yi> cannot have different eigenvalues of Q • and Vpert cannot change the eigenvalue of Q • Proof: • Consider initial and final states with initial and final eigenvalues of Q = qi and qf • < yf|QVpert|yi>= < yf|VpertQ|yi> since they commute. • qf < yf|Vpert|yi>= qi< yf|Vpert|yi> • So… either qi = qf, or < yf|Vpert|yi>=0

  13. Symmetry Example • If Vpert commuteswith Q, then • |yf> and |yi> cannot have different eigenvalues of Q • and Vpert cannot change the eigenvalue of Q • Example: • If Vpert = Vpert (y,z) is not a function of x. • then Vpert commutes with px. • and this perturbation cannot change the particle’s x-component of momentum. • Classical analogue: If V does not depend on x, then there is no force in the x-dir and px does not change. • Example: • If Vpert = Vpert (r,q) is not a function of f. • then Vpert commutes with Lz. • and this perturbation cannot change the particle’s z-component of angular momentum

  14. PAL

More Related