1 / 6

Public Revenue from Wind Farms

Public Revenue from Wind Farms. May 2008 Susan Skalka. Current Public Revenues . Ppty Taxes: Determined by municipality, no standard calculation $153,995 to Searsburg in 2001, PPM offered $240,000 for proposed expansion

karsen
Télécharger la présentation

Public Revenue from Wind Farms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Revenue from Wind Farms May 2008 Susan Skalka

  2. Current Public Revenues • Ppty Taxes: • Determined by municipality, no standard calculation • $153,995 to Searsburg in 2001, PPM offered $240,000 for proposed expansion • Sheffield will pay $520,000 annually to mitigation fund, ppty taxes • H.520, Sec. 5402c: Fee based on production • $0.00225 in fiscal year 2009 • $0.0025 in fiscal year 2010 • $0.003 in fiscal year 2011 and thereafter

  3. Potential Public Revenue • Capture economic rent on profits created not by producers, but by nature and the market • Different fiscal structures could be used • Economic analysis by energy economist would be needed to determine which would work best • Would need to not discourage production of wind energy • Instead of taxing production (which is a cost), take portion of economic rent (not a cost) • Revenue could go into a fund • Fund management would need to be discussed

  4. Proposed Guidelines • Progressive Profit Tax • Percent of royalties taken increases as profits increase • Fiscal Structure should take into account age of facility: • New and older facilities have smaller percentage, those in their prime have highest percent

  5. Estimates for Discussion • 2002 Study*: VT could produce 10% of electric energy from 6 wind-farms,with about 150 1.5 MW wind turbines = 225MW total • Vermont Net generation: 7,084,344MWH/year (EIA) x 10% = 708,434.4MWH/yr • =708,434,400 KWH/yr • Check: • 225,000 kW x 24hrs/day x 365 days=1,971,000,000 KWH/yr • x .35 (capacity factor) = 689,850,000kwh/yr • X * 5.6 cents per kWh est. cost * = $38,631,600 • Assume 6.6 cents per kwh* selling price** x 689,850,000kwh/yr = $45,530,100 - $38,631,600 = $6,898,500.00 • Assume 10.6 cents per kwh* selling price** x 689,850,000kwh/yr = $73,124,100 - $38,631,600 = $34,492,500 • Assume 30.6 cents per kwh* selling price** x 689,850,000kwh/yr = $211,094,100 - $38,631,600 = $172,462,500 http://www.revermont.org/windfarm_benefits.pdf* http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/moveabletype/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=850**

  6. Conclusion Vermont should complete an analysis and be prepared to share profits/ economic rent with wind industry as profits from wind-produced power grow due to factors other than work put in by wind company.

More Related