1 / 15

Status of the work of RTCA SC-202 Co-Chairs:

Status of the work of RTCA SC-202 Co-Chairs:. T-PED’s & Commercial Airplanes: Assessing the Risk & What To Do About It. Define T-PED’s T ransmitting - P ortable E lectronic D evices Define the Risks of T-PED’s to Aviation Safety Explain the purpose of RTCA SC-202

kartis
Télécharger la présentation

Status of the work of RTCA SC-202 Co-Chairs:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of the work of RTCA SC-202 Co-Chairs:

  2. T-PED’s & Commercial Airplanes:Assessing the Risk & What To Do About It • Define T-PED’s • Transmitting - Portable Electronic Devices • Define the Risks of T-PED’s to Aviation Safety • Explain the purpose of RTCA SC-202 • Review the committee findings & recommendations • Address the committee’s remaining tasks

  3. Defining The Risk Of T-PED’s Unlike Avionics Systems installed on airplanes, T-PED’s are consumer electronics, purchased from retail outlets and used by consumers without specific training

  4. Distance to the moon 384,000 kilometers Human Hair 40 µmeters Defining The Risk of T-PED’s: Radio Sensitivity & Relative Signal Strengths If the distance to the moon is compared to the transmitting power of a commercial airliner’s VHF radio , then the width of a human hair can break VHF squelch.

  5. Assessing The Risk Of T-PED’s T-PED emissions may reach antennas used by sensitive airplane navigation and communications receivers. Unlike HIRF, the RF source is inside the airplane.

  6. Assessing The Risk of T-PED’s Emissions from T-PED’s may be picked up by airplane wiring or nearby airplane systems devices themselves. Again, unlike HIRF, the RF source is inside the airplane.

  7. Maintaining and Enhancing Aviation Safety:RTCA Special Committee 202 • The FAA requested that RTCA, Inc. form a special committee to present an up-to-date evaluation of the use of portable electronic devices (PED’s). • Particular attention was to be paid towards intentional transmitters such as mobile phones, wireless RF network devices, and other wireless-enabled devices such as personal digital assistants (T-PED’s). • Phase 1 – current T-PED technologies • Phase 2 – upcoming, next-generation T-PED technologies plus guidance for airplane design and certification.

  8. RTCA SC-202 Schedule August 1996 SC-177 Document Completed April 1963 SC-88 Document Completed September 1988 SC-156 Document Completed Previous PED Committees 1996 1963 January 2003 FAA Request October 2004 SC-202 Phase 1 Document Completed May 2003 First Meeting Phase 2 Special Committee SC-202 – Phase 1 2003 2005

  9. Committee Representation • Regulatory Agencies FAA (Flight Standards, Aircraft Certification, Spectrum Management), UK-CAA, Transport Canada, DGAC-France, FCC • Airlines United, Delta Air Lines, US Airways, Continental, Northwest, American, Lufthansa, JAL, ANA, FedEx, UPS, Southwest, QANTAS, Air Wisconsin, ANA • Airplane Manufacturers Airbus, Cessna, Boeing, Bombardier • Avionics Manufacturers Rockwell-Collins, Honeywell, Connexion, Matsushita, General Dynamics, Teledyne, AirCell, Row 44 • Consumer Electronics Verizon, Intel, Sony-Erickson, Panasonic, QUALCOMM, XCube Communications, CEA, Sony, Motorola, Dell, CTIA, Freescale Semiconductor • Associations, Universities, Agencies NASA, UofOK, ARINC, SITA, ALPA, AFA, IATA, EUROCAE, Carnegie Mellon • Aviation IndustryConsultants CAVOK International, Alion, Eagle’s Wings, AJ Systems, Overlook Systems

  10. Accomplishments • Developed and published guidance on a regulatory approval process for selective use of T-PED technologies. • Provided examples of: • Characterization of current wireless technologies • Applicable aircraft avionics operating standards • Flight critical systems categorization • Mitigation of potential T-PED effects • Guidance for PED policies and procedures development • passenger and public education goals • Recommended revisions to FAA AC 91.21-1A. • Proposed FAR revisions to incorporate PED Usage Signage. • Published recommendations on acceptable and enforceable use of T-PED geared towards: • Airlines, • Airplane Manufacturers, • Consumer Electronics Industry, • Regulatory Authorities, and • Consumers.

  11. Maintaining and Enhancing Aviation Safety:Continuing Efforts • Refining recommendations for: • T-PED design • Aircraft design and certification • Operational risk mitigation. • Assess and Characterize additional T-PED Technologies • Ultrawideband devices • Pico-Cell Technology • Wireless Medical Devices • Active RFID Tag Technology. • Assess and recommend FAA regulation revisions to address allowable PEDs (Part 14 CFR 91.21 and 121.306). • Increasing coordination with EUROCAE Working Group 58. • Validation of the end-to-end process.

  12. Maintaining and Enhancing Aviation Safety:RF Emission Limits Assessment • Coordination with: • Regulatory Authorities • Consumer Electronics Industry • Avionics Manufacturers • Develop recommendations for RF emission limit changes for consumer portable electronic devices • explore the possibilities for regulatory middle ground between Aviation Industry emissions requirements, and existing FCC limits for the Consumer Electronics Industry

  13. Maintaining and Enhancing Aviation Safety:Airplane Design and Certification • Defining recommendations for Airplane Design and Certification: • address tolerance to intentional transmissions and spurious emissions • Identify PED environments to support: • Aircraft certification • System certification – STC • If required, identify changes to equipment RF susceptibility • Will be a separate DO-yyy document • Completion after final update to DO-294 • Will build upon process and guidelines in DO-294 • Work to define common document with EUROCAE Working Group 58 • Expected completion July 2007

  14. RTCA SC-202 Schedule July 2007 Design & Certification Document Completed December 2006 Document Publication Recommendation March 2006 Phase 1 Document Update Released 1st Qtr 2007 SC-202 Phase 2 Document Released July 2006 Draft Document Completed October 2004 SC-202 Phase 1 Document Completed Phase 2 Tasks In Work Comment Review DO-YYY work 2004 2007

  15. Concluding Remarks • Committee efforts provide level playing field for T-PEDs impact assessment. • Making progress towards acceptable and enforceable policies and processes for the allowance of passenger and crew use of T-PEDs. • Replacing anecdotal understanding of T-PED operation on aircraft with a common facts-based understanding of the T-PED impacts and situation. • Developing recommendations and process for operational allowance plans and for airplane design and certification • Further information on RTCA and SC-202 available at http://www.rtca.org/

More Related