1 / 6

WHO Guidelines for treatment monitoring

WHO Guidelines for treatment monitoring. Nathan Ford Dept of HIV/AIDS World Health Organization. WHO ART guidelines evolution. Vitoria M, et al, Current Opinions HIV/AIDS, 2013. WHO ART guidelines evolution. Earlier initiation. Simpler treatment. Less toxic, more robust regimens.

kateb
Télécharger la présentation

WHO Guidelines for treatment monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WHO Guidelines for treatment monitoring Nathan FordDept of HIV/AIDSWorld Health Organization

  2. WHO ART guidelines evolution Vitoria M, et al, Current Opinions HIV/AIDS, 2013

  3. WHO ART guidelines evolution Earlier initiation Simpler treatment Less toxic, more robust regimens Better monitoring Vitoria M, et al, Current Opinions HIV/AIDS, 2013

  4. Recommendations on ART Monitoring • Viral load is recommended as the preferred monitoring approach to diagnose and confirm ARV treatment failure • (strong recommendation, low-quality evidence) • If viral load is not routinely available, CD4 count and clinical monitoring should be used to diagnose treatment failure • (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence) • Definition of virological failure: plasma viral load above 1000 copies/ml based on two consecutive viral load measurements after 3 months, with adherence support (6 months post ART) • Higher threshold for DBS and point-of-care technologies

  5. Implementation considerations • ART access should be the first priority: Lack of laboratory tests for monitoring treatment response should not be a barrier to initiating ART • Prioritization: If viral load availability is limited, it should be phased in using a targeted approach to confirm treatment failure. • This may be particularly relevant in populations receiving ARVs to reduce HIV transmission, such as pregnant and breastfeeding women and in sero-discordant couples.

  6. Implementation considerations • Feasibility of phasing in VL capacity (DBS) • PoC viral load on horizon • Enables monitoring of treatment for prevention • Equity • Cost-effectiveness influenced by monitoring approach (frequency, additive or as replacement to CD4)

More Related