1 / 10

Dan Ryan Fall 2012

Dan Ryan Fall 2012. Division of Social Sciences . Centola , et al.: “Emperor’s Dilemma…”. What mechanism permits survival of unpopular (even socially harmful) norms?. Mechanism/Trajectory?. True Believers. Privately Reject Norm. Inferred Willingness to Conform. Imputed

katy
Télécharger la présentation

Dan Ryan Fall 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dan Ryan Fall 2012 Division of Social Sciences

  2. Centola, et al.: “Emperor’s Dilemma…” • What mechanism permits survival of unpopular (even socially harmful) norms?

  3. Mechanism/Trajectory? True Believers Privately Reject Norm Inferred Willingness to Conform Imputed Willingness to Enforce Observed Conformity Importance of Appearing to Support Norm Norm Appears Popular Suggests Anti-Social-ness My Conformity Is Insincere Values Behind It Appear “Social”

  4. "the illusion of transparency" • Tendency to over-estimate visibility of my own internal states Privately Reject Norm Casually Appear To Follow Norm Signal to Other Rejecters _ Change Importance of Appearing to Support Norm illusion of transparency

  5. "illusion of sincerity"? (278.5) • How to show you are not just sensitive to peer pressure but are in fact a true believer? • Enforcing not just conformity but commitment • Increases P(true believer is phony)

  6. Hechter: Order in Heterogeneous Societies Two Theories • Contract: individual trades freedom for order • Internalization: society gets in our heads • But how does 2 work in heterogeneous society? • Groups that minimize externalities generated by their differences are allowed to police themselves • NOTE: same as with individuals?

  7. Groups that Control Externalities More Tolerated

  8. Same with Individuals? • Behavior without externalities less controlled?

  9. Hechter, et al. • Main Point: Global order enhanced with freedom of association & local solidarity, especially for marginal members of society

More Related