1 / 4

The Skills Consortium work programme

The Skills Consortium work programme. Research and evidence Ian Wardle – work group co-ordinator. Work group members. Consortium executive Owen Bowden-Jones – RCPsych Colin Bradbury (for Paul Hayes) – NTA Jason Gough – SU rep / Patient Opinion Linda Harris – RCGP Diana Powell – Barnsley

kaycee
Télécharger la présentation

The Skills Consortium work programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Skills Consortiumwork programme Research and evidence Ian Wardle – work group co-ordinator

  2. Work group members • Consortium executive • Owen Bowden-Jones – RCPsych • Colin Bradbury (for Paul Hayes) – NTA • Jason Gough – SU rep / Patient Opinion • Linda Harris – RCGP • Diana Powell – Barnsley • Marcus Roberts (for Martin Barnes) – DrugScope • Louise Sell – GMW • Kim Wolfe (for Andy Ashenhurst) – AHEAD • Co-options: • Mike Ashton – Drug and Alcohol Findings • David Marteau – DH Offender Health • Mike McCarron – Scotland • Nicola Singleton - UKDPC

  3. Research and evidence brief • We will develop a sector-led consensus and approach to developing the evidence base and the body of research to support effective treatment systems, focusing on emerging thinking about recovery-oriented treatment systems, practice and communities. We will work with relevant research bodies, government departments and clinical institutes to inform their priorities and approach.

  4. A matrix for considering available evidence and gaps

More Related