1 / 18

Research at the Standards Boards AAA-Government & Nonprofit Midyear Meeting

Research at the Standards Boards AAA-Government & Nonprofit Midyear Meeting. Speakers: Dean Mead, Kim Petrone, and Cullen Walsh Moderator: Terry Patton March 28, 2014.

keanu
Télécharger la présentation

Research at the Standards Boards AAA-Government & Nonprofit Midyear Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research at the Standards BoardsAAA-Government & Nonprofit Midyear Meeting Speakers: Dean Mead, Kim Petrone, and Cullen Walsh Moderator: Terry Patton March 28, 2014 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenters. Official positions of the FASB and GASB on accounting matters are determined only after extensive due process and deliberation.

  2. Overview • Introduction to research at the FASB, GASB, and FAF • Research interactions with academia and other stakeholders • Questions and answers

  3. Research at the FASB

  4. Research Objectives • Pre-agenda research • What is the financial reporting issue? • Is the issue pervasive? • Can we identify the proper scope? • Are there one or more cost-effective solutions that would be acceptable to the Board and stakeholders? • Active project research • Gather evidence about costs and benefits

  5. Research Types

  6. Characteristics of Research Useful to FASB Timely Ability to connect research immediately and directly to the topic at hand…before standards setter needs to make a decision Comprehensive Comprehensive analysis of the entire issue all at once…rather than only focusing on a narrow aspect of a broader issue Presentation Emphasis on answering the question…rather than emphasis on the process used to arrive at the answer Conclusive Conclusions that are free from qualifications or multiple interpretations Challenge = Understandability of research by non-academics 6

  7. Research at the GASB

  8. GASB Research Activities • Research serves the GASB’s overall mission of setting standards that support decision making and accountability Pre-agenda research Additional research during deliberations Evaluation of emerging issues

  9. GASB Research Questions in General • How pervasive is the issue among governments? • Number and types of governments affected • Magnitude of the transactions • How have other standards setters dealt with the issue? • What has been the experience with those standards? • What are the major facets of the issue? • What are the potential solutions? • What information do users need? • How pervasive is that need? • How would they use the information?

  10. GASB Research Methods

  11. Leveraging the Work of the Academics • Gil Crain Memorial Research Grant Program • One or more grants each year • Research to be completed within approximately one year • Potential topics are suggested in the request for proposals, but the GASB is open to considering other topics • GASB involvement in other research efforts

  12. Research at the FAF’s Post-Implementation Review

  13. PIR Research Objectives • Help determine whether standard accomplish stated purpose • Did the standard resolve the issues underlying its need? • Is decision-useful information being reported to and used by users of financial statements? • Is the standard operational? • Did any significant unexpected changes to reporting or operating practices result? • Did any significant unanticipated consequences result?

  14. PIR Research Procedures • Review project archives (pre and post-issuance) • Interview stakeholders, Board members, project staff • Survey stakeholders • Review academic literature • Other • Financial statements • Technical inquiries • Firm guides • Analyst reports • SEC comment letters, restatements

  15. Findings from Academic Literature Reviews • Resolve underlying need? • FAS 131: Increase in reported segments • Providing decision useful information? • FAS 109: Income tax information is value relevant • FAS 131: Improved investors’ ability to value companies with significant foreign operations • FAS 141R: market incorporates fair value of contingent consideration • Unanticipated consequences? • FIN 48: Change in company tax strategies

  16. Role of Academics in PIR Process • Academic consultant • Provides expertise on topic • Provides an independent and objective perspective • Helps develop unbiased survey questions • Summarizes academic research and relationship to PIR objectives • Assists in data analysis • Participation in PIR surveys • Register to participate on FAF website

  17. Research Interactions with Academia and Other Stakeholders Questions from the Moderator

  18. Open Q&A

More Related