1 / 27

INVESTIGACION

This article explores the methodologies employed in Latin America's FONDECYT initiative, aimed at enhancing the research output and productivity of academic institutions. Emphasizing the importance of proper indexing and access to comprehensive databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and various agricultural science collections, we delve into best practices for researchers. Key considerations for journal selection, funding for research teams, and strengthening networks through conferences are discussed, contributing to the overall improvement of scientific quality and visibility in the region.

keefe-allen
Télécharger la présentation

INVESTIGACION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INDEXACION PUBLICAR INVESTIGACION RANKINGS FONDECYT PRODUCTIVIDAD Dr. Ricardo Soto

  2. RANKINGS

  3. LatinAmericaMethodology

  4. INDEXACION

  5. HINARI Access to Research in HealthProgramme Horticultural ScienceAbstracts INSPEC JournalCitationReports: ScienceEdition MEDLINE Meteorological and GeoastrophysicalAbstracts Nutrition and FoodSciencesDatabase ParasitologyDatabase PlantGeneticResourcesAbstracts PlantGenetics and BreedingDatabase PlantProtectionDatabase PollutionAbstracts ProQuestAdvanced Technologies and AerospaceCollection ProQuestAgriculturalScienceCollection ProQuest Natural ScienceCollection ProQuestSciTechCollection ProQuestTechnologyCollection ProtozoologicalAbstracts PubMed PubMed Central Review of Medical and VeterinaryEntomology Review of Medical and VeterinaryMycology RiskAbstracts ScienceCitationIndex Scopus SoilScienceDatabase Soils and FertilizersAbstracts SustainabilityScienceAbstracts Tropical DiseasesBulletin VeterinaryBulletin VeterinaryScienceDatabase WorldAgriculturalEconomics and Rural SociologyAbstracts Zentralblatt MATH Database (zbMATH) Zoological Record AbstractsonHygiene and CommunicableDiseases AcademicOneFile AcademicSearch Complete AgriculturalEconomicsDatabase AgriculturalEngineeringAbstracts AgroforestryAbstracts Animal BehaviorAbstracts Animal BreedingAbstracts Animal ProductionDatabase AquaticScience and FisheriesAbstracts (ASFA) BiologicalAbstracts BiologicalSciences BIOSIS Previews Biotechnology and BioEngineeringAbstracts BotanicalPesticides CAB Abstracts Calcium and CalcifiedTissueAbstracts ChemicalAbstractsService (CAS) CINAHL Plus with Full Text CSA EngineeringResearchDatabase CSA NeurosciencesAbstracts CSA TechnologyResearchDatabase Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) EBSCO Discovery Service EBSCOhostConnection EcologyAbstracts EMBASE EntomologyAbstracts EnvironmentAbstracts EnvironmentalImpact EnvironmentalSciences and Pollution Management ForestScienceDatabase GeneticsAbstracts Global Health Google Scholar Health and Safety ScienceAbstracts HelminthologicalAbstracts

  6. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/

  7. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/expert-systems-with-applications/http://www.journals.elsevier.com/expert-systems-with-applications/

  8. http://www.scopus.com/

  9. Publicaciones ISI 2013 (fuente: conicyt)

  10. Publicaciones ISI al 6/2014 (fuente: web of science)

  11. FONDECYT

  12. Financiamiento para: -Tesistas/memoristas -Personal Técnico -Viajes -Gastos de operación -Bienes de capital

  13. Aquellos(as) Investigadores(as) Responsables que obtengan un puntaje menor a 2 (de 5) en evaluación curricular no continuarán a la segunda etapa de evaluación del proyecto.

  14. PRODUCTIVIDAD ACREDITACION POSTGRADO

  15. PUBLICAR

  16. Consideraciones importantes para elección de revista -Scope -Factor de impacto -Calidad y prestigio -Comité evaluador -Tiempo de revisión -Tiempo de publicación -Costo

  17. Formación de equipos de investigación -Ayudantes de investigación -Alumnos memoristas/tesistas -Personal de apoyo técnico (por ej: redacción científica en inglés) -Redes de contactos: -Otras áreas misma institución -Otras instituciones nacionales e internacionales -Asistir a conferencias

More Related