1 / 12

James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 5-August-2010

Endcap Notes. James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 5-August-2010. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010. Comparison w/ track-based. Direct comparison is slightly misleading Correlations not simple Can compare PseudoRPhi No track-based sensitivity to Z

keefe
Télécharger la présentation

James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 5-August-2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Endcap Notes James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 5-August-2010 James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010

  2. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 Comparison w/ track-based • Direct comparison is slightly misleading • Correlations not simple • Can compare PseudoRPhi • No track-based sensitivity to Z • No hardware sensitivity to PseudoR (along SLM) • Let ring float for best fit to hardware positions • Let transfer plates float (only know by PG)

  3. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 Comparison w/ track-based Track-based connects chambers in rings Hardware connects chambers along lines Lines are fixed wrt each other by PG Let rings float Let transfer plates float

  4. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 Fit allowing transfer plates to move • Fit to minimize track-hardware chamber center residuals in Pseudo-Rphi, letting SLMs float • Fit moves SLM centers by an average of 0.6mm, with an rms of 1.2mm • Expected PG accuracy is about 0.3mm • It rotates the SLM’s by angles with rms of 0.21mrad • About 1.5mm rms shifts in transfer plate phi position • Fit only done for stations with SLMs and 2 rings: No ME4 or ME1 • Quoted numbers from last week were not duplicated

  5. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 Fit decreases residual mean and improves RMS of residual Except here

  6. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 Further work • Not at 0.6mm level • It ought to be • Use variant of Oleg’s fit instead of Cocoa • Compare to PG instead of tracking

  7. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 BACKUP • Histograms of raw residuals track-hardware and residuals after the fit

  8. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 PseudoRPhi Comparison by ring: ME+2 and ME+3 Raw residuals ME+2 ME+3 Ring 1 Ring 2

  9. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 PseudoRPhi Comparison by ring: ME+2 and ME+3 Fit residuals ME+2 ME+3 Ring 1 Ring 2

  10. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 PseudoRPhi Comparison by ring: ME-2 and ME-3 Raw residuals ME+2 ME+3 Ring 1 Ring 2

  11. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 PseudoRPhi Comparison by ring: ME-2 and ME-3 Fit residuals ME+2 ME+3 Ring 1 Ring 2

  12. James N. Bellinger 5-Aug-2010 PseudoRPhi: No change in residual with increasing radius Raw residuals Fit residuals Ring 1 Ring 2

More Related