1 / 32

DN Yields & Time Spectra from p(1 GeV) + 238 U

DN Yields & Time Spectra from p(1 GeV) + 238 U. Chaos in… my presentation but not in physics I will be talking about!. Photons. ELSA. Energy (eV). data for non-destructive interrogation with photons. PhotoNuc: experiment. waste characterization & material detection on borders.

keely
Télécharger la présentation

DN Yields & Time Spectra from p(1 GeV) + 238 U

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DN Yields & Time Spectra from p(1 GeV) + 238U Chaos in… my presentation but not in physics I will be talking about! Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  2. Photons ELSA Energy (eV) • data for non-destructive interrogation with photons PhotoNuc: experiment waste characterization & material detection on borders Delayed neutron & delayed photon measurements 6 groups of {ai, i} He-3 Targets:232Th, 235,238U, 237Np, 239Pu Collaboration Experiments: CEA/DAM+DRT+DEN, Geel BGO D. Doré et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  3. Photons Energy (eV) PhotoNuc: modeling • Contribution of DAPNIA: • 6 major actinide evaluations  ENDF-B/VII • future evaluations for JEFF will include •  extension up to 130 MeV •  fission fragment distributions •  delayed neutron data E. Van Lauwe et al. Collaboration Modeling: LANL, GSI, NRG E. Dupont et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  4. Photons ELSA Energy (eV) PhotoNuc: experiment • Improvement of the old data: 238U,232Th, 235U • Provision of new measurements: 237Np, 239Pu V. Macary et al. 1 2 3 4 5 6  DN energy dependence similar to n-fission  2nd chance fission  ABLA contains the experimental trend M.L. Giacri, A. Van Lauwe et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  5. Photons ELSA Energy (eV) Isotopic identification: Use of delayed neutrons PhotoNuc Use of the new parameterization for uranium enrichment determination from DN decay curves Imix(t) = mU YU(t) + mTh YTh(t) New parameters Experiment Old parameters 238U DN activity 232Th New parameters • impact of the new high precision parameterization! Time (s) D. Doré et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  6. Photons ELSA Energy (eV) Delayed Photons  No available data  DP/fission ~ 10* DN/fission  DP low sensibility to H content  DP/DN  promising INPHO Experiments  Elsa  2 BGO detectors, 5 actinides  Analysis based on ABLA model  {Ai,Ti1/2} groups for the 1st time P. Dighe, E. Berthoumieux et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  7. From photofission to “satellite” projects on DN studies DN Yields & Time Spectra from p(1 GeV) + natFe, natPb, 209Bi, 238U Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  8. Examples (A) J-PARK/JAEA - thanks to H. Nakashima Delayed neutrons Prompt neutrons • short Hg transit time  delayed neutron (DN) activity Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  9. Examples (B) MegaPie/PSI - thanks to F. Groeschel DN/PN = ? Successful operation for 4 months in 2006! ~5.3 m DN and PN estimates using MCNPX+CINDER’90 Φn (DN)~ 106 n/(s cm2) Φn (PN)~ 106 n/(s cm2) Important: DN yields are very sensitive to the choice of physics models and no data were found! D. Ridikas et al., Proc. of PHYSOR2006, Vancouver, Canada. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  10. DN measurements from p (1GeV)+Pb at PNPI Gatchina (Russia) PNPI synchrocyclotron Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  11. Experimental strategy • He-3 counter calibration: • 252Cf neutron source + Monte Carlo • Proton beam monitoring: • 27Al foils and gamma spectroscopy from 22Na, 24Na and 7Be • Measurement strategy: • No target at all – long irradiations • Concrete block – long irradiation • Iron thick target – long irradiations • Lead target of variable thickness; • short (350 s), intermediate (20 s) and long (300 s) irradiations Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  12. Proton beam monitoring Beam size/profile: by photo-films at exit and entrance positions Beam intensity: by 27Al foils and gamma spectroscopy from 22Na, 24Na and 7Be Photo-films 1GeV protons Al foils • 27Al(p,x)7Be monitor reaction cross section7.5  0.3 mb was taken as a reference • ratios of 24Na &22Na with respect to 7Be were equal to 1.73  0.15 & 1.99  0.07 •  uncertainty in proton beam monitoring from 8 % to 12 % Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  13. DN decay curve: p + natPb (55 cm) • “Understandable” from x-sections • p(1GeV)+Pb  9Li ~ 1000 b • p(1GeV)+Pb  17N ~ 600 b • p(1GeV)+Pb  87Br ~ 33 b D. Ridikas et al., EPJA 32 (2007) Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  14. Why only 4 exponentials are sufficient? Production of Br isotopes T1/2 (s) 55.6 16.0 4.4 1.8 0.18 U fission Pb fission; low energy  high energy Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  15. Reproduced with 4 major contributions : 9Li, 17N,88Br, and 87Br DN decay curves: p + natPb, 209Bi A. Prévost et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  16. The same 4 major contributions : 9Li, 17N,88Br, and 87Br DN decay curves: p + 209Bi A. Prévost et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  17. Experimental precursor yields (atoms/proton) 17N 87Br 88Br 17N • Saturation seems observed • for targets thicker than 20 cm • Similar shapes and absolute values both for Pb and Bi 87Br 88Br Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  18. INC (JAM) + EVAP(GEM) JAM: Jet AA Microscopic Transport Model GEM: Generalized Evaporation Model H. Iwase, K. Niita, T. Nakamura, Journal of Nuclear Science & Technology 39 (2002) 1142. Precursor yields: data versus PHITS simulations Pb 17N 87Br 88Br  Predictions within a factor of 2! V. Blideanu et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  19. Physics: ratios of relative yields relative to 87Br Experiment stable decreasing  Produced by different reaction mechanisms Confirmed by PHITS predictions V. Blideanu et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  20. Extraction of x-sections : 17N & 87,88Br Using thin targets  Good agreement with old data and/or systematics! D. Ridikas et al., EPJA 32 (2007) Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  21. Absolute DN production yields: consequences Assumption: p(1GeV) + Pb (55 cm thick; 10 cm ) at 1mA (1 MW) • Important data for: • SNS based on liquid metal targets • ToF facilities (DNs background neutrons) Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  22. Conclusions and outlook • importance of DN in liquid metal high-power targets for radioprotection issues • importance of the measurements to test model calculations • DN yields and time spectra measured for the 1st time for p(1GeV) on thick natPb and Bi targets • Estimates of errors on DN decay curves : below 20 % • Major contributors are: 87Br, 88Br and 17N  extraction of x-sections • PHITS code “recommended” for such studies • Consequences and “in-situ” experiment… Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  23. CEA/DSM/DAPNIA’s contribution for MegaPie S. Panebianco et al. ~2-3m 3He  Delayed neutrons  Prompt neutrons A. Letourneau et al. Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  24. … and if one comes back to physics Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  25. DN yield as a function of incident neutron energy p(1GeV) + 238U in Nov. 2007 What is beyond 20 MeV? Thanks to P. Romain et al. CEA/DIF/DPTA Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  26. Production of Br isotopes: dependence on energy T1/2 (s) 55.6 16.0 4.4 1.8 0.18 U fission Pb fission; low energy  high energy Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  27. p(1GeV)+U GSI data: inverse kinematics Production of 87Br ~3.8 mb * 0.025 0.095 Dostrovsky et al.: from DN curves Nearly a factor of 2! No change with energy? Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  28. Modeling of DNs in 3 steps: p(1GeV)+238U 2) Summation of Y(A,Z)*Pn according to T1/2 1) INCL4+ABLA for Y(A,Z) ----------Group 2------------------ Y*Pn, *10e6 T1/2,s Ba144 g - 9.26051 - 11.500 Br88 g - 25.1614 - 16.290 Te136 g - 1.62791 - 17.630 I137 g - 28.16053 - 24.500 Cs141 g - 0.21140 - 24.940 Total: 64.42184 <T1/2>: 19.25251 3) Construction of DN tables T1/2, s Yn*Pn, x 106 g1: 55.598 13.83926 g2: 19.252 64.42184 g3: 4.975 48.61182 g4: 2.051 124.89912 g5: 0.450 38.10098 g6: 0.197 12.99792 <T1/2>=9.397 Total: 303.3795 Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  29. Photo of the experimental setup: p(1GeV)+238U Nov. 2007 PNPI Gatchina Al foil 238U + Al foil • 0.3mm, 1cm & 2cm thick 238U targets • 3cm x 3cm Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  30. “Raw” experimental data: p(1GeV)+ 238U  DNs signal • 1 bunch – 2 s; channel=5ms • 20 s – 100 s; channel=0.2s • 300 s – 300 s; channel = 0.2s signal background background “background”  empty Al envelope Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  31. “Raw” data versus modeling T1/2, s ai, x 106 g1: 55.598 13.83926 g2: 19.252 64.42184 g3: 4.975 48.61182 g4: 2.051 124.89912 g5: 0.450 38.10098 g6: 0.197 12.99792 + g8 (N17): 4.173s ~450 g9 (Li9): 0.178s ~2500 T1/2, s Yn*Pn, x 106 g1: 55.598 13.83926 g2: 19.252 64.42184 g3: 4.975 48.61182 g4: 2.051 124.89912 g5: 0.450 38.10098 g6: 0.197 12.99792 <T1/2>=9.397 Total: 303.3795 Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

  32. From the DN decay curve: p (1GeV)+ U Short lived fragmentation products dominate over longed lived fission products (?!) • “Understandable” from x-sections • p(1GeV)+U p(1GeV)+Pb • in ( * Pn) due to production of • 9Li ~1.7 mb * 0.510 0.87 0.51 • 17N ~1.1 mb * 0.950 1.05 0.57 • 87Br ~3.8 mb * 0.025 0.10 0.0008 • 88Br ~2.9 mb * 0.066 0.19 0.0009 Detailed analysis in progress as a part of PhD thesis by G. Stankunas Contact: ridikas@cea.fr

More Related