1 / 19

Voice quality, rhythm and valorized femininities

Voice quality, rhythm and valorized femininities. Patrick Callier Georgetown University Sociolinguistics Symposium 18, 9/2/2010. Voice quality—review. Voice quality as index of speaker emotional or physical state e.g. creak = resignation (Laver 1980)

kenda
Télécharger la présentation

Voice quality, rhythm and valorized femininities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Voice quality, rhythm and valorized femininities Patrick Callier Georgetown University Sociolinguistics Symposium 18, 9/2/2010

  2. Voice quality—review • Voice quality as index of speaker emotional or physical state • e.g. creak = resignation (Laver 1980) • Mass mediated representations of voice quality quite diverse • Teshigawara 2003 • reveals anime heroes’ and villains’ true nature • Starr 2006 • “Sweet” voice quality indexes speaker’s authentic femininity

  3. Rhythm—review • PVI (pairwise variability index): quantitative measure of local fluctuations in duration • Low PVIs usu. = “syllable-timing” (depends what interval you are using) • High PVIs usu. = “stress-timing” • Singaporean English, Spanish both more “syllable-timed” than many of worlds’ languages. • Cantonese, Mandarin, also heavily syllable-timed (Mok 2008).

  4. Rhythm, cont’d. • If what we are measuring is just durational variability (is it?), a measure of sample-wide duration variance should also be informative. • Enter ΔC, the standard deviation of a consonantal interval • Friends: ΔV, ΔS • Normalize for speech rate: VarcoΔC/V/S • Lower = less variability

  5. Sociolinguistics of rhythm • AAE’s transition from syllable-timed to stress-timed (Thomas and Carter 2006) • “Maria’s” adoption of syllable-timing as peer group changes (Carter 2006) • Final lengthening alongside other stylistic markers in unique –er of Australian immigrant English variety (Kiesling 2005)

  6. Data • Nüren hua ‘Women flowers’, 2008 mainland Chinese TV serial drama • Larger study: rhythm and voice quality in 6 characters (3 men, 3 women)

  7. Ouyang Xiu Lin Xuelian http://pic4.sdnews.com.cn/NewsImg/2008/3/5/U2389P28T3D1936726F326DT20080305115506.jpg http://www.hsgd.net.cn/userfiles/323232.jpg

  8. Methods • Voice quality • Identify potential stretches of creak auditorily • In case of ambiguous percept, use Praat to confirm spectral evidence • Measure presence and duration

  9. Methods, cont’d. • Rhythm • Use (normalized) syllabic PVI (nSPVI) and VarcoΔS (Mok 2008) • Use segmental spellings of Chinese orthography as syllabification guide

  10. Results • Divergence in voice quality • Similarity in rhythm

  11. Voice quality Percent creak (secs/sec)

  12. Rhythm

  13. Discussion • Lin is creaky • Also: a widow, trying to seduce the main character’s love interest, a wheeler-and-dealer (cf. Zhang’s [2008] “smooth operator”) • Ouyang is modal (perhaps breathy?) • Married, politically active, a schoolteacher, an accomplished fighter

  14. Discussion, cont’d. • Voice quality may still be indexical of “authentic” femininity or lack thereof • rubrics of valorization are culturally constrained • Modal voice (in contrast to Lin’s creak) valorizes a very martial, revolutionary type of woman

  15. Discussion, cont’d. • And rhythm? • Both relatively stress-timed compared to men • Analysis of rhythm’s social meaning may be enhanced by comparison with other speakers

  16. Conclusion • How to assess the social meaning of rhythm? • Rhythmic measures like PVI are highly variable within individuals • No clear stylistic effect at utterance level (pace Drager, Eckert and Moon 2008) • How do you hear a “rhythm switch”? • Is it all “similarity-to-variety X” type meaning?

  17. Conclusion • And voice quality? • When isn’t it a rheme of “essence”? • As a strategy to expand effective pitch range (Podesva 2007, Mendoza-Denton n.d.)? • What constrains these meanings?

  18. Thanks • Rob Podesva & his Language and Identity class for early feedback • Anastasia Nylund for valuable conversation and idea-swapping • Daanish and Hammad Ahmed for software help • Cala Zubair for hardware help

  19. Contact: Patrick Callier Georgetown University Department of Linguistics prc23@georgetown.edu

More Related