1 / 10

Has Privatization Worked in Latin America?

Has Privatization Worked in Latin America?. Evan Caplan and Kaitlynn Saldanha. Agenda. Former pay-as-you-go (paygo) system Chilean reform Types of privatized systems Privatization across Latin America Transition process Drawbacks Strengths Conclusions. Former PAYGO System.

kenyon
Télécharger la présentation

Has Privatization Worked in Latin America?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Has Privatization Worked in Latin America? Evan Caplan and Kaitlynn Saldanha

  2. Agenda • Former pay-as-you-go (paygo) system • Chilean reform • Types of privatized systems • Privatization across Latin America • Transition process • Drawbacks • Strengths • Conclusions

  3. Former PAYGO System • Public pay-as-you-go system • Payroll taxes on current workers fund current retirees’ benefits • High contribution rates averaging to 26% - 50% of wages • Issues in Chile: • Fragmentation • Limited contribution-benefit association • Significant evasion • Generous entitlements not keeping up with revenue • Deficit of 2.7% GDP needed to be funded by general budget

  4. Chilean Reform - 1981 • Workers pay 10% gross wages to individual account run by a pension fund management company. • Additional 2.6% of wages and small fixed mandatory fee for disability and survivors’ insurance and administrative costs • All contributions tax exempt • Government influence over the pension companies • Limited investment discretion > limited differentiation between firms. • Choices once retirement age reached • Annuity, programmed withdrawals or a combination • Government safety net with guaranteed minimum • 58% active participation by 1998 • 4% still contributing to the old system. 38% not covered by the system; mostly informal workers. • Average rate of return on accumulated funds 1982-1995: 12.8% • 1994-2000: 4.9%

  5. Types of Privatized Systems • Single-tier • Privatized program with individual accounts • Multi-tier • Public programs in addition to privatized • Substitutive model • Private replaces public • Parallel model • Private as alternative to public • Mixed model • Private complements public

  6. Privatization Across Latin America

  7. Transition Process • Must continue to fund current retirees’ pensions while current workers’ money is going into private accounts • Government must fund this burden from general budget • Chile gave workers recognition bonds to account for their accrued pensions at time of transition

  8. Drawbacks • Transition and Administrative costs • Coverage • Noncompliance • Gender disparities • Limited domestic investment opportunities

  9. Strengths • Capital accumulation and capital markets • Insulated from political risk • Labor market incentives • Indexed currency

  10. Conclusions • Privatized Latin American Systems too young for conclusive results and to quantitatively evaluate the performance of recent reforms. • Many problems not solved by privatization including coverage and compliance. Created the problems of high transitional and administrative costs. • Under certain conditions privatization improves capital and labor markets • There is no perfect pension plan that fits all states. Pension policy should ultimately be determined based on the specific characteristics of the state, current market conditions, and evolving demographics.

More Related