1 / 19

P2P: Person-to-Person Decentralized Work

P2P: Person-to-Person Decentralized Work. Gregory Alan Bolcer http://www.endtech.com/ info@endtech.com. Outline. Philosophy Central Argument Case Studies Magi Approach Unique Applications. Philosophy: Centralization. Manage complexity Ensure security of information, control

kera
Télécharger la présentation

P2P: Person-to-Person Decentralized Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P2P: Person-to-Person Decentralized Work Gregory Alan Bolcer http://www.endtech.com/ info@endtech.com

  2. Outline • Philosophy • Central Argument • Case Studies • Magi Approach • Unique Applications

  3. Philosophy: Centralization • Manage complexity • Ensure security of information, control • Performance and scalability: • Leverage economies of scale • What do you have on your desktop? Single CPU or 1000’s of lightweight ones? • Reflects Organizational Boundaries and cost of crossing organizational boundaries is prohibitive • Tools & technology geared toward centralized solutions.

  4. Philosophy: Pure Decentralized • Once you commit, it’s difficult to retract • Allows you to prevent forcible removal of information (good and bad) • No central authority to fix errors, but Increased reliability • reduced vulnerability to attack • graceful degradation of errors • Low cost of communication • Many decentralized systems have centralized component

  5. Cases: Freenet, Gnutella, Napster • Freenet • No form of centralized control or administration. • Virtually impossible to forcibly remove information - doing so distributed content more widely • Authors and Readers may remain anonymous • Demand-based routing and shared storage • Difficult to determine where information is stored • Content is encrypted and distributed • Limitation of legal liability; suitcase and closet • First-come, Key-based access scheme; • Michael Jordan and Barbie problem • Not controlled or dependent upon Domain Naming system; no permanent Internet connection to publish

  6. Cases: Freenet, Gnutella, Napster • Gnutella • No Central Directory • Access-based file availability • Relies on “I’m Here..” static IP addresses • Locational identification • Napster • Centralized User ID directory • Centralized metadata cache • Shared understanding of name and content

  7. Philosophy: Decentralized Work • It is difficult to centralize enterprise data • Knowing when to prevent access is extremely difficult • 70% of enterprise data is not located in a centralized server or database, • it’s on the desktops, laptops, palmtops, PDAs, smartphones, etc. • Need to centrally scale the business logic with access to information “in place” • It is an expensive operation to centralize data, • It’s constantly changing • ERP & Large Database systems have discovered this • Human nature, I want to copy it and do it myself • Human work not easily segmentable, overlap of work leads to social and political problems

  8. Problems with Web for Decentralized Work • No Event backchannel • Web typically client-server • Dynamic data generated on demand polling or refresh for new content • Server can’t initiate connection to client • Routing and Naming difficult • No named clients other than logging client environment • Dynamic IP and dialups • Not truly Ubiquitous

  9. Magi Approach • Goal of Magi to scale the Web beyond the desktop and server to every Internet-enabled device; billions instead of millions • Thin-server on every device to speak HTTP to every other device; WebDAV for writable Web • Similar to Freenet, Gnutella, Napster but doesn’t reinvent the Web; Not just sharing but access • Apache HTTP server & plugins including other p2p protocols • Extensible Java protocol implementations • XML-based access controls using user controlled “Buddy lists” • Dynamic authentication controls

  10. Magi Approach • Access and control of user’s own information • “in place” where it’s stored rather than moving information around the Internet • Namespace controls access and authentication • Claims to namespace map to devices, even if not active • Keys represent users, not content: • Greg’Laptop (Greg’s Laptop) refers to the same installation whether its at work behind a firewall, at home on a DSL connection, or on the road on a dialup connection • URL Mapping: http://endeavors.org/Magi/Dir/Greg’Laptop

  11. Magi Approach • Decentralization of administrative control of authorization and access controls • User’s buddy lists allow permissions • Default directories for default levels of access which include read, read/write, group, owner, and public based on HTTP and WebDAV methods • Permissions can be locally defined or authenticated with a 3rd party server or service • Locational awareness of information provides context for the information • Centralization of Metadata is a cheaper operation than information collection & allows knowledge about offline data

  12. Magi Application GUI: Java & Win32

  13. Magi Architecture Magi Service Apache HTTP Server MagiDAV Xerces XML Engine Jserv Servlet Engine JSDK 2.x Java2 JRE & Java SDK Plugins Apache Module Plugins XML Buddy Lists and ACL & Triggers MagiSWAP WAP Gateway Dynamic DNS Services MagiWAP Magi GUI Online Storage Sites Other protocols & Plugins HTTP Event Service API E-Service Manager Smart Updates Magi Work Folders Inbox Outbox Private Public Shared Services

  14. Centralize Authentication to maintain control and access Centralize Metadata to allow tracking and status, even of offline information Peer to peer nature allows negotiated content and long duration tracking, status, and processing Every Magi server can also be a registration authority Magi Approach to Work

  15. Unique Applications: E-commerce (Now) • Costly to put up e-commerce site • Significant technological barriers to market • Non-standard data and APIs • Information controlled by vendor E-Commerce Web Server Electronic Wallet Content Shopping Cart Ship & Track Credit Card Settlement

  16. Unique Applications: Magi E-commerce Lightweight Web Server • Decentralize Shopping Cart, E-wallet, and settlement services • Putting up a product for sale only requires registering the product • Anyone can become a Vendor • Information Controlled by Purchaser/User Product ID Magi Electronic Wallet Shopping Cart Settlement E-Services Ship & Track

  17. Unique Applications: Home Networking Lightweight Web Server • Remote Control of Networked services • Secure “sphere” of networkable permissions • Access and control own information Service ID Magi Magi

  18. Unique Applications: Streaming Data Using a WAP phone as a remote control, a user can download a media format (QT,MP3,AVI, etc) to his desktop proxy and then stream the contents to any Magi enabled device using current Web technology. If the Magi server is on the phone, the local IrDA or Bluetooth connection can provide the local connection to any other IrDA or Bluetooth device. Magi

  19. Conclusions • Magi is a client side Web application server that provides an event destination • Centralizing metadata and authentication allows maintaining of control and information about disconnected information • Providing access rather than moving data allows work to remain decentralized Http://www.endtech.com/ http://magi.endeavors.org/

More Related