1 / 20

Pr ó-conselho Tool: a participatory methodology for planning and evaluate results.

Pr ó-conselho Tool: a participatory methodology for planning and evaluate results. Ana Cristina Valente Borges AfrEA - NONIE - 3Impact Conference Cairo, Egypt April, 2009. AGENDA Goals and Motivation Background and Context Methodology Indicators Dimensions

kiayada-blanchard
Télécharger la présentation

Pr ó-conselho Tool: a participatory methodology for planning and evaluate results.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pró-conselho Tool: a participatory methodology for planning and evaluate results. Ana Cristina Valente Borges AfrEA - NONIE - 3Impact Conference Cairo, Egypt April, 2009

  2. AGENDA • Goals and Motivation • Background and Context • Methodology • Indicators • Dimensions • Final Considerations

  3. Goals and Motivations • Develop a tool that (1) • Improve potential of development outcomes and results of program • Guarantee a results based approach • Communication of best practices • Could contribute with organizations strengths pushing them to higher levels of practices • Development skills on organizations

  4. Goals and Motivations • Develop a tool that (2) • Promote the knowledge of the strategic use and relationship between information / monitoring / evaluation on planning, managing and building capacity on organizations • Easy to be used and adopted (users with different levels of formal education) • Promote the practice of cross-organizational partnerships

  5. Goals and Motivations • Develop a tool that (3) • Organization development • Access to new technical, human, financial and operational resources • Learning and dissemination of applied knowledge • Part of a system for evaluate the program contribution to development

  6. Background / Context (1) • Tool’s reference: • CSR tool • Brazilian Quality Prize • International Quality Prize models • Recently

  7. Background / Context (2) • Program Nature: • Strength the system of Children and Teenagers rights defense in a State of Brazil • Paritary organizations • 853 cities involved (scale) • Participatory and partnership building process (cross sector and cross organizational) • Program priorities identified in a initial investigation • CSR context • Program stopped between 2007/2008

  8. Background / Context (2) Geographic Localization • State of Minas Gerais • 18 million habitants • 3rd biggest state in Brazil • 853 municipalities

  9. Methodology for tool development (1) • Identification and analysis of existing tools (CSR and NQP); • Consultancy with experts (thematic and process) • First suggested dimensions took from a baseline diagnostic done at the very beginning of the program to identify council priorities; • Participatory process: 8 months to define dimensions and design final version; • - Pilot project with 6 municipalities

  10. Methodology for tool development (2) • Engagement of regional movements for guarantee mayors participation • Each council received its individual report of performance with a consolidated one where his performance is shown in compare with others • Continuous process - to be reviewed each 3 years.

  11. Indicators • Deep (stages of maturity in each dimension can go from zero to best practices) • Binary • Quantitative • “Health competition” - blind compared with pairs

  12. Indicators - Deep ones

  13. Indicators - Binary ones

  14. Indicators - Quantitative ones

  15. Dimensions • History of organization (Councils) • Councilers experience, habilities and profile • Legal Structure • Council management (planning, operation, monitoring and evaluation of process) • Communications, Information management and relationship with society and stakeholders • Public policies and public budget monitoring and deliberations

  16. Achievements • Program training priorities were reviewed • Increasing commitment and engagement of public administration with the cause • Better comprehension of the role of the Councils • Increasing on participation of councilers on Council activities. • State data base of information on Councils

  17. What is up now • (with the program) • Restart of the program and revision of tool’s content (presential and virtual interaction between stakeholders); • National approach; • MG State will held second turn (compare with phase 1 and analysis of if and how the tool was used and by whom) • Notice of Councils that uses the tool as a strategic planning and communication support • - Internet community for discussion: www.vivoconselhos.ning.com

  18. What is up now • (other field aplications) • Education program (schools infrastructure; professors educational and knowledge level; schools pedagogic project; engagement of family and student commitment to studies; etc) • Project to implement a similar process to solidarity economy organizations strength (fairtrade, craft and traditional communities production)

  19. Final considerations • Logic of this tool consider different dimensions for a management for development results strategy and follow up (peculiarities of sector are respect and considered) • Participatory process are mandatory for this initiative (commitment of councils to use and apply direct and indirect knowledge) • First measurements of real contribution of the model for local development will be possible by the end of this year.

  20. THANK YOU! Contacts: ana.borges@sbrasil.org

More Related