1 / 13

Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws

Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws. COMU2020 Phil Graham Week 4. Regulation and Codes of Conduct. Overview of Australian regulatory bodies ABA PRIA ADMA AAA “Codes of Conduct”. Ethics. How do we ask and answer ethical questions? What are “ethics”? How do we identify ethical issues?

kimama
Télécharger la présentation

Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws COMU2020 Phil Graham Week 4

  2. Regulation and Codes of Conduct • Overview of Australian regulatory bodies • ABA • PRIA • ADMA • AAA • “Codes of Conduct”

  3. Ethics • How do we ask and answer ethical questions? • What are “ethics”? • How do we identify ethical issues? • How do these differ from moral issues? • Is there a difference?

  4. Ethics .. cntd • Ethics and morals are traditionally treated as separate • Ethics are different intellectual framework and morality is patterns of practice • Ways of “seeing” and ways of doing are treated as separate • BUT … Ethics are always applied

  5. Ethical frameworks • Origins of ethics • The ethical question: how ought we live? • Normative ethics • Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, Deontology

  6. Normative frameworks • Virtue ethics (A. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics) • ‘Golden mean’ is a balance among all the virtues. • ‘arête (excellence or virtue) phronesis (practical or moral wisdom) and eudaimonia (usually translated as happiness or flourishing.)’ Hursthouse (2003). • Virtue do not inhere in a single good act, but is a way of being that is infused throughout a person. It is also called ‘character ethics’. • The dominant form of ethics throughout the West for many centuries. • What questions can we ask within this framework? • eg the un-virtuous character, defining virtue, rules …? • “Intelligence and courage”

  7. Normative frameworks • Deontology • Rule-based ethics. • Says we are duty bound to live according to rules, regardless of the consequences. • Kant’s categorical imperative is an updated deontology: • “Since by nature (according to Kant) the moral law is universal and impartial and rational, the categorical is a way of formulating the criteria by which any action can pass the test of universality, impartiality, and rationality. That is its only function” (Pecorino, 2002). • Kant is saying that any ethical principle must be applicable in a universal way, in all circumstances. • Deontology is opposed to consequentialism. • What are its weaknesses? What questions can we ask?

  8. Normative frameworks • Consequentialism • A part of utilitarian ethics. • The overarching principle is that the rightness of an act depends on its effects upon society. • The utilitarian bent is that the rightness of an act is assessed in terms of “the greatest good for the greatest many”. • The principle privileges the social over the individual. • What are the flaws? What questions can be asked. • http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/

  9. Metaethics • Study of where ethics arise from. • Moral philosophy, metaphysics of ethics • Relativism—individual, cultural, temporal (?) • ‘Objective vs realist’ perspectives • ‘Psychological issues’ • ‘Altruism vs egoism’ • ‘Male vs female morality’ • Fieser (2003). • Questions? Assumptions? Criticisms?

  10. Applied Ethics • According to some, that branch of ethics that is concerned with contentious issues, such as bioethics, cloning, abortion, human rights – in short, all the kinds of issues that inform new policies. • But all ethics are applied in a very real sense. • Therefore social practice is the most appropriate framework for applied ethics (Isaacs and Massey, 1994).

  11. Social Practice Ethics • An applied ethics that is based in social context, socialisation, and professional contexts. • It focuses on the human nature of engagement, and how engagements are shaped by ways of seeing, being, and acting that we acquire through our engagements. • It is fundamentally a communicative ethics that recognises persons are those who engage in social life, not, eg, institutions, philosophies, and so on, though these most certainly • It recognises power imbalances, social justice, and most importantly, that ethics are inseparable from all social interaction • The “ought” of social practice is oriented towards having sensibilities towards others as persons and being aware that what we do has direct effects on those persons. • In turn, this has a direct effect on the overall ethical character of the social systems we inhabit. • Communication plays an integral role, including media practices.

  12. Conclusion • Laws and codes are neither ethics nor morality • Ethics are an aspect of every human interaction • Ethics are always applied • The ethical is a dimension of human experience concerned with producing the good life. • It is incumbent upon each of us as individuals to be aware of our role in the constitution of the ethical dimension of social life.

  13. References • Aristotle, A. The Nicomachean Ethics. Penguin. • Hursthouse, R. (2003). "Virtue Ethics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/ethics-virtue/ • Pecorino, P. A. (2002). Ethical Traditions. http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/pecorip/SCCCWEB/ETEXTS/MEDICAL_ETHICS_TEXT/Chapter_2_Ethical_Traditions/Categorical_Imperative.htm • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2003). "Consequentialism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2003/entries/consequentialism/ • Fieser, J. (2003). Ethics. http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/ethics.htm

More Related