540 likes | 554 Vues
Explore the localization of cognitive functions in the nervous system and advancements in cortical neuroanatomy through sophisticated technology such as the Jülich–Düsseldorf atlas. Discover the evolution of concepts in the heteromodal association cortex and understand the importance of functional networks in cognitive processing.
E N D
Overview of cognitive systems Bradford C. Dickerson, M.D.Associate Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of NeurologyMassachusetts General HospitalMartinos Center for Biomedical Imagingbrad.dickerson@mgh.harvard.edu
Localization of function in the nervous system: Cytoarchitecture K. Brodmann, 1909
Cortical neuroanatomyConvergence of scales of analysis Investigators are using sophisticated technology to bring together cytoarchitectural and MRI-based topographic mapping: The Jülich–Düsseldorf atlas Eickhoff, Amunts, Zilles
Cortical neuroanatomyMonkey-human expansion Comparison of cortical surface area of humans vs. macaques showing areas of greatest expansion in orange-red Courtesy of David Van Essen
Cortical neuroanatomyPostnatal-to-adult expansion Comparison of cortical surface area of human infants vs. young adults showing areas of greatest expansion in yellow-orange Hill J et al., PNAS, 2010
Cortical neuroanatomyAge-related cortical atrophy Comparison of cortical thickness in older cognitively normal adults vs. young adults showing areas of greatest age-related cortical thinning in yellow-orange McGinnis & Dickerson, Brain Topography, 2013
Heteromodal association cortexEvolving concepts Von Bonin & Bailey (1940s/50s) Geschwind (1965) Pandya & Kuypers (1969) Jones & Powell (1970): The most obvious regions of convergence are in the depths of the superior temporal sulcus (probably the homologue of areas 39 and 40 in man), at the frontal pole, and in orbito-frontal cortex of the frontal operculum. Mesulam (1998): The unique role of these areas is to bind multiple unimodal and other transmodal areas into distributed but integrated multimodal representations. Transmodal areas in the midtemporal cortex, Wernicke’s area, the hippocampal– entorhinal complex and the posterior parietal cortex provide critical gateways for transforming perception into recognition, word-forms into meaning, scenes and events into experiences, and spatial locations into targets for exploration.
Heteromodal association cortex Mesulam, Principles, 1985
Cortical hubs: Areas with connectivity to many other areas Buckner et al., Neuron 2009
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Lesion studies of the language network:The major nodes Broca’s (production) Wernicke’s (comprehension)
Lesion studies of the language network:Disconnection syndromes Alexia without agraphia Geschwind N & Kaplan E, Neurology, 1962
Functional neuroimaging of the language network CJ Price, J Anat 2002
Large-scale Language Network fMRI task activation A B Resting state fcMRI C PPA atrophy
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Visual processing streams: Confirmation of hypotheses using neuroimaging Ungerleider LG, PNAS 1998
Visual object recognition: Lesion studies It is well known from studies of patients with lesions that visual agnosias may be specific to certain categories of information (e.g., faces – prosopagnosia; tools, etc)
Visual object recognition: Faces, places, etc Kanwisher N, Science, 2006
Visual object recognition: Faces In monkeys, fusiform face area was localized with fMRI; electrodes were placed in FFA Tsao D et al., Science, 2006
Visual object recognition: Faces Electrophysiologic data indicated that neurons in FFA were selectively (not specifically) activated to faces Tsao D et al., Science, 2006
Visual perception & imagery Generally similar activations with somewhat weaker activations in early visual cortices Ganis G, Cog Brain Res 2004
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Attention • Attention involves a “flexible interplay among intense concentration, inhibition of distractibility, and the ability to shift the center of awareness from one focus to another according to inner needs, past experience, and external reality. The object of attention is not always a sensory event in extrapersonal space but also can include trains of thought or even sequences of skilled movements.” • –Mesulam Ann Neurol 1981
Attentional network Mesulam M, 1981
fMRI detects attentional network Mesulam et al, 1999
Attention can modulate activity in other brain regions Mesulam MM, Phil Trans R Soc London, 1999
Visual processing: Attention influences which stream is used Visual stimuli were identical but subjects were asked to attend to different features Ungerleider LG, PNAS 1998
State vs “channel” functions Attention modulates the processing of specific sensorimotor, memory-related, or emotional features In addition to attention, states (of mind/brain and body) also exert a modulatory influence Sleep/arousal Needs (e.g., hunger) Mood “Channels” Unimodal sensorimotor systems States modulate function of “channel” systems
The limbic system directs heteromodal cortex toward relevant information LaBar KS, Behavioral Neuroscience 2001 Amygdala and insula, and also fusiform cortex, were more active when hungry individuals viewed food objects No such state-related effects were seen for tools
Localization of function in the nervous system: Functional networks • 5 major brain systems subserving cognition • Left perisylvian language network • Occipitotemporal network for object/face recognition • Medial temporal/limbic network for learning & memory • Parieto-frontal network for spatial attention • Prefrontal network for executive function & comportment From Mesulam MM, Brain, 1998
Insula, ACC, frontoparietal regions Nelson et al Brain Str Func 2010
Contemporary models of attention Top-down control Stimulus-driven control Corbetta, Patel & Shulman, Neuron, 2008
Contemporary models of attention Corbetta, Patel & Shulman, Neuron, 2008
Brain regions activated in response to pain Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK, 2005
Empathic pain perception: shared circuits Green: feeling your pain Red: watching your spouse feel pain Shared pain: areas representating the meaning of pain Your own pain: areas localizing pain Singer T et al., Science 2004
The “Salience” system Seeley WW et al., J Neurosci 2007
Testing attention • Verbal • Continuous performance task • Raise your finger every time I say the letter “A” • Sequencing/mental alternation • Letters/numbers • Months of year/days of week
Testing high-level visual abilities • Trail Making Test • A: Visual scanning, visuopsychomotor speed • B: Visual executive (alternating sequences) • Clock drawing, other drawing • Visual perceptual • Complex scenes • Overlapping figures • Letter cancellation, line bisection • Visual exploration in the office • Visually guided reaching • Oculomotor control
Clinical implications & testing • If warranted, consider going beyond MMSE & clock to include focused testing of domains described here • Attention • Visual perceptual skills • Drawing skills • Praxis (imitation & use) • Calculation • Writing, reading • Object recognition/naming
Patient J.H.male, age 61, right handed • J.H. is a former high school history teacher who stopped working at age 61 in part due to “problems remembering the lesson material.” In hindsight remembers first being concerned when the bell rang and he couldn’t figure out the time on the classroom clock. • He reports difficulty finding his way in his neighborhood, using machines at the gym. Has trouble losing objects in his house and sometimes not seeing them “when they’re right in front of me.” • He also has difficulty thinking through the steps of a problem and completing tasks.
Patient J.H.male, age 61, right handed Could draw simple shapes (square, circle), difficulty with intersecting pentagons, overlapping squares Line bisection marks were placed to the left of center. Omissions were more prominent on the left side of a letter cancellation task (19 left omissions, 13 right omissions). He could identify single letters, but was unable to identify any letters when they overlapped. When asked to verbally describe a narrative scene, he produced a good description of the right hand side of the page, but failed to attend to the elements on the left side of the page. Calculations were impaired (11+8 = 14, 17‐ 4 = 14; 8x7 = 54).
Mild global atrophy with enlarged ventricles Significant caudal parietal cortical thinning (R > L) Lesser bilateral hippocampal and associated medial temporal cortex atrophy Imaging Findings: Patient J.H.male, age 61, right handed
Brain anatomy Dorsal (superior) Caudal (posterior) Rostral (anterior) Ventral (inferior)