1 / 40

Introduction to PET/CT in Oncology: Practical Aspects

Introduction to PET/CT in Oncology: Practical Aspects. Jeffrey T. Yap, PhD Department of Imaging Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Outline. Image registration and fusion Visualization of PET and CT images Acquisition considerations Potential artifacts Considerations for Quantitative Imaging

kimo
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to PET/CT in Oncology: Practical Aspects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to PET/CT in Oncology:Practical Aspects Jeffrey T. Yap, PhD Department of Imaging Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

  2. Outline • Image registration and fusion • Visualization of PET and CT images • Acquisition considerations • Potential artifacts • Considerations for Quantitative Imaging • Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)

  3. CT PET Whole-body PET/CT protocol Patient prep 18FDG injection Uptake period Clinical Review ROI Definition SUV Analysis Spiral CT WB PET Fused PET/CT CT Topogram

  4. Definitions • Image registration: Process of matching the spatial coordinates between two or more images • Image fusion: Process of combining multiple images of a scene to obtain a single composite image

  5. Image registration: the problem

  6. Image registration: zoom

  7. Image registration: rotate

  8. Image registration: translate

  9. Image registration: complete

  10. 2D display methods 2 dimensional reconstructed planes: transaxial, sagittal, coronal, oblique Gray scale versus color tables Windowing (contrast enhancement) PET: linear scale specified by min & max CT: linear scale specified by center and width

  11. PET windowing:Bottom = 0, Top = 10

  12. PET windowing:Bottom = 2, Top = 10

  13. PET windowing:Bottom = 2, Top = 8

  14. CT windowing notation:Center = 5, Width = 10 W=10 C=5

  15. CT Windowing

  16. PET/CT Fusion Display = +

  17. 3D display methods Maximum intensity projection: Displays the maximum intensity along each projection Shaded surface: Displays lighted surface of segmented voxels Volume rendering: Displays multiple rendered objects with various transparencies and color tables

  18. Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP)

  19. 3D Display: Shaded Surface (SSD)

  20. 3D Display: Volume Rendering Technique

  21. Acquisition Considerations

  22. Options with CT Acquisition • Breathing protocols • Arms up for thorax/abdomen • Arms down for head/neck • Dose options: attenuation correction only, anatomical localization, full diagnostic • I.V. and/or oral contrast • Gated (cardiac or respiratory) • Dynamic (e.g. perfusion imaging)

  23. Options with PET acquisition Static Whole body (multiple bed positions) Step-and-shoot Continuous bed movement List-mode Dynamic Gated (cardiac and/or respiratory)

  24. Potential Artifacts

  25. CT-Based attenuation artifacts: respiratory motion

  26. Arms up Arms down PET image quality Arms down Arms up

  27. Intravenous contrast media

  28. CT PET PET/CT Chemotherapy port artifact

  29. PET CT Uncorrected PET Movement artifact

  30. Considerations for Quantitative Imaging Calibration of all instrumentation is required at commissioning and regular intervals (PET/CT scanners, dose calibrators, scales, clocks) Consistent patient preparation is critical (e.g. fasting) Technical acquisition should be standardized and critical parameters should be recorded

  31. Hardware/Software Requirements for Accurate SUV Quantification Dose calibrator accuracy – traceable standard Scanner normalization (detector efficiency) Scanner calibration PET corrections: attenuation, scatter, randoms, decay (images and doses) Partial volume correction for small objects Appropriate reconstruction algorithm Daily/weekly/monthly scanner QC

  32. Requirements for Reproducible SUV Quantification PET technique: 18FDG dose, 18FDG uptake period, emission scan length, scanning range, scanning direction (e.g. head to toe) Patient preparation: fasting, resting, medication Reconstruction parameters: slice thickness, filters Region-of-interest definition methods (mostly manual or semi-automated) Consistency is the most important factor!

  33. Mandatory measurements Acquisition parameters Patient height, weight Injected activity, residual, and time Circulating glucose Infiltrated doses Patient compliance (e.g. fasting state, movement) Protocol deviations Injection time/scan delays Injected activity

  34. Standardized Uptake Value SUV (time) = Radioactive Concentration x Weight Injected Activity • Under certain circumstances, 18FDG SUV correlates with metabolic rate of glucose and/or the number of viable tumor cells • Simplified semi-quantitative measure that can be routinely performed in clinical PET studies • Adjusts for differences in patient size and injected activity

  35. SUV Units • Assuming the following: • water-equivalent tissue • a body weight correction in grams • decay-correction to the time of injection • Concentration in consistent units of mCi/ml or MBq/cc • The SUV is a unit-less quantity • The SUV has a value of 1 if the radiotracer is uniformly distributed

  36. SUV Example • Consider 0.8 ml volume containing 12 mCi of 18FDG is “injected” into a 1.5 liter volume of water • SUV = Radioactive Conc. x Weight Injected Activity • SUV = (12 mCi / 1500 ml) * 1500 g (1 ml/g) 12 mCi SUV = 1

  37. Variations in SUV • Use of body surface area or lean body mass instead of weight • Sometimes denoted with subscripts (SUVBW, SUVBSA, SUVLBM) • Linear correction for circulating glucose • Designated uptake period – delayed scanning may reduce background physiologic uptake • Various statistics: mean, max, peak

  38. Mean = 2.09% Stdev = 2.29 Min = 0.00% Max = 41.4%

  39. The Good News • Most differences in scanner hardware and reconstruction software cancel out in longitudinal studies of the same patient • Although there is no universal cutoff, the SUV can help differentiate malignancy from normal tissue • Changes in SUV after therapy have been shown to correlate with clinical outcome (e.g. survival)

More Related