1 / 10

Resource Allocation in Pennsylvania

This document summarizes the outcomes of the Pennsylvania National Forum on Performance-Based Planning held on September 14, 2010. It provides insights into the financial guidance for bridge funding allocations, specifically addressing the resource allocation decision process. Key steps include developing quantitative and qualitative criteria, utilizing pairwise comparisons for weighting, and evaluating projects against established criteria. The focus is on prioritizing structurally deficient bridges and optimizing funding based on a cost-benefit analysis for effective use of state and federal resources.

kina
Télécharger la présentation

Resource Allocation in Pennsylvania

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resource Allocation in Pennsylvania National Forum on Performance Based Planning September 14, 2010

  2. Financial Guidance Work Group

  3. Bridge Funding Allocations (Federal and State) 80% square foot deck area of structurally deficient bridges, (% of total) 20% square foot deck area of all bridges, (% of total)

  4. Highway/Bridge Base Funding Allocations

  5. Resource Allocation Decision Process Overview – 5 steps

  6. Participants Develop Quantitative and Qualitative Decision Criteria

  7. Participants Use Pairwise Comparison to Develop Weights for Criteria

  8. Projects Are Evaluated Against Criteria, Resulting in a Prioritized List

  9. Resources Are Allocated to Projects Based on ‘Bang for the Buck’ Cost Benefit Analysis

More Related