1 / 18

The Rise of King Cotton

The Rise of King Cotton. Why did the institution of slavery command the loyalty of the vast majority of ante-bellum whites, despite the fact that only a small percentage of them owned slaves? (73)

kinsey
Télécharger la présentation

The Rise of King Cotton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Rise of King Cotton

  2. Why did the institution of slavery command the loyalty of the vast majority of ante-bellum whites, despite the fact that only a small percentage of them owned slaves? (73) • Slavery was the dominating reality of all southern life. Assess the validity of this generalization for TWO of the following aspects of southern life from about 1840 to 1860: political, social, economic, and intellectual life. (84)

  3. I. Slavery and the Southern Economy A. Saving Slavery • Slavery in economic decline in 1790s: coastal soil exhaustion, undependable foreign markets, rice no go inland, cotton bottled up • 2 dramatic changes: 1) Ind. Rev., 2) cotton gin • 1 slave, 1 day, 1 lbs. cotton • w/ cotton gin: 1:1:50 lbs • w/water power: 1:1:1,000 lbs

  4. B. Expanding the Empire • Expands into GA + Carolina piedmont (backcountry) • 1800: crosses mountains • VA becomes slave breeder selling excess pop. West (Miss., Alabama, LA, Ark.) • VA supports 1808 ban on slave trade for profits • 1792: 13,000 bales/yr; 1860: 5 million bales/yr • 12 wealthiest counties in US in South

  5. II. Moonlight and Magnolias? Free Southern Social Structure A. Myth and Reality • Myth of moonlight and magnolias: most whites on large plantations worked by 100s slaves live leisurely, civilized, honorable • Smiling house servants, cheerful field gangs

  6. Reality • 1860: only 25% own slaves at all • Of 25%: 1/2 owned ≤ 5; 75% ≤ 10 • From top: 1% slaveholders ≥ 100; 12% ≥ 20 • 20 key: min. required specialized plantation labor

  7. B. White Society 1) Planters (≥ 20 slaves) • Specialized ag. (cotton, tobacco, sugar) w/ extensive ÷ labor: field, house servants, pasture staff, artisans (plantation largely self-sufficient) • Genteel lifestyle: Extended visits, parties, balls; southern hospitality • “Wealthy” problematic: chronic debt • Capital tied up in land + slaves; borrow against crop

  8. 2) Small Slaveholders • Diff. to generalize: • Diff. geography: uplands (no/few aspirations greatness), delta + low country (ambitious, younger: led push into West)

  9. 3) Yeoman Farmers • Largest group (3/4 of whites in 1860) • Landowning (50-200 acres), no slaves (might hire during busy times cements relationship w/planters, part of southern paternalism), subsistence (esp. up country), few market transactions • Valued independence, folk culture (family, church, region)

  10. 4) “People of the Pine Barrens”: Landless Whites • Crackers (think “Deliverance”) • 10-20% of whites, no slaves, no land (squatters) • Not always primarily farmers (some corn, foraging, hunting) • Poor (20-40% South received aid from State); regarded as lazy, shiftless • Resisted hiring out to yeoman: comparison to slaves (Northern “wage slaves”) • Expansion of cotton kingdom harmed: closing off of public lands/fences impacts hunting and foraging

  11. C. Yeoman Political Demands • Although majority, little political power reapportion legislatures + expand voting rights more democratic than planters liked • Increasing tension: slaves more expensive (esp. post 1808) + less land West social mobility stifled But, remarkably little class conflict: • 1) diff. groups in diff. areas little interaction • 2) united by white supremacy + racism aspirations to planter status + slave ownership, despise slaves

  12. D. Free Blacks • Either descendents of slaves freed (1780s–90s) or runaways • Most landless, rural laborers • A few able to own land & slaves (usually wife & kids; not allowed to free them by law) • In LA & Gulf, mulattos from days of French and Spanish • Community centered on church (esp. African Methodist Episcopal) and faced ever-more restrictive southern laws • “One drop” rule constant fear of re-enslavement

  13. III. Planter Ethos: Culture of Honor • Value system: aristocratic, paternalistic (planters as fathers of society), stressed family (kin), social status, leisure, accomplishment, gentility, and honor • Honor: cluster of ethical rules; right behavior and worth based on others’ perceptions • Evaluated by: family bloodline (purity + position in clear hierarchy), physical characteristics (race, gender, physique, skill) • “Tweaking the nose”

  14. V. attuned to insults + physical courage duels (only acceptable response to insult) • Deep reverence of and fear for white women: women in command of bloodline (miscegenation) • Oath taking as male bond didn’t sign contracts (difficult to formalize business arrangements, banking, etc.)

  15. Anti-bourgeois: rejected profit; acquisitive but to reaffirm honor to be able to provide hospitality, own land + slaves (basis white male power) • Regard bourgeois North as effeminate, untrustworthy, dishonorable • Northern workers as “wage slaves”

  16. IV. The Habit of Command • Great irony: Owners completely dependent on slaves • Believed selves to be ferociously independent need to demonstrate command/control and superiority (of blacks and whites) • Theatrical demonstrations of slave submission

  17. Planters claimed paternalism limited cruelty, but: • 1) female slaves forced to work in fields (violates notions of femininity) • 2) nuclear families broken up (violates ideal of fatherly protection) • 3) severe punishments (in addition to fundamental cruelty of the system): slave breakers • Frederick Douglass and Mr. Covey

  18. Antebellum South marked by conflicting values: independence/dependence, gentility/violence • More dependent whites felt toward blacks more violent became

More Related