1 / 6

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data. 3 July 2013. What do the figures mean?. 1 point for emerging, 2 for expecting, 3 for exceeding 17 areas reported numerically Highest total points possible = 51 Lowest = 17 Mid point score = 34 Pilot 2012, the average point score was 32 points.

kisha
Télécharger la présentation

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data 3 July 2013

  2. What do the figures mean? • 1 point for emerging, 2 for expecting, 3 for exceeding • 17 areas reported numerically • Highest total points possible = 51 • Lowest = 17 • Mid point score = 34 • Pilot 2012, the average point score was 32 points

  3. A Good Level of Development (GLD) • Redefined from previous years • Expected (i.e. 2 points) for each of the 12 areas in PSED, Communication and Language, Physical development, Literacy and Maths • Unofficially it is thought that approx. 50% will get a GLD this year

  4. 2012 pilot data20,000 children in 500 schools across 19 Local Authorities Who achieved a Good Level of Development? • 41% of all children • 48% of girls, 34% of boys • 52% of autumn born children, 30% of summer born • 30% of children with EAL compared to 43% of children whose first language is English • 45% of non-FSM and 24% of FSM children • 44% of Chinese children, 29% of Black children • Scores lowest in writing and number • Scores highest in both areas of Physical Development • 2.4% of children scored the lowest possible total point score of 17 • 1% of children scored the highest possible total point score of 51

  5. Key messages • Reliability of this year’s data? • Cannot helpfully compare last year and this year’s GLD data • “Emerging” not a helpful term for year one teachers • Importance of transition - reception to year one • Importance of Prime areas • Importance of the Characteristics of Effective Learning • Literacy and Maths • Links between EYFSP and National Curriculum

More Related