1 / 31

Principles of Epidemiology

Principles of Epidemiology. Dona Schneider , PhD, MPH, FACE E J Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers University, NJ, USA. About the Author. Dona Schneider. Smoking Dietary factors Obesity Exercise Occupation Genetic susceptibility Infectious agents.

kmcneill
Télécharger la présentation

Principles of Epidemiology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principles of Epidemiology Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE E J Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers University, NJ, USA

  2. About the Author • Dona Schneider

  3. Smoking Dietary factors Obesity Exercise Occupation Genetic susceptibility Infectious agents Reproductive factors Socioeconomic status Environmental pollution Ultraviolet light Radiation Prescription Drugs Electromagnetic fields Known Risk Factors for Cancer

  4. Preliminary Topics • Data sources and limitations for cancer epidemiology • How much cancer is occurring? • How does occurrence vary within the population? • How do cancer rates in your area compare to that in other areas?

  5. Data sources and limitations for cancer epidemiology Review U.S. Census, U.S. Vital Statistics, SEER and NJCR data

  6. 1860 1870 1900 1970 20002 Race Categories in the Census 1860-2000 White White White White White Black Black Negro or Black Black of Negro decent Black, African American, or Negro Quadroon1 Quadroon Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Indian (Amer.) American Indian or Alaska Native Japanese Japanese Japanese Japanese Filipino Filipino Asian Indian Korean Korean Hawaiian Native Hawaiian Vietnamese Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Asian Other Pacific Islander Other Some other race

  7. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Revision of Statistical Policy Directive No. 15, Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting • Revised racial and ethnic standards (effective as of the 2000 decennial census) have 5 minimum categories for data on race and 2 for ethnicity • Other Federal programs should adopt standards no later than January 1, 2003

  8. OMB Race Categories • American Indian or Alaska Native A person having origins in any of the original people of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintain tribal affiliation or community attachment • Asian A person having origins in any of the original people of the Far East, Southeast Asia of the Indian subcontinent including for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and Vietnam

  9. OMB Race Categories(continued) • Black or African American A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Terms such as “Haitian” or “Negro” can be used in addition to “Black or African American” • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands • White Persons having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa

  10. Census Data • Changes to the Race Question in the 2000 Census: • The Asian and Pacific Islander (API) category was split: a) Asians b) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI) • The category American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut (AIEA) was changed to American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN) • Respondents could select more than one race.

  11. U.S. Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/

  12. Vital Statistics • Maintained by the National Center for Health Statistics (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss.htm) • States report the following to NCHS: • Birth data (Natality) • Death data (Mortality) • Marriage data (no longer collected) • Divorce data (no longer collected)

  13. CDC Wonder http://wonder.cdc.gov/

  14. Registries for Morbidity Data • New Jersey Cancer Registry http://www.state.nj.us/health/cancer/statistics.htm • SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results http://seer.cancer.gov/

  15. Data Limitations • Little data is available at the local level • Problem of small numbers • Data may not be collected uniformly (race category differences, etc.) • People are mobile • Cancer has a long lag time

  16. How much cancer is occurring? Understand incidence rates and prevalence

  17. Measuring Epidemiological Outcomes Relationship between any two numbers (e.g. males / females) Ratio A ratio where the numerator is included in the denominator (e.g. males / total births) Proportion A proportion with the specification of time (e.g. deaths in 2000 / population in 2000) Rate

  18. Definitions • Incidence is the rate of new cases of a disease or condition in a population at risk during a time period • Prevalence is the proportion of the population affected

  19. Incidence • Incidence is a rate • Calculated for a given time period (time interval) • Reflects risk of disease or condition Number of new cases during a time period Incidence = Population at risk during that time period

  20. Prevalence • Prevalence is a proportion • Point Prevalence: at a particular instant in time • Period Prevalence: during a particular interval of time (existing cases + new cases) Number of existing cases Prevalence = Total number in the population at risk

  21. Prevalence = Incidence  Duration Prevalence depends on the rate of occurrence (incidence) AND the duration or persistence of the disease At any point in time: • More new cases (increased risk) yields more existing cases • Slow recovery or slow progression increases the number of affected individuals

  22. Incidence/Prevalence Example For male residents of Connecticut: • The incidence rate for all cancers in 1982 • 431.9 per 100,000 per year • The prevalenceof all cancers on January 1, 1982 • 1,789 per 100,000 (or 1.8%)

  23. Proportional cancer incidence by gender, US 2000

  24. How does occurrence vary within the population? Understand measures of association and difference

  25. Outcome Measures • Compare the incidence of disease among people who have some characteristic with those who do not • The ratio of the incidence rate in one group to that in another is called a rate ratio or relative risk (RR) • The differencein incidence rates between the groups is called a risk difference or attributable risk (AR)

  26. Calculating Outcome Measures Outcome No Disease (controls) Exposure Disease (cases) Incidence IE = A / (A+B) Exposed A B IN = C / (C+D) Not Exposed C D Relative Risk = IE / IN Attributable Risk = IE - IN

  27. Lung Cancer Exposure Yes No Total Incidence Smoker 70 300 370 70/370 = 189 per 1000 30/730 = 41 per 1000 Non-smoker 30 700 730 100 1,100 1,000 Relative Risk = IE / IN = 189 / 41 = 4.61 Attributable Risk = IE - IN = 189 - 41 = 148 per 1000

  28. Relative Risk = IE / IN = 189 / 41 = 4.61 • Smokers are 4.61 times more likely than nonsmokers to develop lung cancer • 148 per 1000 smokers developed lung cancer because they smoked Attributable Risk = IE - IN = 189 - 41 = 148 per 1000

  29. Annual Death Rates for Lung Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease by Smoking Status, Males Annual Death Rate / 100,000 Coronary Heart Disease Exposure Lung Cancer Smoker 127.2 1,000 Non-smoker 12.8 500 RR 127.2 / 12.8 = 9.9 1000 / 500 = 2 AR 127.2 – 12.8 = 114.4 per 100,000 1000 – 500 = 500 per 100,000

  30. Summary • The risk associated with smoking is lower for CHD (RR=2) than for lung cancer (RR=9.9) • Attributable risk for CHD (AR=500) is much higher than for lung cancer (AR=114.4) • In conclusion: CHD is much more common (higher incidence) in the population, thus the actual number of lives saved (or death averted) would be greater for CHD than for lung cancer

More Related