1 / 22

Progress in the development of lens-coupled LEKIDs

Progress in the development of lens-coupled LEKIDs. Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA): I. Lorite , M. Parra, E. Alvarez, and J. Bueno Universidad Complutense de Madrid: B. Blazquez , N. Llombart Instituto de Microelectrónica de Madrid (CSIC): J. L. Costa- Krämer

knox
Télécharger la présentation

Progress in the development of lens-coupled LEKIDs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Progress in the development of lens-coupled LEKIDs Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA): I. Lorite, M. Parra, E. Alvarez, and J. Bueno Universidad Complutense de Madrid: B. Blazquez, N. Llombart Instituto de Microelectrónica de Madrid (CSIC): J. L. Costa-Krämer Many thanks to the Cardiff University group

  2. Outline 1.- Lens-coupledLEKIDs • 2.- Electromagneticsimulations • - Absortionefficiency • - Resonatordesign • 3.- Microfabricatedsiliconlenses • - A simple idea • - Fabrication • Surfacecharacterization • - Beampatternmeasurements • 4.- TitaniumNitride • - Sputteringchamber • - Growth • X-raydiffraction • Ramanspectroscopy • - Hall effect 5.- Conclusions & futurework

  3. Lens coupledLEKIDs: concept • Siliconlensfocusestheradiationontotheinductivepart of the detector • Reduces crosscouplingsincethespacingbetweenthepixelsislarger • Increasesthesamplingefficiencybecausetheradiationisfocusedintotheinductivepart • Disadvantage: • more complicated 3D structure

  4. Electromagneticsimulations:absorptionefficiency (I) • Analyticalmodel • Full-wave simulations (CST) • Efficienciesover 90% in a broad band (from 0.5 to 2.2THz) assumingthatthegrid has aninfinitearea

  5. Electromagneticsimulations:absorptionefficiency (II) • ThelensfocuseswithanAirypattern • Thespilloverdependsonhowmanyfringes of theAirypattern are onthe LEKID • The total efficiencyisover 80% for a broad band from 0.5 to 2.2THz

  6. Electromagneticsimulations:the detector • LEKID isdesignedwith a circular shapeformsamplingthefirsttwofringes of theAirypattern • A 5x5 pixel arrayfor 1.4THz has beendesigned

  7. Micromachined Si lenses: ‘simple’ idea • Deposit a photoresistdroponto a siliconwafer • Transfer theshape of a resistdropintothesiliconwaferby Reactive Ion Etching • Thesiliconlensismade

  8. Micromachined Si lenses:fabrication • Transfer a drop of photoresistintothesiliconbymeans of RIE • Theheigth and width of thedrop can becontrolledwiththedensity of thephotoresist • Currentlydeveloping a methodusinglithographictechniqueswithgoodpreliminaryresults

  9. Micromachined Si lenses:surfacecharacterization (I) • SEM imagestaken • Pittingobservedduetosolventmicrobubbles in thephotoresist • Surfaceroughness of 3mm

  10. Micromachined Si lenses:surfacecharacterization (II) • AFM imagestaken • Porous are 500nm deep • Theareawith no porous has a surfaceroughness of about 100nm

  11. Micromachined Si lenses:surfacecharacterization (II) • Picture of a lenscompletelyetched • Lenseswith a diameterbetween 1.5 – 4.5 mm havebeenfabricated • Theheigth of thelensesvariesfrom 50 to 350 mm

  12. Micromachined Si lenses:beampatternmeasurements (I) • Beam spot at the focus plane of the lens measured using a multiangle knife-edge method • A CO2 laser at 10.6mm wavelegth has been used • 1D are traced to get a 2D image of the beam pattern of the lens at the focal plane

  13. Micromachined Si lenses: beampatternmeasurements (II) • Beampatternmeasured at differentdistancestofind focal plane • Thebeam spot at the focal plane has a diameter of 200mm

  14. TitaniumNitride:sputteringchamber • Home-madesystem, dedicatedchamberfor • TiNgrowth • Load-locksystemforsubstrate transfer • Base pressurebelow 5x10-9 mbar • 2” Ti target

  15. TitaniumNitride: growth Power: 200W Thickness: 40-125nm Power: 200W Thickness: 40-80nm Power: 200W Thickness: 225nm Power: 200-300W Thickness: 25-125nm New target • Resistivity of 30mW cm for N2concentrationsbetween 5 and 25% • ResistivityevenlowerthantheAluminiumonefor N2concentrationsabove 75%

  16. TitaniumNitride:x-raydifractionmeasurements • Differentlatticestructuredependingonthethickness • Transitionoccursbetween 125 and 225nm • Top graphisconsistentwithVisserset al.paper Tc=1K Tc=3.3K

  17. TitaniumNitride:Ramanspectroscopymeasurements • Superconductingsamples • Non-superconductingsamples • Disorderseemstohelpthesuperconductivity

  18. TitaniumNitride: Hall effectmeasurements • Two films at 15% N2concentration • Resistivity comparable withtheonemeasuredpreviously • Leftplotissuperconducting and rightplotdoesnotsuperconduct • Leftplot: ‘p’ carriers; rightplot: ‘n’ carriers • Number of carriers in theorder of 1023

  19. Conclusions • 1.- Electromagneticsimulations • Absortionefficienciesover 80% over a broad band • A 5x5 pixel arrayreadytobefabricated • 2.- Microfabricated Si lenses • A fairlyinexpensivemethodforlensfabricationwithstandardcleanroomtechniques has beendeveloped • Thelenssurface has a roughness of 3mm, goodenoughforanysubmmapplication • - Thebeampattern has beenmeasuredshowingthatfocuses light • 3.- Titaniumnitride • We are abletogrowsuperconductingTiNwithtunable Tc (0.5 - 4K) and r = 30mW cm • Thelatticechangesdependingonthethickness of thedepositedTiN (somewherebetween 125 and 225nm) • The more disorderedthe film is, thebetter superconductor itbecomes (?) • Differentcarriertypescouldbe a superconductivity trace (?)

  20. Workto do beforethenext KISS workshop 1.- Fabricatethe 5x5 pixel array (nextweek) and measureitwith and withoutlenses 2.- Continuetodevelop a methodforfabrication of biglensarrays 3.- ContinuetheTiNcharacterizationtoobtain a roomtemperaturediagnostictoolthatallowstoknowwhetherthe film issuperconductingbeforecoolingitdown

  21. Introducing Mar Bueno-Llombart

  22. Anyquestions? Ask my daddy a difficultquestion… . ifyoudare!!!

More Related