1 / 31

Scalable Distributed Database System: SD-SQL Server

Scalable Distributed Database System: SD-SQL Server. Soror SAHRI Ceria, Paris-Dauphine University Soror.Sahri@Dauphine.fr Journées Académiques Microsoft Paris, April 2006. Overview. Objective SD-SQL Server Architecture Application Interface Implementation Performance Analysis

korene
Télécharger la présentation

Scalable Distributed Database System: SD-SQL Server

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Scalable Distributed Database System: SD-SQL Server Soror SAHRI Ceria, Paris-Dauphine University Soror.Sahri@Dauphine.fr Journées Académiques Microsoft Paris, April 2006

  2. Overview • Objective • SD-SQL Server Architecture • Application Interface • Implementation • Performance Analysis • Conclusion

  3. Objective • Most of DBSs have distributed/parallel versions • SQL Server, Oracle, DB2… • DBSs do not provide dynamic partitioning of relational tables • All require manual (distributed) repartitioning when tables scale-up

  4. Objective • http://ceria.dauphine.fr/CERIA-publications.html • Research Report, December 2005 • [Oracle Database 10g]

  5. Objective • Scalable DistributedPartitioning of Relational Tables • Scalable Distributed Database System (SD-DBS) • Litwin, Rich & Schwartz • “Architecture for a scalable Distributed DBSs” • 2nd Intl. Workshop on Cooperative Internet Computing, 2002

  6. SD-SQL Server • SD-SQL Server is the first prototype SD-DBS • Generalizes SQL Server • Shared Nothing Architecture • Embeds SQL Server 2000 (at present) • Up to 250 nodes (at present)

  7. User/Application User/Application sd_insert sd_create_table SD-SQL ServerManagers SD-SQLserver SD-SQLpeer SD-SQLclient SD-SQLserver LinkedSQLServers T Split _D1_T _D1_T _D1_T NDBs C P S S D2 Di Di+1 D1 SD-SQL Server Architecture D1_T

  8. …… Node1 Node2 Node3 Nodei DB1 DB2 DB1 DB2 DB1 DB2 SDB DB1SDB MDB Nodes, NDBs and SDBs

  9. NDB Types • An SD-SQL Server NDB can be: • Client NDB • Carries only images • Application interfaces • Server NDB • Carries only the segments • Primary NDB • First created for an SDB • Peer NDB • Both functions

  10. Scalable Tables • A scalable (distributed) table is a collectionof segments • Segments are SQL tables • A scalable table has, initially, only one primary segment • At some server or peer NDB • The number of segments in a scalable table is variable • Overflowing segments split

  11. Splitting • A split occurs when an insert overflows the segmentcapacity • Splits produce other segments for a scalable table. • Each is located at a different NDB • Within the SDB • If there is not enough NDBs, splits dynamically append new ones

  12. N1 N2 N3 Ni N3 sd_create_node_database N4 NDBDB1 NDBDB1 NDBDB1 NDBDB1 NDBDB1 NDBDB1 SDB DB1 SDB DB1 SDB DB1 sd_insert sd_insert sd_insert ScalableTable T Splitting sd_create_node sd_create_node_database …….

  13. p=INT(b/2) C( S)= { c: c < h = c (b+1-p)} C( S1)={c: c > = c (b+1-p)} b+1-p p S S S1 Splitting Check Constraint? b+1 b SELECT TOP Pi * INTO Ni.Si FROM S ORDER BY C ASC SELECT TOP Pi * WITH TIES INTO Ni.S1 FROM S ORDER BY C ASC

  14. Images • Images hide the scalable table segments • An image is a distributed updateable partitioned view of a scalable table • Union-all view with check constraints • An image presents the scalable table partitioning • It do not address any new segments resulted from a split

  15. Images • Primary image • Resides at the creation node • Has the name of the scalable table • Secondary images • Reside at other client or peer NDBs of the SDB • Have a specific name, other than that of the table • To avoid name conflict • Scalable Views • Carry images at several levels

  16. DB1 SDB N1.DB1 N2.DB1 N3.DB1 Primary Image Images T Scalable Table CREATE VIEW TAS SELECT * FROM N1.DB1._Ni_T CREATE VIEW TAS SELECT * FROM N1.DB1._Ni_T UNION ALL SELECT * FROM N2.DB1._Ni_T UNION ALL SELECT * FROM N3.DB1._Ni_T

  17. Application Interface • Applications manipulate SD-SQL Server through its command interface. • SD-SQL Server commandsstart with ‘sd_’ • To distinguish from SQL Server commands for static tables. INSERT sd_insert CREATE TABLEsd_create_table

  18. Application Interface:The SkyServer Benchmark • Use of the SkyServer DB as benchmark • http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/SDSS • Use of thePhotoObj table as a scalable table. • PhotoObjhas 158,426 tuples (about 260 MB)

  19. Application Interface: Node Management • Node Creation • sd_create_node ‘Dell1’/* Serverby default */ • sd_create_node ‘Ceria’, ‘client’ • Node Alteration • sd_alter_node ‘Ceria’, ‘ADD server’ /* Becomes peer*/ • Node Removal • sd_drop_node ‘Ceria’

  20. Application Interface: NDBs &SDBs Management • SDB Creation • sd_create_scalable_database ‘SkyServer’, ‘Dell1’, ‘Server’,2 /* Creates the primary SkyServer NDB as well at Dell1*/ • NDB Creation • sd_create_node_database‘SkyServer’, ‘Ceria’, ‘Client’ • SDB Removal • sd_drop_scalable_database‘SkyServer’

  21. Application Interface: Scalable Tables Management • Scalable Table Creation • sd_create_table ‘PhotoObj (objid BIGINT PRIMARY KEY…)’, 10000 • Scalable Table Alteration • sd_alter_table‘PhotoObj ADD t INT’, 1000 • sd_create_index‘run_index ON Photoobj (run)’ • sd_drop_index‘PhotoObj.run_index’ • Scalable Table Removal • sd_drop_table‘PhotoObj’

  22. Application Interface: Scalable Tables Management • Insert • sd_insert‘INTO PhotoObj SELECT * FROM Ceria5.Skyserver-S.PhotoObj’ • Search • sd_select‘* FROM PhotoObj’ • sd_select‘TOP 5000 * INTO PhotoObj1 FROM PhotoObj’, 500

  23. Application Interface • See “Architecture and Interface of Scalable Distributed Database System SD-SQL Server”,IASTED-DBA 2006

  24. Implementation • Commands are distributed stored procedures • Processed as distributed transactions at Repeatable Read isolation level • See • “ Prototyping a Scalable Distributed Database System SD-SQL Server”, WDAS 2006

  25. Performance Analysis (1) (Q1)sd_select‘COUNT (*) FROM PhotoObj’ Query (Q1) execution time

  26. Performance Analysis (2) (Q2)sd_select‘TOP 10000 x.objid FROM photoobj x, photoobj y WHERE x.obj=y.obj AND x.objid>y.objid’ Query (Q2) with image checking only (IC) and with image adjustment (IA)

  27. Performance Analysis (3) • sd_select‘COUNT (*) FROM PhotoObj’ Comparison between SD-SQL Server and SQL Server

  28. Conclusion • Scalable distributed partitioning of relational tables is now reality with SD-SQL Server • No manual repartitioning • Unlike in any other DBS we know about • Performance analysis proves • Efficiency of our design • Immediate utility of SD-SQL Server

  29. Future Works • Management of replication, data failures.. • Non-availability of a server…. • Management of the data merging • Application on other DBMSs • Oracle, DB2….

  30. Work partly supported by • CEE Project EGov • MS Research • CEE Project ICONS • IBM Almaden Res. Cntr., CA • HP Laboratories, CA

  31. Thank YouQuestions? Soror SAHRI Ceria, Paris-Dauphine University Soror.Sahri@Dauphine.fr Journées Académiques Microsoft Paris, April 2006

More Related