240 likes | 493 Vues
Growth Indicators for Infants and Toddlers. Charles R. Greenwood, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas DEC, Boston, December, 2001. Rationale. Assessment that early interventionists can use: To identify early To monitor growth and progress
E N D
Growth Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Charles R. Greenwood, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas DEC, Boston, December, 2001
Rationale • Assessment that early interventionists can use: • To identify early • To monitor growth and progress • To make intervention decisions
Unique Features • Appropriate for infants/toddlers • Economical to employ • Efficient to learn to use • Repeatable • Directly represents rate of growth • Sensitive to age and interventions
Completed or Nearly Completed • Expressive Communication • Luze et al., School Psychology Review, 2001, 30(3), 383-406. • Greenwood et al., Best Practices in School Psychology (Vol. IV), in press, NASP • Social Interaction • In preparation
Infant/Toddler Expressive Communication General Outcome: The child uses gestures, sounds, words, or sentences to convey wants and needs or to express meaning to others. Constructs: Prelinguistic Linguistic Communication Communication Key Skill: Single Multiple Elements: Gestures Vocalizations Words Words Time to Bench Mark: 0-------6-------12-------18-------24-------30-------36 Months of Age
Infant/Toddler GOM Summary • Expressive Communication • Social Interaction • Movement • Problem Solving • Self Help
Today’s Topics • Movement (Gross Motor) • Problem Solving (Cognitive)
Infant/Toddler Movement General Outcome: The child moves in a fluent and coordinated manner to play and participate in home, school, and community settings. Constructs: Transitional Object Movements Locomotion Control Key Skill: Change in Roll/ Trap/ Elements: Position Grounded Vertical Throw Catch Time to Bench Mark: 0-------6-------12-------18-------24-------30-------36------ Months of Age
Movement Sample • 39 Children: • Gender • 17 (43.6%) male • 22 (56.4%) female • Race • 33 African American (84.6%) • 2 Hispanic/Latino (5.1%) • 2 mixed races (5.1%) • 2 European-American (5.1%) • Disability • 5 with IFSP’s • 2 Child care centers serving teen moms
Study Design • Nine repeated GOM measurements • (each 3 weeks apart) • Criterion Tests (Beginning & Ending) • Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2 • Caregiver Movement Report (Researcher Developed) • GOM growth curve modeling (Bryk & Raudenbusch, 1992)
GOM Movement Assessment Protocol • Common Toy Set: Testing Play-Like But Standarized Situations • Assessor's Behavior • Observational Recording Form
Sensitivity to Growth Key Skill Elements
Sensitivity to Growth Total Movement Rate = (Change in Position + Grounded + Vertical Locomotion + Roll & Throw + Trap & Catch)/Time Observed) • Growth by Age Cohort • 0-12, intercept = 5.26, slope = 0.65 • 13-24, intercept = 9.95, slope = 0.35 • 25-36+, intercept = 14.65, slope = 0.05
Rate of Growth Across 9 Measurement Occasions for Three Age Cohorts (Each Occasion = 3 Weeks)
25.0 20.0 15.0 Total Movement Rate 10.0 Curve 5.0 0.0 4.00 6.00 8.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 40.00 42.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 36.00 38.00 -5.0 Age at Measurement Total Movement Rate Growth Curve Over Age at Measurement
Children with IFSP’s Child with hydrocephaly
Technical Features • GOM Odd/Even Reliability Correlations • r = 0.88 • M = 8.8 odd vs. M = 8.2 even movements/minute • GOM Alternate Toy Forms Reliability • r = 0.85 (BB versus WH) • r = 0.84 (WH versus SC) • r = 0.91 (BB versus SC) • Note: BB=Blocks & balls, WH = Window house, SC = Shopping carat
Technical Features (Contin.) • GOM Criterion Validity Correlations • Total Movement Rate vs. • Peabody Locomotion Sub-Scale • r (Mean Level [intercept]) = 0.903 • r (Mean Slope [growth rate]) = -0.289 • Parent/Caregiver Report Total Score • r (Mean Level [intercept]) = 0.851 • r (Mean Slope [growth rate]) = -0.177
Summary/Implications • Infant/Toddler Movement GOM • Considerable Progress • Reliable • Valid • Sensitive to Age • Limitations/Future Research • Single, small sample • 25-36+ age children at benchmark • Treatment validity yet to be investigated
Infant/Toddler Problem Solving (Cognitive) General Outcome: Child solves problems that require reasoning about objects, concepts, situations, and people. Construct: Visual Object Problem Exploration Exploration Solving Key Skill Looking Touch/Mouth/Manip. Toy Performs Persistence/ Elements: Its Function Sustained/ Attention Time to Bench Mark: 0-------6--------12--------18--------24--------30--------36 Months of Age
Standard Toy Set Shopping Cart Window House Blocks/Balls
Assessor's Behavior • Clean Room/Set up toys-situation • Engage child in active play/movement