1 / 17

Public Relations & Professional Ethics

Public Relations & Professional Ethics. 31 July 2015. Johanna Fawkes. Senior Lecturer in Public Relations at Charles Sturt University Devised and delivered some of the first PR degree and professional courses at three UK universities

kvaughn
Télécharger la présentation

Public Relations & Professional Ethics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Relations & Professional Ethics 31 July 2015

  2. Johanna Fawkes • Senior Lecturer in Public Relations at Charles Sturt University • Devised and delivered some of the first PR degree and professional courses at three UK universities • Written papers for international journals and contributed chapters to leading PR text books • Author of Public Relations, Ethics and Professionalism: The Shadow of Excellence. PR & Professional Ethics

  3. Bad barrels: public relations & professional ethics Johanna Fawkes, PhD MCIPR

  4. Overview: • PR Ethics – summary of problems • A Jungian approach • Applied to PR ethics • Issues for the profession • Q & A

  5. Questions of professionalism • Claim to professional status rests on expertise, national body, social value and ethical standards (Cooper, 2004) • Changing 21C status of professions, given technological, knowledge & societal shifts, inc.managerialism • Emerging professions’ need for recognition & autonomy; crisis of trust/threat of regulation

  6. PR approaches to ethics • Core texts & professional codes stress duty and/or consequences using limited sources of ethical theory • Can be seen in claim that PR acts as ‘ethical guardian’ & contributes to democracy • Critics reject such ideals; accuse PR of propaganda • AND many practitioners prefer the ‘taxi/lawyer’ model – no social claims

  7. Jungian psyche • Persona = Public face • Over ID with Persona leads to delusion • Shadow = rejected, neglected aspects • leads to denial & blame (the Other); later = mid-life crisis • Jungian ethics constructed from process of individuation • Elements (of individual or group) are fragments of whole – task is to create dialogue between elements • Challenges ideals, aims for maturity

  8. Jungian ethics Ethics emerges from self-acceptance, leading to other-acceptance Persona/Shadow is not about good/bad; Integration = wholeness Conscience triggered in process = ethical attitude = integrity (Solomon, 2001; Beebe, 1992) Integrity emerges through dialogue – with self and others

  9. Applying Jungian psychology Jungian ideas applied to organisations – now to professions Persona/Shadow split can be seen in idealised professional codes vs Bad Apples (or Bad Barrels? Zimbardo, 2007) In PR, Excellence = persona; critics = shadow (Fawkes, 2014) PR split into ethical ‘guardians’ vs advocates, or Saints & Sinners (Bowen, 2008; Baker, 2008, Fawkes, 2012) Ethical conflict can cause distress in PR practitioners (Kang, 2010 ) Individuation is triggered by mid-life crisis; is PR facing one too?

  10. Jungian toolkit – ID Persona What words/symbols/images, does the profession use to promote itself? What stories do we tell? Hero or victim? Who are we? Who is missing? How do we see our role? Ethical guardians, service providers, lawyers? How do we see our role in society? Upholding or undermining democracy?

  11. Jungian toolkit - ID Shadow Who do we hate/distance ourselves from? How well do we manage mistakes? How fallible can we be? Who do we blame? Board/bad apples/publics? What do we deny? Who can’t we hear? What topics are taboo? How do we deal with criticism? How badly does it hurt us? How are we perceived by others? Who teaches what to next generation? Who can we ask, where do we look, for guidance?

  12. Implications for profession Embrace multiplicity of roles, identities Allow for imperfection, moving away from idealised codes Create space for dialogue around ethics – including mistakes A different kind of communication - based on reflection

  13. Implications for practitioners Acknowledge messy, everyday ethics Admit mistakes (to self if not others) Monitor & respect discomfort Encourage debate, delay, reflection

  14. Conclusions Ethics without reflection are empty Professions like PR need stronger tools for inventory Workplaces and individuals can also use toolkit to generate self-awareness Jungian ethics provide questions, not answers Doubt, self-doubt and ‘delay’ are essential to ethical practice = “Are we sure?”

  15. Bibliography • Baker, S. (2008). The Model of The Principled Advocate and The Pathological Partisan: A Virtue Ethics Construct of Opposing Archetypes of Public Relations and Advertising Practitioners. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 23(3), 235-253. • Bowen, S. A. (2008). A State of Neglect: Public Relations as 'Corporate Conscience' or Ethics Counsel. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(3), 271-296. doi: 10.1080/10627260801962749 • Cooper, D. E. (2004). Ethics for professionals in a multicultural world. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. • Corlett, J. G., & Pearson, C. (2003). Mapping the organizational psyche : a Jungian theory of organizational dynamics and change. Gainesville, Fla.: Center for Applications of Psychological Type. • Fawkes, J. (2012). Saints and sinners: Competing identities in public relations ethics. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 865-872 • Fawkes, J. (2014). Public relations ethics and professionalism : the shadow of excellence, London & New York: Routledge • Fawkes, J. (2015) A Jungian conscience: self-awareness for public relations practice, Public Relations Review, online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.005 • Kang, J.-A. (2010). Ethical conflict and job satisfaction of public relations practitioners. Public Relations Review, 36, 152-156. • Ketola, T. (2010). Responsible leadership: building blocks of individual, organisational and societal behaviour. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 173-184.

  16. Next PRIA Webinar Five awkward questions about the future of public relations Catherine Arrow 12:00 pm AEST, 14 August 2015 PR & Professional Ethics

  17. Feedback Please stay online for a minute to give us your feedback online. Thank you and see you next month!

More Related