1 / 6

2014 Canadian Consortium

2014 Canadian Consortium. Jacksonville, Florida. Agenda 10:00am Welcome and Introductions 11:00am BREAK 11:15am Parking Lot 12:00pm Lunch 1:00pm Issues and Concerns 2:30pm BREAK 3:30pm Next Steps 4:00pm Closing Comments. ISSUES and TOPICS.

kyla-price
Télécharger la présentation

2014 Canadian Consortium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2014 Canadian Consortium Jacksonville, Florida

  2. Agenda 10:00am Welcome and Introductions 11:00am BREAK 11:15am Parking Lot 12:00pm Lunch 1:00pm Issues and Concerns 2:30pm BREAK 3:30pm Next Steps 4:00pm Closing Comments

  3. ISSUES and TOPICS • Strategies for deterring and dealing with purchased work. We all know it is happening, and that this is real cheating, but seem fairly powerless to do anything about it. • Strategies for dealing with possession electronic devices in exams. What works? Sanctions? • Policies around editing. • ELL issues • What, if anything, can we do to try and put the teaching of basic research/writing skills back into the hands of high schools?

  4. ISSUES and TOPICS • How to assess/evaluate the effectiveness of their educational programming. • How to evaluate our services and measure whether or not programming is achieving the intended goals/mandates. • Challenges: with this- people-resources required to • Development and administration of assessment tools. • Collect/analyze data; practicalities of collecting ‘data’ from students who participate in our programming. • What would assessment tools look like?

  5. ISSUES and TOPICS • Is anyone using a “discipline matrix”? • Statistics reporting: Do you report? What is reported (total cases; just appeal cases)? Is this public? • Tracking work flow: Do you track the things that you do (e.g. presentations, consultations, etc)? • Who sees this data? • How is this data used to inform us about how we do our work? • How is this data used to inform the University community?

  6. Thank you Amanda McKenzie, Jo Hincliffe and Troy Brooks See you in 2015

More Related