1 / 16

NATO/ PfP Simulation Study

NATO/ PfP Simulation Study. The NMSG study for the MC on the cost effective implementation of Simulation to enhance PfP interoperability with NATO. Graham Burrows, Head MSCO Cdr Gregorio Ameyugo, Deputy Head MSCO. CIVIL AND MILITARY ORGANISATION OF NATO. North Atlantic Council. Civil.

kyle
Télécharger la présentation

NATO/ PfP Simulation Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATO/ PfP Simulation Study The NMSG study for the MC on the cost effective implementation of Simulation to enhance PfP interoperability with NATO Graham Burrows, Head MSCO Cdr Gregorio Ameyugo, Deputy Head MSCO

  2. CIVIL AND MILITARY ORGANISATION OF NATO North Atlantic Council Civil Military MILITARY COMMITTEE NATO Civilian Organisation Research & Technology Organisation NATO Military Organisation MAIN ARMAMENT GROUPS NIAG INDUSTRY

  3. Human Factors & Medicine Panel Sensors & Electronics Technology Panel Modelling & Simulation Group Information Systems Technology Panel Systems Concepts & Integration Panel Studies Analysis & Simulation Panel The RTO Organisation NATO national technician and scientific experts organised in: Applied Vehicle Technology Panel

  4. The RTO Network • Research and Technology Board (57) (HIGH LEVEL NATIONAL REPS) • RTA Headquarters (49+5) (Permanent Staff in Paris) • Panel Members (373) (NATIONAL REPS) • Participants - (est. 3000 working in RTO activities)

  5. The NATO/ PfP Simulation Study

  6. WE ARE CREATING A COMMON SPACE

  7. NATO is Aware of and Active in the Use of Information Technology to Improve Interoperability through the TEEP Programme

  8. DESIRED END STATE GOAL A structured, persistent, and readily accessible NATO sponsored Individual and Collective Exercise and Education Programme aiming to enhance Partner Nations interoperability with NATO.

  9. MC TASKING TO MSCO • NATO should assist Partners in their training to enhance their capability to participate in NATO led operations • NATO Training Group (assisted by NMSG)to derive PfP • specific requirements • M&S Coordination Office: • To explore and report on the cost effective implementation of distributed training for PfP • Investigate and recommend effective links between TEEP PfP / ISO PfP initiatives and NATO

  10. TOOLS TO IMPROVE INTEROPERABILITY SACLANT Focal Point for both activities Better NATO PfP Interoperability ADL Prototype Prototype Exercises ADL Programme Advanced Distributed Learning Training & Exercise Programme Computer Simulations NATO Defence College NATO School (SHAPE) PfP Consortium NATO School (SHAPE) NC3A PfP Training Centre ACSTP Programme

  11. WAY TO THE DESIRED END STATE Training, Coop & Education Players End State Infrastructure Enhanced NATO/ PfP Inter- Operability ADL (Prototype & CP) ACSTP (CP) PfP SIMNET Non-Permanent Networks (commercially leased) NATO IMS SHAPE SACLANT NATO NATIONS NDC NS(S) Implementation with SACLANT as primary POC PfP/ ISO PfP PCC SHAPE PfP TRAINING CENTERS PfP CONSORTIUM PfP NATIONS Policy/ Process Multilevel NATO/ PfP Joint/Combined Exercises Supported by ADL

  12. PROPOSED PROCESS • CRAWL - WALK- RUN APPROACH • MAXIMUM PARTICIPATION AND/OR OBSERVATION DURING THE PROCESS NATO Link NATO/ PfP Exercises NATO Limited Participation Viking 03 Exercise Co-operative Nugget 04? Viking 05? Exercise PfP Augmentees ADL ADL Support PfP Countries` ADL & ACSTP Support timeline 2003 2005 2007?

  13. RECOMMENDATIONS • SACLANT should: • Be focal point for and co-ordinate ADL and Simulation efforts utilising the PfP Simulation Network. (NATO, PfP, ISO-PfP) • Develop (icw SHAPE) a phased programme to provide training • opportunities (combining CAXs and ADL). • NS(S) & NDC should: • Establish ADL chairs to co-ordinate and develop appropriate ADL content, • Co-ordinate this effort with the PfP Training Centres and with the • PfP Consortium.

  14. PROCESS TIMELINE REPORT “PROTOTYPE” EXERCISING NATO/ PfP Joint CAXs Non Article 5 Ops 1ST Workshop 1ST Draft 2DN Workshop 2DN Draft Approval Process NATO Link to PfP Ex. Report Production NATO/ PfP Exercise Preparation 2002 2003 2004 2005

  15. SIMULATION (and ADL) DESIRED EVOLUTION TODAY VIKING 03 VIKING 05 (OTHER?) END STATE ... Operational Level (CJTF & CC) Tactical Level (MNB & BATTALION) Individual ADL Support CJTF- Combined Joint Task Force CC- Component Command MNB- Multi-National Brigade

  16. NATO/ PfP Simulation Study QUESTIONS? Graham Burrows, Head MSCO Cdr Gregorio Ameyugo, Deputy Head MSCO msg@rta.nato.int

More Related