1 / 20

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview. CAPT Larry Olsen Deputy Commander MARMC 16 June 2004. Maintenance Initiatives. SHIPMAIN – the maintenance process Waterfront Integration – the organization NEMAIS – the “tool” (SAP). Why SHIPMAIN?.

laban
Télécharger la présentation

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview CAPT Larry Olsen Deputy Commander MARMC 16 June 2004

  2. Maintenance Initiatives • SHIPMAIN – the maintenance process • Waterfront Integration – the organization • NEMAIS – the “tool” (SAP)

  3. Why SHIPMAIN? • Address current maintenance and modernization challenges • Lack a common process and single process owner • Excessive handoffs across multiple organizations • Unclear accountability for results • Funding administration & uncertainty cause ‘churn’ • High “Premiums” paid in execution cost due to inefficient upkeep planning • Excessive spending on ALTS designed and procured, but not installed

  4. SHIPMAIN Goals • Install a common planning process for surface ship maintenance and modernization • Increase the efficiency of the process without compromising its effectiveness • Install a disciplined management process with objective measurements • Institutionalize the process and a continuous improvement method (JFMM & feedback)

  5. SHIPMAIN Philosophy • Minimize Growth and New Work (G&NW) through better planning and earlier MSR involvement. • Implement a Maintenance Figure of Merit (MFOM) approach to prioritize maintenance. • Change the “culture” to effectively reduce premiums paid by managing G&NW.

  6. SHIPMAIN • CFT-1 Requirements • CFT-2 Package Preparation • CFT-3 Placement and Oversight • CFT-4 Alterations and Modernization

  7. CFT-1 Requirements • Maintenance Teams – focal point • Planning Board for Maintenance • One-step work brokering and screening • Prioritized 2Ks: Maintenance Figure of Merit • Continuous flow of 2Ks to MSR • Auto screening of ICMP 2Ks • ICAVs provide electronic 2Ks • Metrics, metrics, metrics…more metrics

  8. What is a Maintenance Team? Commanding Officer Project Manager Port Engineer Contractor Representative Ship Supervisor (Not yet completely in place)

  9. Ship Maintenance Teams • Primary responsibilities – Focused on a Specific Ship • Identify and prioritize required work IAW consistent MFOM – validity and accuracy • Determine when and where work items will be accomplished - based on business practices that reduce cost • Match resources to prioritized requirements • Oversee availability execution Small cross-functional team executes planning and oversees execution

  10. CFT-2 Package Preparation • Master spec catalog • Establish reusable specifications • Provides template for new specs • Package prepared by executing activity • Robust feedback for new specs and cost returns

  11. CFT-3 Placement and Oversight • Coordination of MT and Contractor • Continuous Technical Advisory Reports • Gov’t estimates not required • Multi-Ship/Multi-Option (MSMO) contracts • Flow of maintenance items between CNO and continuous maintenance availabilities • RMCs control funding

  12. CFT-4 Alterations and Modernization • All ALTS through same process • Two Types: Program (K) & Fleet (D) • Mission and BG Interoperability focus • Hierarchical decision making model • Prioritized list: ALT Figure of Merit • Engineering/BCA filters applied before extensive development of an ALT

  13. Waterfront Integration • Fleet initiative • Combines RSG, SIMA, FTSCLANT and SUPSHIP Portsmouth • All RMC’s (non-shipyard) similar • Mid Atlantic (Norfolk) • South East (Mayport) • South Central (Ingleside) • South West (San Diego) • Personnel reductions achieved through attrition

  14. Waterfront Integration • Goals include: • Eliminate redundancy • Standardize processes both regionally and nationally • Implement the SHIPMAIN entitled process • Reduce reimbursable work >> mission funded • Somewhat more difficult in Norfolk due to complexity, geography, market and density

  15. 1,851 personnel = 1,782 military + 68 gov’t civilian + 1 contractor 627 personnel = 16 military + 456 gov’t civilian + 155 contractors 3,573 personnel = 2,117 military + 1,071 gov’t civilian + 385 contractors 1,016 personnel = 267 military + 527 gov’t civilian + 222 contractors 79 personnel = 52 military + 20 gov’t civilian + 7 contractors

  16. COMMANDER DEPUTY FINANCIAL MARMC Organization EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR WATERFRONTOPERATIONS PRODUCTION CONTRACTS ENGINEERING INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY COMMAND SUPPORT SVCS BUSINESSOFFICE LOGISTICS

  17. NEMAIS • NAVSEA’s solution for ship maintenance • Somewhat cumbersome at present • U-NNPI Certification in progress • Evaluating additional NEMAIS seats for MA-RMC functions • Need support while awaiting convergence

  18. ISSUES • No layoffs • Optimal Manning on surface ships – PMS • Reimbursable work for FTSCLANT • Shift from FFP to MSMO contracts • Four unions to negotiate with • Surface ship maintenance in the MED/GULF

  19. AND MORE ISSUES • Connectivity and AIS • 500+ instructions to merge • JFMM update • Funding churn… • Lots of moving parts…

  20. QUESTIONS?

More Related