1 / 17

Effektstyring ved hjælp af kerneårsagsanalyse

Effektstyring ved hjælp af kerneårsagsanalyse. Hvorfor?. Logisk model. implementeringsteori. forandringsteori. Kilde: Australske evalueringsforsker Patricia Rogers. University of Arizona, College of Public Health Ralph Renger Ph.D. Associate Professor renger@u.arizona.edu.

lada
Télécharger la présentation

Effektstyring ved hjælp af kerneårsagsanalyse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effektstyring ved hjælp af kerneårsagsanalyse

  2. Hvorfor?

  3. Logisk model implementeringsteori forandringsteori Kilde: Australske evalueringsforsker Patricia Rogers

  4. University of Arizona, College of Public Health Ralph RengerPh.D. AssociateProfessor renger@u.arizona.edu

  5. Kerneårsagsanalyse (ATM-modellen)* – antagelserne kommer frem * Amerikanske evalueringsforsker Ralph Renger

  6. Trin 1 - Kerneårsagsanalyse Årsag 3 Årsag 4 Årsag 2 Årsag 1 Problem der kan omformuleres til formål Hvorfor Hvorfor Hvorfor Hvorfor Kilde: Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessonslearned in the application of the ATM approach to developinglogic models”, i Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119

  7. Trin 2 - Fokusere indsatsen Kilde:Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119

  8. Kortsigtede, mellemlange og langsigtede effekter

  9. Identificere samarbejdspartnere Kilde: Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119

  10. Trin 3 - Opstille indikatorer Kilde:Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119

  11. Kritik af ATM-modellen

  12. Spændende artikel Astbury, Brad og Frans L. Leeuw (2010), ”Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation”, i: American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363-381.

  13. Sociale indsatser kan være enkle, komplicerede og komplekse Kilde: Patton, Michael Quinn (2011): Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use.The GuilfordPress

  14. Solidvidensbase

  15. Andre evalueringsformer end effektevaluering

  16. Q & A

More Related