100 likes | 244 Vues
In the case of Florida v. J.L., the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a 15-year-old Black male who was frisked based solely on an anonymous tip. The Court held that the tip did not provide sufficient grounds for a warrantless search. Authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the unanimous opinion emphasized the need for clear and just cause before conducting searches. This case highlights the significance of protecting individuals from unreasonable searches based solely on appearances or assumptions.
E N D
Florida v. J.L.2000 By: Juliannie Santiago Sarah Kennedy
Constitutional Issue • Under the Fourth Amendment, the search is unconstitutional illegal search and seizure.
Florida Description • Was trying to uphold their law • Anonymous tip • Defending original arrest
J.L. Description • 15 year old black male • Got frisked without a reason • Charged with carrying a weapon without license
Background of Case • Anonymous received by Miami-Dade police violate his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.
Majority Opinion • They violated the Fourth Amendment • 9 voted for J.L. • 0 voted against
Other Court Opinions • The unanimous opinion authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court concluded that J.L. the anonymous tip did not meet the minimum requirements to perform a warrantless search.
Significance • They judge by the appearance and they had no real reason and went by a tip.
Our Response to this Case • The police needs clear and just cause to search an individual.
Sources of Information • URL: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1993 • Name: Oyez • URL: http://www.stus.com/images/products/cpr0066.gif • Name: Stu’s View