1 / 15

RCP and RSP

WP/6. RCP and RSP. Planning and implementation. Presented to: SOCM/2. By: Tom Kraft tom.kraft@faa.gov. Date: 8-10 February 2012. Introduction.

lamya
Télécharger la présentation

RCP and RSP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP/6 RCP and RSP Planning and implementation Presented to: SOCM/2 By: Tom Krafttom.kraft@faa.gov Date: 8-10 February 2012

  2. Introduction • While the Asia/Pacific Region has an implementation plan for performance-based navigation no regional plan exists for the implementation of performance-based communication and surveillance • A number of States in the Region have reduced separations that are predicated on certain communication, surveillance, and navigation requirements • With an increasing proliferation of different aircraft FANS 1/A systems, and given current ground system implementations, it is possible that separations may be misapplied because the qualification criteria for communication and surveillance are not formally applied within the Asia/Pacific Region

  3. Background • In 2008, SOCM/1 recognized the concept of performance-based framework for communications and surveillance, prescribing global performance specifications and ensuring compliance • In 2010, in accordance with ICAO Annex 6 and Doc 4444, GOLD provided • Required Communication Performance (RCP) and Surveillance Performance (RSP) specifications • Guidelines on prescribing specifications in airspace where reduced separations are predicated on certain communication, navigation and surveillance performance requirements • Guidelines to States to aid in qualifying components of the operational system to the criteria prescribed by the performance specifications, including ANSP post-implementation monitoring • In 2010, APANPIRG formally adopted the GOLD • Supersedes the FANS 1/A Operations Manual (FOM) • APANPIRG and other ATS coordinating groups need to continue to manage the GOLD implementation concerning communications and surveillance performance

  4. Planning initiatives • As implementation of reduced separations, in trail and climb/descent procedures, reroutes and other operational capabilities becomes more widespread, the regions of the world will need to plan for and implement a global performance based framework for communications and surveillance

  5. Planning initiative examples • In June 2011, the North Atlantic Region System Planning Group endorsed its RCP and ADS-C Surveillance Performance Based Operations Implementation Plan, with an effective implementation date of February 2015. • In March 2011, the ISPACG agreed to support the development of a performance-based framework for communications and surveillance within the region. ISPACG encouraged its ANSP members to implement system performance monitoring per the GOLD as an element of their respective safety management system (SMS) programs

  6. NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (1 of 2)

  7. NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (2 of 2)

  8. NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan GOLD Jun 2010 Proposed PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment Issue PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment 4 Global 5, 8 5, 8 Plan DraftJun 2008 Mature RCP/RSP Plan Proposed GOLD Amendment NAT Doc 006/007 Draft PfA NAT Doc 7030 GOLD Amendment PfA NAT Doc 7030 1 NAT Groups 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16 9 5, 9, 13,16 1, 2, 3 • Plan update • Target dates • Performance specifications • GOLD, NAT Doc 006/007 • ADS-C conformance monitoring • Procedures for reroutes, non-normal operations • Flight plan indicators for specifications • Operator/aircraft approval guidance update • Technical/monitoring update • Guidance on operational approval • Draft PfA NAT Doc 7030 - RLongSM, RLatSM • NAT SPG/49 • Adopt GOLD Amendment • Process PfA DLMA Jun 2009 GOLD performance monitoring State AIPs & other docs 11 NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA 10, 14,17 11 11 12, 15 Shannon –1Q/2013 Bodo – TBD New York – < 2010 Gander – 1Q/2011 Shanwick – 4Q/2010 Santa Maria – 2Q/2011 Reykjavik –3Q/2011 RLongSM Trial NAT SPG/47 NAT SPG/48 12th ANC Data Link Mandate NAT SPG/49 OPLINKP OPLINKP D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 2011 2012 2013

  9. NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan GOLD amendment Jun 2013 PANS/ATM amendment Nov 2012 5, 8 Global GOLD NAT adoption PfA NAT Doc 7030 5, 9 NAT Groups Program management Coordination GOLD performance monitoring State AIP and other documents Operational readiness 10, 14, 15, 17 NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA 15 10, 14, 17 Performance-based Concept RLongSM RLatSM NAT SPG/50 NAT SPG/52 NAT SPG/51 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 2014 2015 2016

  10. Purpose • The performance-based framework is intended to fulfill a States obligation to ensure that the operational system meets requirements for intended uses • The framework will enable optimum use of technologies, such as Iridium and SwiftBroadband, and implementations, such as I4 Classic Aero and Iridium Next

  11. What needs to change • To implement a performance-based communications and surveillance framework, changes will be needed to: • Type design approval of aircraft, as necessary • Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) policies • Related operational authorizations • Regional SUPPs (ICAO Doc 7030 Amendments) and AIPs (or equivalent) • Flight plan requirements • ATC automation to act appropriately based on communication and surveillance equipment and capability indicators provided in the flight plan

  12. Other applications • It is expected that the performance-based framework would eventually apply to satellite communications (SATCOM) voice for air traffic control per the SATCOM Voice Guidance Material (SVGM) • SVGM is currently under development by the Inter-Regional SATCOM Voice Task Force (IRSVTF)

  13. Conclusion • A regional – but globally compatible – plan is needed throughout the Asia-Pacific Regions for the implementation of performance-based framework for communication and surveillance

  14. Action by the meeting 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) Note the information in this paper b) Cooperate with other regions and sub-regions within the Asia-Pacific Regions and North Atlantic Region c) Recommend to APANPIRG to include in its work program a planning and implementation initiative to effectively implement a performance based-framework Asia-Pacific Regions

More Related