1 / 34

Civil law precedent

Civil law precedent. Role of precedent in civil law General rule Exceptions Functional equivalent: Rota romana Some examples Louisiana (mixed system) Germany (judicial-centric). General rule. “Civil law world does not regard judicial pronouncements as binding in subsequent cases.”

laraine
Télécharger la présentation

Civil law precedent

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil law precedent • Role of precedent in civil law • General rule • Exceptions • Functional equivalent: Rota romana • Some examples • Louisiana (mixed system) • Germany (judicial-centric)

  2. General rule “Civil law world does not regard judicial pronouncements as binding in subsequent cases.” (principal touchstone: common law vs civil law) Questions – • Does this permit judicial/legal fluidity? (Jason) • What about “legal certainty”? (David, Elizabeth, Lucas) • Too much flexing with the times? (Kate, Caitlin)

  3. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: (Caitlin) __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico __ Brazil Pop quiz

  4. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico __ Brazil Pop quiz

  5. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico __ Brazil Pop quiz

  6. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico __ Brazil Pop quiz

  7. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico (David – curious transplant) __ Mexico __ Brazil Pop quiz

  8. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico (5/split super-majority – Erika) (“super precedent” – Reid) __ Brazil Pop quiz

  9. Exceptions: Deviation from prior decision of highest court requires en banc decision Successive decisions become controlling Constitutional courts’ decisions have force of law Judge-made customary law is binding Received code includes extant high-court interpretations Match: __ Germany __ France __ Italy __ Puerto Rico __ Mexico __ Brazil (sumula headnotes - Erika) Pop quiz

  10. Civil law precedent What is the difference between “jurisprudence” and “doctrine”? What is the difference between “jurisprudence constante” and “stare decisis”? (Reid, Elizabeth, Jason, Erika, Caitlin) What is “vertical/horizontal” stare decisis? (David)

  11. Rota romana

  12. Rota romana • Ius commune: procedure permitting judge to consult “wise men” (legal experts) • Papal auditors meet in room with “wheel” floor ornament • Give statement of facts and conclusion / but no legal analysis • Notes by auditors (decisiones rotae) highly persuasive in ius commune courts • Opinion of Rota becomes “common doctrine” • Rota qundoque rotat Any US parallel? (Reid)

  13. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion:

  14. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Breedlove hires attorney Turner to collect on bill of exchange given by Fletcher. Turner sues in New Orleans parish – wrong court. Breedlove then brings malpractice claim against Turner.

  15. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Did Turner wrongly disregard precedent of La. Sup Ct [Johnson v. Dunwoody (La. 1819)] that no jurisdiction in other than parish court where bill of exchange arose?

  16. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Rejects all six defenses – attorney must be aware of precedent or be responsible for the consequences.

  17. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Defense 1: Johnson v. Dunwoody (La 1819) was wrong. Correct interpretation allows suit in outside parish. Court: Even though change in court membership, case law still good.

  18. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Defense 2: Johnson v. Dunwoody (La 1819) is not law. Power to make law is legislative, not judicial. Court: News to us. We interpret legislative will, using analogies. Not bound to “obscure commentator” who lived centuries ago. Decide in “light of age” (But first a digression)

  19. A digression … • Stare decisis produces – • Uniformity • General acquiescence (rule of law) • Predictability (“men not acquainted with their rights”) • Transparency (decisions printed in reporters) • Stare decisis induces judicial humility (otherwise judicial power unbridled) • England: courts interpret statutes and create law • France: “science of jurisprudence carried to great perfection” (referred to in doctrinal writings) • Decisions of Court of Cassation • 250 collections of arrets from Ancien Regime (reporters = arretistes) • “Why else collect and preserve?” (and then some policy analysis)

  20. A digression … • Stare decisis produces – • Uniformity • General acquiescence (rule of law) • Predictability (“men not acquainted with their rights”) • Transparency (decisions printed in reporters) • Stare decisis induces judicial humility (otherwise judicial power unbridled) • England: courts interpret statutes and create law • France: “science of jurisprudence carried to great perfection” (referred to in doctrinal writings) • Decisions of Court of Cassation • 250 collections of arrets from Ancien Regime (reporters = arretistes) • “Why else collect and preserve?” (and then some policy analysis)

  21. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Defense 3-5: Refer doubtful cases to the legislature. Attorney immune when giving counsel. Attorney not fraudulent or neglectful. Court: No constitutional authority to refer (compare France). Attorneys not less, and perhaps more, responsible as counselor. Statute makes attorneys liable for neglect, including carelessness.

  22. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) • Facts: • Issue: • Holding: • Analysis (6 defenses): • Conclusion: Defense 6: The attorney only committed an error of judgment. Trial court and dissenting appeals court judge thought there was jurisdiction. And other attorneys rally in support. Court: “No man is supposed to know any branch of the law perfectly” (the fix is in - Erika)

  23. Breedlove v. Turner (La. 1821) Is Louisiana a “civil law” jurisdiction – Does court say it bound by code? (Lucas, David) does court explain conclusion? (Jason, Caitlin) are lawyers obligated to know case law? (Kate)

  24. Civil law precedent Does it make sense for a civil law system NOT to have stare decisis? John Henry Merryman

  25. Precedence in Germany • German Civil Code: Debtor “in default” must pay interest, unless holds reasonable opinion that not in “default” • What is “default”? Decision German Reichsgericht (1922): not reasonable if debtor holds view adversely determined by highest court

  26. Obligation of lawyer to ascertain precedent Decision German Reichsgericht (1984): Facts: P held liable on pre-incorporation contract when acted on behalf of unregistered corporation (LLC). Issue: Is P’s lawyer negligent for not knowing of cases accepting “novation” theory – person acting for corporation released once corporation adopts contract? Holding: Yes, lawyer negligent for not knowing. Should have appealed erroneous lower court decision.

  27. Neuerfasthof GmbH v. K (German Reichsgericht 1928) Mrs. K shares land Neurfasthof GmbH

  28. Neuerfasthof GmbH v. K (German Reichsgericht 1928) Mrs. K M Corp mortgage shares land Neurfasthof GmbH gold

  29. Neuerfasthof GmbH v. K (German Reichsgericht 1928) Mrs. K M Corp mortgage shares land What’s really happened? Neurfasthof GmbH gold

  30. Neuerfasthof GmbH v. K (German Reichsgericht 1928) Facts: K transferred her land to a registered LLC set up by M Corp and got registered stock. M Corp obtained a mortgage on the land and gave a loan of 179.2 kg of gold. K worries that M Corp will foreclose on mortgage and she will lose the land. She claims she was mentally insane (siphylis) when she transferred her land to the LLC. She wants the mortgaged canceled and the land returned to her. Issue: Can K have her land transfer rescinded on the theory she was mentally deranged? Relevant that land transferred in June 1923?

  31. Number of German Marks to buy one ounce of gold Jan 1919 170 Sept 1919 499 Jan 1920 1,340 Sept 1920 1,201 Jan 1921 1,349 Sept 1921 2,175 Jan 1922 3,976 Sept 1922 30,381 Jan 1923 372,477 Sept 1923 269,439,000 Oct 2, 1923 6,631,749,000 Oct 9, 1923 24,868,950,000 Oct 16, 1923 84,969,072,000 Oct 23, 1923 1,160,552,882,000 Oct 30, 1923 1,347,070,000,000 Nov 5, 1923 8,700,000,000,000 Nov 30, 1923 87,000,000,000,000 German Hyperinflation

  32. German Hyperinflation

  33. Neuerfasthof GmbH v. K (German Reichsgericht 1928) • German Civil Code 138(2) • … a jural act is void whereby a • person exploiting the difficulties … • of another causes to be granted to • himself … pecuniary advantages • which exceed the value of the • consideration … disproportion • obvious …. German Corporate Law (customary): Transfer of land to a registered corporation is binding since it is public act on which creditors rely. [many decisions – preservation of capital, public certainty] German Civil Code 826 One who intentionally injures another in a manner violating moral precepts is liable to the other ….

  34. Some comparative law … Is Germany a civil law or common law country? (Why follow custom? David)

More Related