1 / 14

GM Technology Ethical and moral dimensions

GM Technology Ethical and moral dimensions. Dr Bernie Jones AMASA 9 12/11/13. Ethical issues 1. First, consider scientists’ ethics and conduct Evil scientists only* exist in Hollywood. Ethical issues 2. “Scientists are playing God” Is using science and biotechnology really “playing God”?.

larissa-daniel
Télécharger la présentation

GM Technology Ethical and moral dimensions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GM TechnologyEthical and moral dimensions Dr Bernie Jones AMASA 9 12/11/13

  2. Ethical issues 1 First, consider scientists’ ethics and conduct Evil scientists only* exist in Hollywood

  3. Ethical issues 2 “Scientists are playing God” Is using science and biotechnology really “playing God”? 3

  4. Playing God? • No explicit instruction of prohibition in the sacred texts • Holy Bible • Holy Quran • Sacred texts of other religions

  5. Playing God? • Species boundaries derive from the view of Plato and Aristotle about eternal and ideal forms • ‘boundary-crossing’ prohibited to keep things separate for reasons of health, purity or cleanliness • Historical arguments about the fixity of species and fear of new varieties (eg potato not in Bible). • What we have heard about how the genetics and form of almost all crops (and some animals) have been altered over the millennia

  6. Playing God? • Insights into humans as ‘co-creators’ with God • Contributing to, rather than usurping the divine work of creation through new technology.

  7. Classical questions GM and biotechnology: • Is it safe? • Is it natural? • Is it fair? • Is it needed?

  8. Is it safe? • Questions of risks and risk assessment are notoriously hard to discuss rationally • Individual perception of risk and benefit • Mobile phones • Surgery • Road travel • “Dangerous” sports • Risks and benefits to wildlife and environment are no different from the introduction of any new plant variety or advanced hybrids derived from the well-established methods of conventional plant breeding

  9. Some more about safety

  10. Is it natural? • More like “hijacking” living processes and turning them to new ends • Which is what humans have been doing for millennia • …and what agrobacterium has been quietly and happily been doing for even longer • But still troublesome • How do we feel about: • in-vitro fertilisation • genetic testing during pregnancy • genetic technology to produce insulin, or vaccines

  11. Is it fair? • Public concerns expressed where they see science and its presentation shaped solely by commercial interests • Commercial vs public benefit • Developed world vs developing world benefit • Regulation • Intellectual property • Technology is fair; its application depends tho

  12. Is it needed? • Achieving food security requires that benefits outweigh the costs • risks are likely to be dealt with by well-functioning markets • market failure needs to be identified and targeted • barriers may exist that prevent markets functioning • Challenges that cannot (reasonably) be solved by other methods • Impact of the European Union (need, activists, European institutions)

  13. Power Politics (Porter, 2010) EU Member States general attitudes to GM Do you agree or not with use of biotechnology for food security? yes somewhat not sure no OK 77% of EU citizens are in favour of taking advantage of biotechnology in agriculture

  14. Thank you!

More Related