1 / 17

Lake Tsala Apopka Water Quality Data Report

Lake Tsala Apopka Water Quality Data Report. Citrus/Hernando Waterways Restoration Council Citrus County Task Force September 12, 2011. Lakes with the most consistent sampling frequency. Bellamy Cooter Croft Dodd Floral City Ft. Cooper Hampton Henderson Hernando Little (Consuella)

larya
Télécharger la présentation

Lake Tsala Apopka Water Quality Data Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lake Tsala Apopka Water Quality Data Report Citrus/Hernando Waterways Restoration Council Citrus County Task Force September 12, 2011

  2. Lakes with the most consistent sampling frequency Bellamy Cooter Croft Dodd Floral City Ft. Cooper Hampton Henderson Hernando Little (Consuella) Little Henderson Spivey Todd

  3. Lakes with the least consistent sampling frequency Bradley Cato Davis Magnolia Point Lonesome Tussock Van Ness

  4. Total Nitrogen, 2011 Average • <1 mg/L – Good conditions, low risk of water quality degradation • 1-1.5 mg/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages • >1.5 mg/L - System may be prone to sudden reductions in water quality, algae blooms

  5. Total Nitrogen, 2011 Average • Bellamy - 1.10 • Bradley - 1.34 • Cato - 0.78 • Cooter - 0.46 • Croft - 1.11 • Davis - 1.01 • Dodd - 1.14 • Floral City - 1.07 • Fort Cooper - 0.98 • Hampton - 0.99 • Henderson - 0.97 • Hernando - 1.02 • Little (Consuella) - 0.83 • Little Henderson - 0.96 • Magnolia – No Data • Point Lonesome - 1.50 • Spivey - 0.97 • Todd - 1.12 • Tussock - 1.09 • Van Ness - 1.14

  6. Total Nitrogen, 2010 Average • Bellamy - 1.20 • Bradley - 1.72 • Cato - 1.61 • Cooter - 0.42 • Croft - 1.34 • Davis - 1.55 • Dodd - 1.27 • Floral City - 1.41 • Fort Cooper - 1.11 • Hampton - 1.39 • Henderson - 1.36 • Hernando - 1.30 • Little (Consuella) - 0.80 • Little Henderson - 1.30 • Magnolia - 0.63 • Point Lonesome - 1.43 • Spivey - 1.49 • Todd - 1.26 • Tussock - 1.33 • Van Ness - 1.37

  7. Total Phosphorus, 2011 Average • <0.05 mg/L – Good conditions • 0.05-0.1 mg/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages • >0.1 ug/L - System may see a rapid increase in algal growth

  8. Total Phosphorus, 2011 Average • Bellamy - 0.019 • Bradley - 0.024 • Cato - 0.058 • Cooter - 0.025 • Croft - 0.015 • Davis - 0.022 • Dodd - 0.017 • Floral City - 0.033 • Fort Cooper - 0.011 • Hampton - 0.032 • Henderson - 0.019 • Hernando - 0.017 • Little (Consuella) - 0.027 • Little Henderson - 0.018 • Magnolia – No data • Point Lonesome - 0.028 • Spivey - 0.020 • Todd - 0.016 • Tussock - 0.045 • Van Ness - 0.015

  9. Total Phosphorus, 2010 Average • Bellamy - 0.019 • Bradley - 0.037 • Cato - 0.097 • Cooter - 0.027 • Croft - 0.014 • Davis - 0.035 • Dodd - 0.016 • Floral City - 0.056 • Fort Cooper - 0.011 • Hampton - 0.054 • Henderson - 0.027 • Hernando - 0.016 • Little (Consuella) - 0.019 • Little Henderson - 0.022 • Magnolia - 0.018 • Point Lonesome - 0.035 • Spivey - 0.034 • Todd - 0.016 • Tussock - 0.059 • Van Ness - 0.016

  10. Total Chlorophyll, 2011 Average • <15 ug/L – Good conditions, low incidence of algae • 15-30 ug/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages • >30 ug/L - System may become low in oxygen, low in light penetration

  11. Total Chlorophyll, 2011 Average • Bellamy - 5.42 • Bradley - 12.30 • Cato - 14.99 • Cooter - 4.38 • Croft - 5.17 • Davis - 3.84 • Dodd - 6.46 • Floral City - 12.18 • Fort Cooper - 1.58 • Hampton - 15.71 • Henderson - 5.43 • Hernando - 6.05 • Little (Consuella) - 6.88 • Little Henderson - 5.80 • Magnolia – No Data • Point Lonesome - 8.10 • Spivey - 5.93 • Todd - 5.67 • Tussock - 19.84 • Van Ness - 3.27

  12. Total Chlorophyll, 2010 Average • Bellamy - 6.66 • Bradley - 26.71 • Cato - 8.89 • Cooter - 3.68 • Croft - 5.97 • Davis - 21.39 • Dodd - 9.06 • Floral City - 12.72 • Fort Cooper - 1.59 • Hampton - 19.20 • Henderson - 17.23 • Hernando - 9.07 • Little (Consuella) - 6.07 • Little Henderson - 15.23 • Magnolia - 2.57 • Point Lonesome - 15.63 • Spivey - 33.95 • Todd - 7.74 • Tussock - 26.58 • Van Ness - 4.75

  13. Trophic State Index, 2011 Average • 0 – 50 – Good conditions, low risk of algae blooms • 50-70 – Fair conditions, water quality may be degraded • 70+ - System is experiencing trophic collapse, fish kills and algae blooms may occur

  14. Trophic State Index, 2011 Average • Bellamy - 42.5 • Bradley - 46.7 • Cato - 51.5 • Cooter - 34.0 • Croft - 39.2 • Davis - 39.5 • Dodd - 42.9 • Floral City - 50.7 • Fort Cooper - 26.2 • Hampton - 54.7 • Henderson - 42.6 • Hernando - 42.5 • Little (Consuella) - 46.5 • Little Henderson - 42.0 • Magnolia - No Data • Point Lonesome - 46.4 • Spivey - 43.4 • Todd - 40.1 • Tussock - 57.0 • Van Ness - 35.6

  15. Trophic State Index, 2010 Average • Bellamy - 43.1 • Bradley - 54.6 • Cato - 58.3 • Cooter - 37.3 • Croft - 39.0 • Davis - 53.0 • Dodd - 42.9 • Floral City - 53.2 • Fort Cooper - 26.8 • Hampton - 54.1 • Henderson - 50.4 • Hernando - 42.8 • Little (Consuella) - 42.9 • Little Henderson - 49.9 • Magnolia - 37.4 • Point Lonesome - 51.9 • Spivey - 52.4 • Todd - 42.5 • Tussock - 58.1 • Van Ness - 38.8

  16. Conclusions • Data for all lakes was well within state standards (where applicable) • Water Quality in 2011 so far is much better than in 2010 in most locations • Historically, water quality increases as you move south to north. But with nutrient data it appears that the Nitrogen levels in the Inverness has been better than the Hernando Pool.

More Related