1 / 29

Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the ACUITY Trial. Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators. Medical management. UFH/Enox + GP IIb/IIIa (n=4,603). PCI. Bivalirudin + GP IIb/IIIa (n=4,604).

lavinia-combs
Télécharger la présentation

Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary SyndromesFinal One-Year Results from the ACUITY Trial Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators

  2. Medical management UFH/Enox + GP IIb/IIIa (n=4,603) PCI Bivalirudin + GP IIb/IIIa (n=4,604) Angiography within 72h R* Bivalirudin Alone (n=4,612) CABG Study Design – First Randomization Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy (N = 13,819) 33% Moderate and high risk ACS (n=13,819) 56% Aspirin in all Clopidogrel dosing and timing per local practice 11% *Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration

  3. UFH/Enox + GP IIb/IIIa (N=4,603) GPI upstream (N=2294) GPI CCL for PCI (N=2309) Bivalirudin + GP IIb/IIIa (N=4,604) GPI upstream (N=2311) R* GPI CCL for PCI (N=2293) Bivalirudin Alone (N=4,612) Study Design – Second Randomization Moderate and high risk unstable angina or NSTEMI undergoing an invasive strategy Moderate and high risk ACS (n=13,819 Aspirin in all Clopidogrel dosing and timing per local practice *Stratified by pre-angiography thienopyridine use or administration

  4. 3 Primary Endpoints (at 30 Days) 1. Composite net clinical benefit = 2. Ischemic composite or 3. Major bleeding • Death from any cause • Myocardial infarction - During medical Rx: Any biomarker elevation >ULN - Post PCI: CKMB >ULN with new Q waves or >3x ULN w/o Q waves - Post CABG: CKMB >5x ULN with new Q waves, >10x ULN w/o Q waves • Unplanned revascularization for ischemia

  5. 1. Composite net clinical benefit = 3 Primary Endpoints (at 30 Days) 2. Ischemic composite or 3. Major bleeding • Non CABG related bleeding • - Intracranial bleeding or intraocular bleeding • -Retroperitoneal bleeding • Access site bleed requiring intervention/surgery • Hematoma ≥5 cm • -Hgb ≥3g/dL with an overt source or ≥4g/dL w/o overt source • -Blood product transfusion • Reoperation for bleeding

  6. Baseline Characteristics * creatinine clearance <60 mL/min

  7. Baseline High Risk Features *80.1% were biomarker+ or had baseline STΔ †97% were TIMI intermediate or high risk, or biomarker+, or +STΔ

  8. Primary Endpoint Measures (ITT) – 30 Days UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI p value(non inferior)(superior) UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa Primary endpoint Risk ratio ±95% CI Bival + IIb/IIIa RR (95% CI) <0.001 0.93 Net clinical outcome 11.8% 11.7% 1.01 (0.90-1.12) 0.015 0.39 Ischemic composite 7.7% 7.3% 1.07 (0.92-1.23) Upper boundary non-inferiority <0.001 0.38 Major bleeding 5.3% 5.7% 0.93 (0.78-1.10) Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa better UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa better Stone GW et al. NEJM 2006;355:2203-16

  9. Primary Endpoint Measures (ITT) – 30 Days UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone p value(non inferior)(superior) UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa Primary endpoint Risk ratio ±95% CI Bival alone RR (95% CI) <0.001 0.015 Net clinical outcome 10.1% 11.7% 0.86 (0.77-0.97) 0.01 0.32 Ischemic composite 7.8% 7.3% 1.08 (0.93-1.24) Upper boundary non-inferiority <0.001 <0.001 Major bleeding 3.0% 5.7% 0.53 (0.43-0.65) Bivalirudin alone better UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa better Stone GW et al. NEJM 2006;355:2203-16

  10. Medication Compliance: Anti-platelet agents *Greater than 50% of days since last visit

  11. Heparin + IIb/IIIa 4,603 Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa 4,604 Bivalirudin alone 4,612 Patient Follow-up at 1-Year* All patients N = 13,819 25 Withdrawn 62 Lost to follow-up 25 Withdrawn 66 Lost to follow-up 33 Withdrawn 69 Lost to follow-up Heparin + IIb/IIIa 4,516 (98.1%) 1-year FU Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa 4,502 (97.8%) 1-year FU Bivalirudin alone 4,521 (98.0%) 1-year FU *Endpoints adjudicated: Composite ischemia (death, MI, unplanned revasc) and stent thrombosis R

  12. 30 day P (log rank) 1 year P (log rank) Estimate Estimate p=0.55 UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa 7.4% — 16.3% — 0.36 0.38 Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa 7.8% 16.5% 0.34 0.31 Bivalirudin alone 7.9% 16.4% Ischemic Composite Endpoint(Death, MI, unplanned revascularization for ischemia) UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone 25 20 15 Composite ischemia (%) 10 Bivalirudin+GPI vs. Hep+GPI HR [95% CI] = 1.05 (0.94-1.16) 5 Bivalirudin alone vs. Hep+GPI HR [95% CI] = 1.05 (0.95-1.17) 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  13. Ischemic Composite Endpoint – GPIIb/IIIa Inhibitor Timing Randomization Routine Upstream GPI vs. Deferred Selective GPI 25 P (log rank) P (log rank) 30 day 1 year Estimate Estimate 20 Routine upstream IIb/IIIa 7.1% 15.7% 0.10 0.15 Deferred selective IIb/IIIa 8.1% 17.2% 15 Composite ischemia (%) 10 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  14. P (log rank) P (log rank) 30 day 1 year Estimate Estimate p=0.30 Routine upstream IIb/IIIa 0.18 0.20 7.1% 15.7% Deferred selective IIb/IIIa 0.59 0.88 8.1% 17.2% Bivalirudin alone 7.9% — 16.4% — Ischemic Composite Endpoint – GPIIb/IIIa Inhibitor Timing Randomization GPI Strategies vs. Bivalirudin Alone 25 20 15 Composite ischemia (%) 10 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  15. 17.7% 16.4% 1.14 (0.99-1.30) 14.6% 16.1% 0.95 (0.80-1.14) 16.2% 17.2% 0.97 (0.86-1.11) 16.4% 14.3% 1.20 (1.01-1.44) 19.8% 19.2% 1.09 (0.96-1.23) 21.1% 20.7% 1.04 (0.79-1.36) 9.0% 9.6% 0.97 (0.76-1.24) Composite Ischemia at 1-year UFH/Enoxaparin + GPIIb/IIIa vs. Bivalirudin alone 1 yr KM estimate UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa Hazard ratio ±95% CI Bival alone HR (95% CI) Pint Biomarkers (CK/Trop) Elevated (n=5072) Normal (n=3402) 0.11 Pre Thienopyridine Yes (n=5751) No (n=3305) 0.07 Actual Treatment PCI (n=5179) CABG (n=1040) Medical (n=2994) 0.67 Bivalirudin alone better UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa better

  16. Stent Thrombosis (Protocol): Definite/Probable P1 = Bivalirudin+GPI vs. UFH/Enox+GPI; P2 = Bivalirudin alone vs. UFH/Enox+GPI

  17. p=0.90 UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa Bivalirudin alone P (log rank) 1 year P (log rank) Estimate Estimate 1.4% — 4.4% — 0.53 0.93 1.6% 4.2% 0.39 0.66 1.6% 3.8% Mortality: 524 total deaths at 1-year UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone 5 Bivalirudin+GPI vs. Hep+GPI HR [95% CI] = 0.99 (0.80-1.22) 4 Bivalirudin alone vs. Hep+GPI HR [95% CI] = 0.95 (0.77-1.18) 3 Mortality (%) 2 30 day 1 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  18. 30 day P (log rank) Estimate p=0.45 UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa 1.4% — Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa 0.53 1.6% Bivalirudin alone 0.39 1.6% 30d - 1 year P (log rank) Estimate 3.1% — 0.54 2.7% 0.21 2.3% Early and Late MortalityLandmark analysis 4 3 Mortality (%) 2 1 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  19. 30 day P (log rank) 1 year P (log rank) Estimate Estimate p=0.78 UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa (N=2560) 0.9% — 3.1% — 0.45 0.91 Bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa (N=2606) 1.2% 2.4% 0.63 0.75 Bivalirudin alone (N=2619) 1.1% 2.2% Early and Late Mortality – PCI SubgroupLandmark analysis 4 3 Mortality (%) 2 1 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  20. Routine upstream IIb/IIIa Deferred selective IIb/IIIa Mortality – GPIIb/IIIa Inhibitor Timing Randomization Routine Upstream GPI vs. Deferred Selective GPI 5 4 3 Mortality (%) 2 P (log rank) P (log rank) 30 day 1 year Estimate Estimate 1 1.4% 4.3% 0.34 0.66 1.6% 4.3% 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  21. p=0.82 Routine upstream IIb/IIIa 0.30 0.87 Deferred selective IIb/IIIa 0.93 0.54 Bivalirudin alone 1.6% — Mortality – GPIIb/IIIa Inhibitor Timing Randomization GPI Strategies vs. Bivalirudin Alone 5 4 3 Mortality (%) 2 P (log rank) P (log rank) 30 day 1 year Estimate Estimate 1 1.4% 4.3% 1.6% 4.3% 3.8% — 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  22. 4.8% 5.0% 1.04 (0.80-1.34) 2.4% 3.6% 0.84 (0.55-1.28) 3.5% 4.2% 0.90 (0.68-1.18) 4.0% 4.4% 1.05 (0.74-1.48) 3.2% 4.0% 0.95 (0.70-1.29) 6.8% 6.7% 1.03 (0.64-1.66) 4.0% 4.3% 0.95 (0.66-1.37) Death at 1-year UFH/Enoxaparin + GPIIb/IIIa vs. Bivalirudin alone 1 yr KM estimate UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa Hazard ratio ±95% CI Bival alone HR (95% CI) Pint Biomarkers (CK/Trop) Elevated (n=5072) Normal (n=3402) 0.40 Pre Thienopyridine Yes (n=5751) No (n=3305) 0.52 Actual Treatment PCI (n=5179) CABG (n=1040) Medical (n=2994) 0.96 Bivalirudin alone better UFH/Enox + IIb/IIIa better

  23. UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa Bivalirudin alone REPLACE-2 + ACUITY-PCI: Mortality UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone 4 1 year P (log rank) Estimate 3.9% — 3 0.27 3.1% Mortality (%) 2 1 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  24. 30 day 30d - 1 year P (log rank) P (log rank) Estimate Estimate UFH/Enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa (n=5568) 0.7% 3.0% — — 0.24 0.79 Bivalirudin alone (n=5613) 0.6% 2.0% REPLACE-2 + ACUITY-PCI: Mortality UFH/Enoxaparin + GPI vs. Bivalirudin Alone 4 3 Mortality (%) 2 1 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  25. Patients with Major Bleed (N=645) 14.9% Patients with MI (N=705) 11.4% Patients w/o Major Bleed (N=13,168) 3.6% Patients w/o MI (N=13,108) 3.8% Impact of Major Adverse Events Within 30 Days on Subsequent Mortality Pts with vs. without MI and Major Bleeding within 30d 25 1 year Estimate 20 15 Mortality (%) 10 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  26. Major Bleed only (without MI) (N=551) 12.5% MI only (without Major Bleed) (N=611) 8.6% No MI or Major Bleed (N=12,557) Both MI and Major Bleed (N=94) 28.9% 3.4% p=0.04 Impact of MI and Major Bleeding (non-CABG) in the First 30 Days on Risk of Death Over 1 Year 1 yearEstimate 30 25 20 Mortality (%) 15 10 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days from Randomization

  27. Influence of Major Bleeding and MI in the First 30 Days on Risk of Death Over 1 Year Cox model adjusted for baseline predictors, with non-CABG major bleeding and MI as time-updated covariates HR ± 95% CI HR (95% CI) P-value

  28. Influence of Non-CABG Major Bleeding and MI in the First 30 Days on the Risk of Death Over 1 Year HR ± 95% CI Deaths (n/%) P-value HR (CI) 0.5 1 2 4 8 16

  29. Conclusions • In patients with moderate and high risk ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy with the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors • Bivalirudin is an acceptable substitute for either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin • Compared to either UFH/enoxaparin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibition or bivalirudin with GP IIb/IIIa inhibition • A bivalirudin alone strategy results in marked reduction of bleeding at 30 days, and similar rates of mortality and composite ischemia at 1-year • The results of this study further establish the important relationship between iatrogenic bleeding complications and the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS

More Related