1 / 20

British Academy of Management Getting Published in IJMR

British Academy of Management Getting Published in IJMR. Co-editors: Oswald Jones & Caroline Gatrell. IJMR : History & Impact. First reviews journal of its kind in Management Sub-disciplines Broadly focused: HRM; OB; IM; SM; Operations; Man. Sci.; IS; Acc & Fin; Marketing

lawrence-miles
Télécharger la présentation

British Academy of Management Getting Published in IJMR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. British Academy of ManagementGetting Published in IJMR Co-editors: Oswald Jones & Caroline Gatrell

  2. IJMR: History & Impact • First reviews journal of its kind in Management • Sub-disciplines • Broadly focused: • HRM; OB; IM; SM; Operations; Man. Sci.; IS; Acc & Fin; Marketing • State of the Art Reviews: • Specific aspect of sub-discipline, e.g. HRM, Appraisal systems • Launched 1999 • 4 Issues per year (approx 24 articles) • Current Impact Factor 3.333 (4.981) • 20th /172 in Management • 13th /116 in Business

  3. Global Readership 9% 3% 14% 6% 25% UK 20% 0.5%

  4. Percentage of Articles Accepted/Rejected Approximately 300 articles submitted each year.

  5. Why Review the Literature? • Precursor to empirical research • Establish current state of knowledge • Critically evaluate previous contributions • Identify ‘research gaps’ • Demonstrate your competence as a researcher • Provide a context for your research • Provide an intellectual framework (theory) • Test existing theory • Develop a ‘new’ theory • Define the research questions

  6. Why Review the Literature for IJMR? • Precursor to empirical study (PhD etc) • Establish the current state of knowledge • Critically evaluate previous contributions • Identify research gaps/research questions • Developing a new research trajectory • Evaluating the current state of knowledge • Evidence-based management (perhaps) • Enhancing your career • Good literature reviews attract citations

  7. Benefits of publishing in IJMR Having a clear overview enables scholars to articulate and spotlight areas where the research field may most ‘fruitfully direct its attention’ (Webster and Watson 2002: xiv, see also Baumeister and Leary, 1997). Time to produce major literature review is when topic area is mature: an ‘accumulated body of research exists that needs analysis and synthesis’ (Webster and Watson 2002: xiv; Baumeister and Leary, 1997).

  8. Benefits of publishing in IJMR Potential IJMR authors may be experienced researchers who have completed a literature review prior to leading a major research project. Or, they may be early career scholars who have a clear and up-to-date knowledge of an existing body of literature, such as those who have recently completed their doctoral studies (Baumeister and Leary, 1997).

  9. Benefits of publishing in IJMR • As PhD students, you will develop a clear and substantial overview of your field, which facilitates the identification of patterns and gaps within the literature. You will be ‘ahead of the game’ in this respect • A review paper can offer you a springboard or platform from which to launch your research

  10. Benefits of publishing in IJMR • Özbilginet al.’s (2011) IJMR review ‘work-life balance, diversity and intersectionality’ led to IJMR ‘Emic Approach to Intersectional Study of Diversity at Work: A Bourdieuan Framing, and later paper in Human Relations ‘The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity’ • Gatrell’s (2011) transdisciplinary review, ‘Managing the Maternal Body’: platform for the introduction of socio-cultural constructions of maternity and employment to management and organization studies – later paper in Human Relations

  11. How to write for IJMR Need to join discussion on at least two levels: obvious gaps, or where disciplinary silos exist: no synergies between related research arenas [for example among and between organizational psychology and the sociologies of family and work life balance, as in the previous example of Özbilginet al.’s (2011) paper].

  12. How to write for IJMR Equally, you might review literatures in an emerging, or rapidly changing arena, which is sufficiently mature to warrant a review, but where there is potential for developing stronger ‘theoretical foundations’ (Webster and Watson 2002:xiv).

  13. How to write for IJMR • Need to be clear where you are joining the debate and in particular, how and where you are joining existing debate in IJMR. • See Gatrell, C. J., Burnett, S. B., Cooper, C. L., & Sparrow, P. (2013). Work–Life Balance and Parenthood: A Comparative Review of Definitions, Equity and Enrichment,IJMR 15(3), 300-316and how this links with Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. P. (2011). Work–life, diversity and intersectionality: a critical review and research agenda.IJMR13(2), 177-198.

  14. How to write for IJMR • Critically analyse literature. Set it in the wider context of the field • Be explicit about how you are joining the debate in your field and how your research moves things forward • Identify how you made decisions about what to include (your methods) • Read guidelines and look at existing reviews • Consider writing with your supervisor

  15. Structuring the review Status of journals Key sources Key theories and concepts Major issues & debates Epistemological & ontological issues Literature review Main problems to date Political standpoints Structure & organization of the topic Origins & definitions of topic Key authors

  16. Reviewing the literature? Systematic literature reviews Conceptual papers Bibliometric analysis Traditional Meta- Realist Meta- Meta narrative ethnography synthesis narrative analysis Positivism Constructivism Critical realism • IJMR papers dominated by traditional narrative and SLRs • More innovatory approaches to literature reviews in • business & management

  17. Reasons for IJMR Rejections • Based on our experience as editor (desk rejections) • Did not read the author guidelines • Did not read any papers from the journal • Includes empirical data • Too short (less than 5000 words) • Conceptual paper without adequate literature review • Topic not appropriate for IJMR • Field of study not mature – limited papers/status of journals • Bibliometricanalysis (effectively a ‘list’) • Rejections by reviewers • Literature review too descriptive (and insufficiently analytical) • Review poorly organized – no clear sequence/flow • Did not cite key sources • Citations not up-to-date • Misinterpreting or misrepresenting key contributors • No significant contribution to knowledge • Good lit reviews central to publication in business and management

  18. What makes an IJMR Article? • Is field/sub-field mature to warrant an extensive review? • Is the review coherently bounded? • What has been included/excluded? • A synthesis & evaluation of existing state of knowledge? • A categorisation of themes and sub-themes? • A complete analysis of the literature? • Contrasting methods/methodologies • Strengths and weaknesses • Agreement and disagreements • Authoritative conclusions about the current state of literature? • Does the review identify gaps & future research directions? • Clear about contributions to theory, practice & policy?

  19. Key contact details: • Managing Editor: • Emma Missen: ijmr@bam.ac.uk • Website: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2370 • Journal Submission: • http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ijmr • Editors: • o.jones@liverpool.ac.uk • c.gatrell@lancaster.ac.uk

  20. Questions

More Related