1 / 6

AS9104/1 Interpretation Consistency Working Group

AS9104/1 Interpretation Consistency Working Group. September 18, 2013. Issue Needing Attention Inconsistency in Interpretations Causing Confusion in Implementation and oversight. PDCA & Change Lifecycles. Current Activity in Lifecycle. AS9104/1 Writing-Voting-Rewriting ..…..Approval.

lawson
Télécharger la présentation

AS9104/1 Interpretation Consistency Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AS9104/1 Interpretation ConsistencyWorking Group September 18, 2013 Issue Needing Attention Inconsistency in Interpretations Causing Confusion in Implementation and oversight

  2. PDCA & Change Lifecycles Current Activity in Lifecycle AS9104/1 Writing-Voting-Rewriting ..…..Approval AS9104/1 Implementation Oversight Evaluation Varied Interpretations Harmonization Consistency • Emerging Occurrences of Inconsistency or Guidance Needs • Discussion of Specific Examples From Recent Experiences • RMC/OPMT need to get in front of Variable Interpretation Phase • FMEA • Development of Vision • Words to Address the vision • Robust Debate & Discussion • Eventual Consensus • ANAB • Industry Oversight • Supplemental Oversight • Office Audits • Witnessed Audits • Etc. • Variety of interpretations from Oversight personnel • Developing Confusion and need for clarifications • Consistency of Expectations & Execution by all Stakeholders • Good Intentioned Interpretations by Implementers • Based on words in the Standards • Discussions with Writing Team Members

  3. RMC Interaction • Established Working Group • Goal of Kickoff Meeting (9/16/13) • To Understand Industry State of Affairs Regarding Implementation Consistency Clarification Needs • Develop an Encompassing set of Clarification Needs with Potential Solution Guidance for Input into IDR/SDR Process • Submit through the Established IDR/SDR Clarification Process • Cross Functional Representation (AB, CB, OP Ass., Sup. Aud. Ass., IDR/SDR, etc.)

  4. Outcomes • Repeat Findings • Audit Duration • CA Timelines • Transfers • Suspension • Robust Discussion on Variety of Inconsistency & Interpretation Topics • Site Structure • Distance • 80/20 • Needed Justifications • Central Function • Determination for Inclusion in WG Focus • IDR/SDR Determination for FAQ/Resolution Need • IDR/SDR to Process Solutions in accordance with Established IDR/SDR Processes

  5. Next Steps • Presentation to RMC (9/18) • OPMT Presentation (Montreal – 10/08) • Future Meetings • Web Based – As needed • Face to Face – January 15, 2014 Palm Beach, FL • Input to IDR/SDRs (Sept 2013) • Outputs by IDR/SDRs • FAQs, Resolutions, etc. Oct 2013 • Communications • IAQG/AAQG/OPMT websites • Training • Inputs to OP Assessor Workshop 1/16/2014 • Inputs to Auditor Workshop 7/17-18/2014 (Long Beach, CA)

  6. Questions…..

More Related