1 / 19

CFA/CHANCELLOR BARGAINING 2011

CFA/CHANCELLOR BARGAINING 2011. WHAT’S AT STAKE?. In the beginning…. In face of California’s budget crisis CFA offered to extend the contract Made more sense to fight together for funding than fight each other at the bargaining table. Chancellor’s Response. NO!

leanna
Télécharger la présentation

CFA/CHANCELLOR BARGAINING 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CFA/CHANCELLOR BARGAINING2011 WHAT’S AT STAKE?

  2. In the beginning… • In face of California’s budget crisis CFA offered to extend the contract • Made more sense to fight together for funding than fight each other at the bargaining table

  3. Chancellor’s Response • NO! • Management has “operational needs” • Changes in the CSU in recent years + take backs will transform: • the CSU as a public university • the faculty’s role in the university • the fundamental “job” of being a faculty member

  4. CFA’S BARGAINING PROPOSALS • Resist the Chancellor’s vision for CSU and his take-backs • Shape a different vision: Professional working conditions and reasonable learning conditions are essential for quality education. • Five values in our contract that are key to providing quality higher education

  5. #1Faculty need working conditions and student deserve learning conditions that make quality education possible

  6. CFA PROPOSALS • Faculty decide the pedagogically appropriate sizes for classes • The contract enforce those class size limits • If class sizes exceeded faculty should be compensated

  7. #2No Privatization of the CSU California needs a university that is public and affordable

  8. CSU Initiatives and Trends • Driving more courses and programs to extension • Move toward “for profit” model • Lower pay and no benefits for teaching in extension – “piece work” • Students pay more; faculty earn less

  9. CFA PUSH BACK PROPOSALS • Regular academic year pay and benefits for all for-credit summer and extension courses • Recognize academic freedom for all faculty work, including extension and online education

  10. #3Students Need a Stable Faculty Workforce

  11. CFA Proposals • Increase tenure-track hiring • Maintain three-year and unconditional full-time lecturer appointments • Prevent contracting out of CSU faculty work

  12. CFA Proposals • Equal rights for counselors, librarians, coaches: • No segregation of coaches into a separate article • FERPing rights for tenured counselors • Assigned time for tenure-track/tenured librarians with research or service responsibilities • Fee waiver for all faculty for all children up to age 26 • Reject the Chancellor’s proposal to forbid use of fee waivers for CSU doctorates

  13. #4Support Faculty as Professionals;Respect Faculty’s Professional Judgment

  14. CFA PROPOSALS • Support for faculty leave programs • Increase opportunities for sabbaticals and other leaves • Respect for shared governance and the faculty’s role in educational decisions • CFA proposals guarantee faculty control over curriculum and over academic and professional standards • No contracting out!

  15. CHANCELLOR'S PROPOSALS REJECTED BY CFA • Expand campus President’s ability to deny sabbaticals • Weaken the authority of an arbitrator in RTP cases • Raise the burden of proof for faculty in RTP grievances • Eliminate the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” for faculty suspended without pay for more than 30 days • President not faculty determines number of classes in which faculty will be evaluated • All non-CSU employment reported annually to management.

  16. #5 Quality education requires investing in CSU faculty--even in hard times

  17. CSU PROPOSALS: NOTHING NOW; LESS LATER • No salary increases in 11/12 • Reopeners that would allow for reductions in salaries AND benefits in 12/13 and 13/14

  18. CFA SALARY PROPOSALS • Implement year 2 of the Equity Program for Associate and Full Professors • 1% General Salary Increase 2011/12, 2012/13, 2013/14 • Increase GSI to 5% in first year that CSU gross operating budget reaches budget request for 08/09 • Service Salary Increase each year for eligible faculty

  19. We must reject a contractthat would: • Usher in a lower-quality CSU • Diminish the role of faculty in the university • Degrade the profession for our colleagues, our students, and the CSU

More Related